Jump to content

Giving Each Song a Rating...


Mr. Not
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 24 2012, 06:09 PM)
Caravan- 1/10
BU2B-1/10
Clockwork Angels-10/10
The Anarchist- 9/10
Carnies-1/10
Halo Effect-7/10
Seven Cities of Gold-1/10
The wreckers-8/10
Headlong Flight-8/10
BU2B2- N/A
Wish them Well-3/10
The Garden- 10/10

Mick

I like how you didn't rate bu2b2--how can we really???

 

 

Clockwork Angels song is freaking awesome idn't???

 

 

 

trink39.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (DistantEarlyRushFan @ Jul 25 2012, 02:25 AM)
QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 24 2012, 06:09 PM)
Caravan- 1/10
BU2B-1/10
Clockwork Angels-10/10
The Anarchist- 9/10
Carnies-1/10
Halo Effect-7/10
Seven Cities of Gold-1/10
The wreckers-8/10
Headlong Flight-8/10
BU2B2- N/A
Wish them Well-3/10
The Garden- 10/10

Mick

wat

 

can you explain your rationale?

Hmmmmmmmm let's see

 

Caravan and BU2B- Have not liked these 2 since release....could have been chopped off I would not miss them.

 

carnies- Blah....i can't even tell you the chorus of this one. un-memorable

 

Seven cities-Repetitive and the vocal Gives me a searing headache.

 

BU2B2-Just a link peice

 

Wish them Well- Used to like this one.....it wore thin fast....very repetitive.

 

The rest I enjoy....I'm just not a superfan of this record. wink.gif

 

hoped that helped.

 

Mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tombstone Mountain @ Jul 25 2012, 09:44 AM)
QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 24 2012, 06:09 PM)
Caravan- 1/10
BU2B-1/10
Clockwork Angels-10/10
The Anarchist- 9/10
Carnies-1/10
Halo Effect-7/10
Seven Cities of Gold-1/10
The wreckers-8/10
Headlong Flight-8/10
BU2B2- N/A
Wish them Well-3/10
The Garden- 10/10

Mick

I like how you didn't rate bu2b2--how can we really???

 

 

Clockwork Angels song is freaking awesome idn't???

 

 

 

trink39.gif

Yea..The Title track is one of the best tunes they've done in a while. 1022.gif

 

Mick

Edited by bluefox4000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 25 2012, 11:05 AM)
Yea..The Title track is one of the best tunes they've done in a while.  1022.gif

Mick

goodpost.gif 1022.gif 2.gif trink39.gif 653.gif applaudit.gif new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif

 

Damn straight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From worst to first, based on my preference for pulling any individual song out to listen, or rated most likely to skip.

 

BU2B2 - 1/12

Seven Cities of Gold - 2/12

Wish Them Well - 3/12

Carnies - 4/12

Halo Effect - 5/12

Caravan - 6/12

BU2B - 7/12

The Anarchist - 8/12

Headlong Flight - 9/12

The Garden - 10/12

The Wreckers - 11/12

Clockwork Angels - 12/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caravan- 7/10

BU2B-7/10

Clockwork Angels-8/10

The Anarchist- 9/10

Carnies-6/10

Halo Effect-6/10

Seven Cities of Gold-6/10

The wreckers-6/10

Headlong Flight-7/10

BU2B2- N/A

Wish them Well- 6/10

The Garden- 7/10

 

For me, anything above 5 is listenable, 6-7 is strong, 8-10 is exceptional. A very solid album with no major flaws. The sound quality is a small complaint, but definitely not as bad as VT. Best overall album since Signals.

 

Oh, and why all the hate for Halo effect and Carnies? I just don't get it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 25 2012, 08:01 AM)
QUOTE (DistantEarlyRushFan @ Jul 25 2012, 02:25 AM)
QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 24 2012, 06:09 PM)
Caravan- 1/10
BU2B-1/10
Clockwork Angels-10/10
The Anarchist- 9/10
Carnies-1/10
Halo Effect-7/10
Seven Cities of Gold-1/10
The wreckers-8/10
Headlong Flight-8/10
BU2B2- N/A
Wish them Well-3/10
The Garden- 10/10

Mick

wat

 

can you explain your rationale?

Hmmmmmmmm let's see

 

Caravan and BU2B- Have not liked these 2 since release....could have been chopped off I would not miss them.

 

carnies- Blah....i can't even tell you the chorus of this one. un-memorable

 

Seven cities-Repetitive and the vocal Gives me a searing headache.

 

BU2B2-Just a link peice

 

Wish them Well- Used to like this one.....it wore thin fast....very repetitive.

 

The rest I enjoy....I'm just not a superfan of this record. wink.gif

 

hoped that helped.

 

Mick

You're entitled to your opinions, of course, it just seems so random which songs you love and which songs you hate. For example, you think really highly of The Wreckers, Headlong Flight and especially The Anarchist, Clockwork Angels & The Garden (and rightly so as they're all top-notch songs), but then completely dismiss Caravan, BU2B, Carnies and Seven Cities of Gold, which makes no sense to me (and I imagine to many others) - most of those are as good as the others. What makes Headlong Flight and The Wreckers great, while at the same time makes Caravan and BU2B so terrible? confused13.gif

 

I guess it's just personal preference, but it certainly is a headscratcher!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 11:53 AM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 07:35 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 12:59 PM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 06:04 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 05:22 AM)
Ok, I'll play:

Caravan 2/10
BU2B 2/10
Clockwork Angels 4/10
The Anarchist 4/10
Carnies 5/10
Halo Effect 3/10
Seven Cities Of Gold 1/10
The Wreckers 4/10
Headlong Flight 4/10
BU2B2 1/10
Wish Them Well 1/10
The Garden 5/10

So better than anything they've released since Signals for me.

Nice attention grab. schla03.gif

 

I'm still waiting for Trenken and Gemini to weigh in with theirs:

 

Caravan 0/10

BU2B 0/10

Clockwork Angels 0/10

The Anarchist 0/10

Carnies 0/10

Halo Effect 0/10

Seven Cities Of Gold 0/10

The Wreckers 0/10

Headlong Flight 0/10

BU2B2 0/10

Wish Them Well 0/10

The Garden 0/10

Why do you care how other people perceive or enjoy an album. The fact that you like it should be enough.

Other posts that say "I'm glad you like "it"" are equally perplexing.

 

eg:

 

QUOTE


Seriously, I'm glad you're liking it so much. trink39.gif CA really is amazingly consistent, as seen in your ratings.

I hope Seven Cities grows on you. I know you like the debut, and for me Seven Cities really sounds like a modern take on What You're Doing or Working Man (Zeppelin-ish blues rock). It's become one of my top 2-3 tracks on the album. 1022.gif


 

confused13.gif

 

Why should you wish that a track grows on someone? You didnt write it and it shouldn't change your enjoyment whether they do or they don't.

 

 

 

 

comp26.gif

Obviously we're all interested in what other fans think about CA, or we wouldn't check out this forum. confused13.gif

 

I'm still tying to figure out why YOU'RE here, though. confused13.gif

 

If CA earns a 3/10 for you but is their best since Signals, obviously everything Rush has done for thirty years has been shit for you.

 

So why are you still here with 4800+ posts after thirty years of dissapointment? confused13.gif

 

After three freaking decades, I think I would move on. confused13.gif

 

confused13.gif

 

EDIT: Just saw your review on Prog Archives, and I'm completely confused. How do you give CA a five star rating given your ratings above?

Because of people like you!

 

Stop over-reacting to what other people think and feel about music. Stop being a sheep.

I have to admit that I'm completely puzzled as well. How do you give the album a 3/10 average when rating it per song, but then give it a 5 out of 5 star review? The math doesn't add up. confused13.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caravan - 6/10

 

BU2B - 8/10

 

Clockwork Angels - 10/10

 

The Anarchist - 10/10

 

Carnies - 7/10

 

Halo Effect - 5/10

 

Seven Cities of Gold - 9/10

 

The Wreckers - 7/10

 

Headlong Flight - 8/10

 

BU2B2 - 4/10

 

Wish them Well - 9/10

 

The Garden - 9/10

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Jul 23 2012, 09:47 AM)
Several times I've wanted to take on this thread and give a numerical rating to the songs.

I keep coming to the same difficulty, which is that I have to take Rush's entire career into consideration when doing so. For example, songs like Xanadu, La Villa, Tom Sawyer, Subdivisions and SO many other are solid 10's. I absolutely love Clockwork Angels and The Garden and so many other songs on this album, but are they in that category? Do I give them 10's just because I think they're amazing songs, or do I give them 9's because they're not quite at the level of Xanadu?

In reality, however, Xanadu would be like a 15 out of 10, so surely some of the new songs could rate at least a 10. It almost seems as if 1-10 isn't enough of a rating system. If I gave The Garden a 10 it says it's as good as Xanadu, but to rate it a 9 or 9.5 doesn't seem fair either. I have to look at all of it in a greater perspective, and I'm not sure I'm ready to do that yet - it's all still so new. I could rate the songs against each other on the album only. For example, the best songs would get a 10 regardless of Rush's history.

I know many would think I'm way overthinking this, and I'm sure they're right, but I think about these things when giving rankings - I don't do it lightly. Anyway, still thinking about if and how I could rank these songs 1-10...

screw the slide rule shit--the heart knows reason that reason knows not. Overthinking the thing Goobs.

 

I did like your ratings though rofl3.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Jul 25 2012, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 11:53 AM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 07:35 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 12:59 PM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 06:04 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 05:22 AM)
Ok, I'll play:

Caravan 2/10
BU2B 2/10
Clockwork Angels 4/10
The Anarchist 4/10
Carnies 5/10
Halo Effect 3/10
Seven Cities Of Gold 1/10
The Wreckers 4/10
Headlong Flight 4/10
BU2B2 1/10
Wish Them Well 1/10
The Garden 5/10

So better than anything they've released since Signals for me.

Nice attention grab. schla03.gif

 

I'm still waiting for Trenken and Gemini to weigh in with theirs:

 

Caravan 0/10

BU2B 0/10

Clockwork Angels 0/10

The Anarchist 0/10

Carnies 0/10

Halo Effect 0/10

Seven Cities Of Gold 0/10

The Wreckers 0/10

Headlong Flight 0/10

BU2B2 0/10

Wish Them Well 0/10

The Garden 0/10

Why do you care how other people perceive or enjoy an album. The fact that you like it should be enough.

Other posts that say "I'm glad you like "it"" are equally perplexing.

 

eg:

 

QUOTE


Seriously, I'm glad you're liking it so much. trink39.gif CA really is amazingly consistent, as seen in your ratings.

I hope Seven Cities grows on you. I know you like the debut, and for me Seven Cities really sounds like a modern take on What You're Doing or Working Man (Zeppelin-ish blues rock). It's become one of my top 2-3 tracks on the album. 1022.gif


 

confused13.gif

 

Why should you wish that a track grows on someone? You didnt write it and it shouldn't change your enjoyment whether they do or they don't.

 

 

 

 

comp26.gif

Obviously we're all interested in what other fans think about CA, or we wouldn't check out this forum. confused13.gif

 

I'm still tying to figure out why YOU'RE here, though. confused13.gif

 

If CA earns a 3/10 for you but is their best since Signals, obviously everything Rush has done for thirty years has been shit for you.

 

So why are you still here with 4800+ posts after thirty years of dissapointment? confused13.gif

 

After three freaking decades, I think I would move on. confused13.gif

 

confused13.gif

 

EDIT: Just saw your review on Prog Archives, and I'm completely confused. How do you give CA a five star rating given your ratings above?

Because of people like you!

 

Stop over-reacting to what other people think and feel about music. Stop being a sheep.

I have to admit that I'm completely puzzled as well. How do you give the album a 3/10 average when rating it per song, but then give it a 5 out of 5 star review? The math doesn't add up. confused13.gif

Someone hijacked Tony's account at Prog archives. tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tombstone Mountain @ Jul 25 2012, 12:47 PM)
QUOTE (rushgoober @ Jul 23 2012, 09:47 AM)
Several times I've wanted to take on this thread and give a numerical rating to the songs.

I keep coming to the same difficulty, which is that I have to take Rush's entire career into consideration when doing so.  For example, songs like Xanadu, La Villa, Tom Sawyer, Subdivisions and SO many other are solid 10's.  I absolutely love Clockwork Angels and The Garden and so many other songs on this album, but are they in that category?  Do I give them 10's just because I think they're amazing songs, or do I give them 9's because they're not quite at the level of Xanadu? 

In reality, however, Xanadu would be like a 15 out of 10, so surely some of the new songs could rate at least a 10.  It almost seems as if 1-10 isn't enough of a rating system.  If I gave The Garden a 10 it says it's as good as Xanadu, but to rate it a 9 or 9.5 doesn't seem fair either.  I have to look at all of it in a greater perspective, and I'm not sure I'm ready to do that yet - it's all still so new.  I could rate the songs against each other on the album only.  For example, the best songs would get a 10 regardless of Rush's history. 

I know many would think I'm way overthinking this, and I'm sure they're right, but I think about these things when giving rankings - I don't do it lightly.  Anyway, still thinking about if and how I could rank these songs 1-10...

screw the slide rule shit--the heart knows reason that reason knows not. Overthinking the thing Goobs.

 

I did like your ratings though rofl3.gif

Goober, use finer decimal ratings....like Xanadu can be a 9.9 and Garden can be 9.1.....if that helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AN AWFUL LOT OF 10's!

 

Keeping in mind that Hemispheres or Natural Science or Limelight is a 10, here's what I have:

 

Caravan: 9/10

BU2B: 10/10

Clockwork Angels: 9/10

The Anarchist: 9/10

Carnies: 8/10

Halo Effect: 8/10

Seven Cities of Gold: 5/10

The Wreckers: 1/10

Headlong Flight: 9/10

Wish Them Well: 6/10

The Garden: 7/10

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Jul 25 2012, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 11:53 AM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 07:35 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 12:59 PM)
QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 24 2012, 06:04 PM)
QUOTE (Tony R @ Jul 24 2012, 05:22 AM)
Ok, I'll play:

Caravan 2/10
BU2B 2/10
Clockwork Angels 4/10
The Anarchist 4/10
Carnies 5/10
Halo Effect 3/10
Seven Cities Of Gold 1/10
The Wreckers 4/10
Headlong Flight 4/10
BU2B2 1/10
Wish Them Well 1/10
The Garden 5/10

So better than anything they've released since Signals for me.

Nice attention grab. schla03.gif

 

I'm still waiting for Trenken and Gemini to weigh in with theirs:

 

Caravan 0/10

BU2B 0/10

Clockwork Angels 0/10

The Anarchist 0/10

Carnies 0/10

Halo Effect 0/10

Seven Cities Of Gold 0/10

The Wreckers 0/10

Headlong Flight 0/10

BU2B2 0/10

Wish Them Well 0/10

The Garden 0/10

Why do you care how other people perceive or enjoy an album. The fact that you like it should be enough.

Other posts that say "I'm glad you like "it"" are equally perplexing.

 

eg:

 

QUOTE


Seriously, I'm glad you're liking it so much. trink39.gif CA really is amazingly consistent, as seen in your ratings.

I hope Seven Cities grows on you. I know you like the debut, and for me Seven Cities really sounds like a modern take on What You're Doing or Working Man (Zeppelin-ish blues rock). It's become one of my top 2-3 tracks on the album. 1022.gif


 

confused13.gif

 

Why should you wish that a track grows on someone? You didnt write it and it shouldn't change your enjoyment whether they do or they don't.

 

 

 

 

comp26.gif

Obviously we're all interested in what other fans think about CA, or we wouldn't check out this forum. confused13.gif

 

I'm still tying to figure out why YOU'RE here, though. confused13.gif

 

If CA earns a 3/10 for you but is their best since Signals, obviously everything Rush has done for thirty years has been shit for you.

 

So why are you still here with 4800+ posts after thirty years of dissapointment? confused13.gif

 

After three freaking decades, I think I would move on. confused13.gif

 

confused13.gif

 

EDIT: Just saw your review on Prog Archives, and I'm completely confused. How do you give CA a five star rating given your ratings above?

Because of people like you!

 

Stop over-reacting to what other people think and feel about music. Stop being a sheep.

I have to admit that I'm completely puzzled as well. How do you give the album a 3/10 average when rating it per song, but then give it a 5 out of 5 star review? The math doesn't add up. confused13.gif

He's fishing for reactions. He knows that certain people are going to get all riled up over low ratings for the songs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All in all I think it is a superb album and one that exceeded my expectations. I love how it is not like any other album. It is in my top three for sure.

 

Caravan 8/10

BU2B 8/10, the new intro made it even better.

Clockwork Angels 10/10

The Anarchist 8/10

Carnies 8/10

Halo Effect 9/10

Seven Cities of Gold 10/10

The Wreckers 8/10

Headlong Flight 10/10

BU2B2 1/10, not quite sure why this song was needed. It's kind of a downer. I would much rather have had a rockin' or soulful instrumental.

Wish Them Well 8/10

The Garden 10/10-Simply outstanding.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caravan 8/10

BU2B 8/10

Clockwork Angels 10/10

The Anarchist 8/10

Carnies 8/10

Halo Effect 9/10

Seven Cities of Gold 8/10

The Wreckers 10/10

Headlong Flight 10/10

BU2B2 5/10

Wish Them Well 8/10

The Garden 10/10

 

8.8/10, rounds to a 9/10

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Jul 23 2012, 11:59 PM)
What I really need is an explanation of what 1-10 means. I did that for rating albums:

QUOTE
10. Absolute perfection all the way through - a masterpiece.
9. Excellent, not one weak track and nearly perfect.
8. Great album, a must-own.
7. Very good album - well worth owning.
6. Not thier best, but still pretty darn good.
5. I don't listen that often, but it's a good album.
4. It's not bad, some weaker material.
3 - It's alright, I'll listen and enjoy it occasionally, but will often skip some tracks.
2 - There are a couple of good or great tracks, but generally fairly weak.
1 - Barely listenable, for completists only, only one or two even halfway-decent tracks.
0 - Just really bad, no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

 

That makes sense to me, and if I use that as a universal guide when rating albums, it will all be consistent using the same criteria.

 

I find coming up with a ranking system, or what 1-10 actually means far more difficult when dealing with individual songs. What makes a song a 10 instead of a 9, or a 9.5, or a 9.75? Do I reward a song with a 10 because it's the best of the best of the best and therefore give other songs that are also completely outstanding a lesser grade just because they're not quite at that level?

 

At some point it becomes about levels of perfection to me as opposed to perfect vs. not completely perfect. It's easier to determine this with an entire album. Do I reward all perfect songs with a 10 even though some are MORE perfect than others? wacko.gif

 

When I came up with my long list of perfect albums, some criticized I had too many, that I was too lenient, and their lists were FAR shorter only giving a very few the PERFECT rating, but really how could I not give something a rating of perfect, just because there were albums that were MORE perfect? An album that I truly love from start to finish without any complaints has to be perfect to me, even though some albums are even better than that. Really though, it's not a bad problem to have...

I just have a general issue with those numbers. A 3 is "alright"? Imho, a 3 is shit with few positives going for it. A 4 is "not bad"? Isn't a 4 below average? Wouldn't that alone put it in the general ballpark or vicinity of bad? Anyway...

 

I'm surprised by how BU2B2 got some 7s and 8s. How? What did it do that was so good? Someone mentioned "as a transitional piece". I don't know, I can't see THAT kind of short transitional piece getting such high marks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10/10: Perfect. No flaws in sight.

9/10: Kicks ass, very few noticeable flaws.

8/10: Very good, a few more flaws.

7/10: Pretty good, not to be skipped.

6/10: Better than average. Barely.

5/10: Average.

4/10: Worse than average. Probably just filler.

3/10: Pretty bad. Many flaws.

2/10: Very few redeeming qualities.

1/10: Terrible. Absolutely horrific.

0/10: Embarrasingly bad, should never have been recorded.

 

 

Caravan: 9/10

BU2B: 8/10 The only thing that bothers me is the intro. Was it necessary to sing an entire verse over the guitar?

Clockwork Angels: 7/10 Some vocal melodies don't really do it for me.

The Anarchist: 9/10

Carnies: 7/10

Halo Effect: 7/10

Seven Cities of Gold: 8/10

The Wreckers: 5/10 Boring, generic rock.

Headlong Flight: 9/10 Very good, but a bit repetitious.

BU2B2: 0/10 Eight thumbs down.

Wish Them Well: 6/10

The Garden: 8/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caravan - 9

BU2B - 9

Clockwork Angels - 10

The Anarchist - 9

Carnies - 9

Halo Effect - 9

Seven Cities Of Gold - 8

The Wreckers - 9

Headlong Flight - 9

BU2B2 - 8

Wish Them Well - 9

The Garden - 10

 

The album still grows on me so the rating might change daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...