Jump to content

THE ONLY SPAM THREAD v.25


That One Guy
 Share

  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. When did TRF chatroom get taken down?

    • May 1st
      7
    • "This year"
      5


Recommended Posts

Fiat, you're supposed to be leasing the 500e for $200-250 with nothing down, not $410 with $4k down

 

you ain't gonna move any of these things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dealing with an angry resident in a public meeting is probably going to be really fun tomorrow night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, That One Guy said:

Wish I could've seen Tom Petty live

Aye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

Fiat, you're supposed to be leasing the 500e for $200-250 with nothing down, not $410 with $4k down

 

you ain't gonna move any of these things

Ma Stella thinks her shit don't stink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, That One Guy said:

Wish I could've seen Tom Petty live

He was my first concert when I was 11. I’m grateful that I got to see him once.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m trying to make phone calls and speak in coherent sentences but it’s not working 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Union 5-3992 said:

Didn’t we used to play hockey together?

didn't we used to play shut the f**k up, hands on the car?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jamie said:

I’m trying to make phone calls and speak in coherent sentences but it’s not working 

These days I just text the IRS. They're always asking for unredeemed Google Play Store cards to settle unpaid taxes I didn't know about, though.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

save me, vitamin d rich foods!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

save me, soy milk! save me, tuna! save me, eggs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Republicans seem like they would get confused at a pound of feathers weighing as much as a pound of steel

 

"The voting map has less blue land than red land, why is the smaller blue land winning?"

Edited by That One Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, JohnRogers said:

Aye.

Got to Petty with Black Crowes as the opener.  Helluva show.

 

Miata hotbox got the night started :smoke:

Edited by goose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Niece and nephew hit the air today so it's just sister and husband still hanging around, at least until tomorrow night then they jet off back to eff ell aye.

 

Better them than me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, That One Guy said:

Republicans seem like they would get confused at a pound of feathers weighing as much as a pound of steel

 

"The voting map has less blue land than red land, why is the smaller blue land winning?"

The converse of dems not understanding the importance for preserving the electoral college 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, goose said:

The converse of dems not understanding the importance for preserving the electoral college 

I was in favor of it when I was 19, but in older age I don’t see the purpose. I particularly hate most states going winner take all on their electoral votes, that’s the main problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

I was in favor of it when I was 19, but in older age I don’t see the purpose. I particularly hate most states going winner take all on their electoral votes, that’s the main problem. 

It's an important protection for geographic and political minorities.  Urban centers are more disconnected than ever  from rural realities, and more bent on a tyrannically universal approach to legislation

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, goose said:

It's an important protection for geographic and political minorities.  Urban centers are more disconnected than ever  from rural realities, and more bent on a tyrannically universal approach to legislation

That's the reason I usually hear, so that cities don't boss around the most rural of areas.

 

But society continues to urbanize, and this trend is not going to reverse. In 30 years, with the percentage of citizens being urban even larger, is the E.C. still going to "protect" the rural people?

 

At some point, if enough people are urban, they're going to call the shots no matter what. Giving farmin' states two senators seems like the biggest benefit the sub-million states have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take huge issue with all-or-nothing electoral votes. It tells California R's and North Dakota/Alaska/Iowa etcccc R's that their vote does not influence the election whatsoever.

 

If the electoral college is so important in its current form, why do we even allow two states to split their electoral votes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, That One Guy said:

That's the reason I usually hear, so that cities don't boss around the most rural of areas.

 

But society continues to urbanize, and this trend is not going to reverse. In 30 years, with the percentage of citizens being urban even larger, is the E.C. still going to "protect" the rural people?

 

At some point, if enough people are urban, they're going to call the shots no matter what. Giving farmin' states two senators seems like the biggest benefit the sub-million states have.

That already happens in states like Illinois, Oregon, and Washington. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...