Digital Dad Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 The White Album is perfect.That's racist! Ok. The Black Album is perfect.Still racist! Jack Black, Lewis Black and Ron White walk into this bar and.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod in Toronto Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 I'm not a fan of The Beatles, but The Caucasian Album has some good tunes. And I find Asian Submarine a cool song too. But personally I prefer Metallica's The African American Album. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 I'm not a fan of The Beatles, but The Caucasian Album has some good tunes. And I find Asian Submarine a cool song too. But personally I prefer Metallica's The African American Album.Don't think that being politically correct is going to get me to start liking you again, but it may get you elected into office. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible airwave Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 What about the pink album by Garbage? Too girly.The blue album by 311? Too..blue,er,sad. Let's not forget those Baroness albums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible airwave Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 (edited) The White Album is perfect. Perfectly flawed and suitably bloated perhaps. I agree with this. And I love it for all its blemishes as well as the highlights. Not a single moment to dislike in my opinion. Wild Honey Pie would like to have a word with you. Revolution 9 isn't technically a song so it don't count. It's like Fitter Happier on OK Computer. Edited August 8, 2015 by invisible airwave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 The White Album is perfect. Perfectly flawed and suitably bloated perhaps. I agree with this. And I love it for all its blemishes as well as the highlights. Not a single moment to dislike in my opinion. Wild Honey Pie would like to have a word with you. Revolution 9 isn't technically a song so it don't count. It's like Fitter Happier on OK Computer. I love it all. Revolution 9 is awesome if you ask me! It adds to the crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible airwave Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Keith is jealous that Their Satanic Majesties Request sucked. Like both bands but they pale in comparison compared to The Who and Pink Floyd. Hell, even though they're 70s, The Clash are more important. "No Elvis, Beatles or the Rolling Stones!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 The only band of the sixties I like more than The Beatles is The Doors. The Kinks are about equal in my books. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union 5-3992 Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 It used to be my favorite record by them, but over the years it's fallen in its ranking a little. It's still very solid, but not really a masterpiece Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djflex Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Keith Richards is still alive? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union 5-3992 Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union 5-3992 Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 And by garbage, I mean post Tattoo You Rolling Stones. They had some real stinkers after that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Sgt Pepper was never a great album. Parts of it are actually embarrassing. It was just George Martin trying to make "something" out of the raw material the band had presented him. I will never understand the hype about their songs. Had they not had the "Boy Band" persona, and massive female fanbase, they would have sunk like all the other similar combos of the time. The emergence of "Rock" with the emphasis now more on musicianship rather than looks,meant they were destined to split up. Their own studio efforts were impossible to reproduce live, not that they bothered with their fans by that time anyway. All death threats to the usual address please.Dumber than anything you've ever posted in SOCN. And that's saying a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Keith is jealous that Their Satanic Majesties Request sucked. Like both bands but they pale in comparison compared to The Who and Pink Floyd. Hell, even though they're 70s, The Clash are more important. "No Elvis, Beatles or the Rolling Stones!"Pray tell, how do the Stones and the Beatles pale in comparison to the Who and Pink Floyd and how are the Clash more important? I understand that someone would like a band more or think a band was better, but more important? The Stones and the Beatles are arguably the two most important bands of all-time, artistically and critically and commercially. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 And by garbage, I mean post Tattoo You Rolling Stones. They had some real stinkers after that A Bigger Bang is a really good album. So is Steel Wheels. The others can be spotty for sure. Still some great songs in there though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. I have yet to hear it. I didn't know this, so I will remedy that. What is different about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. I have yet to hear it. I didn't know this, so I will remedy that. What is different about it?It's stripped down as originally intended. No Phil Spector overdubs or flourishes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto-digitation Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. I have yet to hear it. I didn't know this, so I will remedy that. What is different about it?It's stripped down as originally intended. No Phil Spector overdubs or flourishes. ...plus no Maggie Mae or Dig It (neither any loss), BUT the deserved inclusion of Don't Let Me Down, which never should have been left off to begin with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. I have yet to hear it. I didn't know this, so I will remedy that. What is different about it?It's stripped down as originally intended. No Phil Spector overdubs or flourishes. This sounds grand! My only beef was the Phil Spectorisms... And Don't Let Me Down in place of Maggie Mae and Dig It? Replacing two b-side at best songs with one super high-quality A-side worthy smash is a brilliant idea! I will get this soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It's too bad The Beatles broke up when they did. The Stones were untouchable from Beggars Banquet to Goats Head Soup. Where The Beatles would have gone from Abbey Road (the last album they actually worked on) is an interesting question.Better to leave us wanting more than to continue like the Rolling Stones and make some garbage I love Abbey Road, Let It Be was very underrated. Yup, they ended great! The Naked version is better than Spector's IMO. I have yet to hear it. I didn't know this, so I will remedy that. What is different about it?It's stripped down as originally intended. No Phil Spector overdubs or flourishes. This sounds grand! My only beef was the Phil Spectorisms... And Don't Let Me Down in place of Maggie Mae and Dig It? Replacing two b-side at best songs with one super high-quality A-side worthy smash is a brilliant idea! I will get this soon.And it's remixed and remastered. "The Long and Winding Road" really shines. Simple and poignant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By Tor Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 (edited) Just wonder if he`s heard himself play guitar the last decade .Rubbish and shit would be a complement . I digress .Just like to know which album he thinks of the Stones that is better than Pepper ? The only Stones album that is worthy of "one of the greatest albums of all time " is Sticky Fingers and that`s just a good blues rock album which there are a hell of lot of "Blues rock " abums that blow that one out of the water . I`m a Stones fan BTW , so I know what I`m talking about .Unlike Keith . Edited August 9, 2015 by By Tor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Just wonder if he`s heard himself play guitar the last decade .Rubbish and shit would be a complement . I digress .Just like to know which album he thinks of the Stones that is better than Pepper ? The only Stones album that is worthy of "one of the greatest albums of all time " is Sticky Fingers and that`s just a good blues rock album which there are a hell of lot of "Blues rock " abums that blow that one out of the water . I`m a Stones fan BTW , so I know what I`m talking about .Unlike Keith .He wasn't comparing the Beatles and the Stones. He ripped both Pepper and Satanic. I think his point was the Beatles and Stones got caught up in the whole Psychedelic movement and forgot to be rock and roll bands. I think he has a point, since the Stones and the Beatles both went back to their "roots" on the following albums - The Beatles and Beggars Banquet. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now