Wayne Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) Rolling Stones frontman Sir Mick Jagger has become a father again at age of 73, his publicist has confirmed. The singer already has seven children whose ages range from 17 to 45 and he became a great-grandfather in 2014. His 29-year-old girlfriend, American ballerina Melanie Hamrick, gave birth to a boy in New York on Thursday, the singer's publicist Bernard Doherty said. A statement said Hamrick and Sir Mick were "both delighted" at the birth. It added: "Mick was at the hospital for the arrival. "Mother and baby are doing well and we request that the media respect their privacy at this time." Edited December 9, 2016 by Wayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted December 9, 2016 Author Share Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) spas double post .... sorry Rolling Stones frontman has become a father again at the age of 73, his publicist has confirmed.The singer already has 7 children whose ages range from 17 to 45 and he became a great grandfather in 2014.His 29 year old girlfriend, American ballerina Melanie Hamrick, gave birth to a boy in New York on Thursday.A statement said Hamrick and Sir Mick were 'delighted' at the birth.It added 'Mick was at the hospital for the arrival.''Mother and baby are doing well and we request that the media respect their privacy at this time.' Edited December 9, 2016 by Wayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue J Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J2112YYZ Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. Wait, were any of his kids actually planned? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relayer2112 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. Wait, were any of his kids actually planned? I think his current wife is a ballerina, so she probably just bent the correct way so that his boys were just drifting downstream. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue J Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. The baby isn't the creepiness I was referring to. Seventy-three and 29, seriously? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
custom55 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 His 'thing' has a life of its own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. The baby isn't the creepiness I was referring to. Seventy-three and 29, seriously?^^^ Ageist. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod in Toronto Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canadianice Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. The baby isn't the creepiness I was referring to. Seventy-three and 29, seriously? Smart women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket ignites Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. Wait, were any of his kids actually planned? I think his current wife is a ballerina, so she probably just bent the correct way so that his boys were just drifting downstream. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSnwdog Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Damn. At 73, you'd think the sperm would just swim around in circles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue J Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. The baby isn't the creepiness I was referring to. Seventy-three and 29, seriously?^^^ Ageist. Call it what you will. My opinion isn't out to influence anyone else's. But it's still my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken hawk Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 That kid has it made for life ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordgalaxy Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 That kid has it made for life !And will probably have a dead dad before he's 10. Bravo, Mick. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue J Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 That kid has it made for life !And will probably have a dead dad before he's 10. Bravo, Mick. Exactly. This boy's very earliest memories of his father will be of a nearly 80 year-old man. Pardon me for having a bit of a problem with that, for the boy's sake. Mick Jagger is one of those celebrities who I'd be just fine with not knowing the first thing about his personal life. Great performer, great music...it can stop there. That's plenty! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 100% creepy. Kind of, but I doubt Jagger thought his boys could still swim at his age. So the baby was probably not planned. The baby isn't the creepiness I was referring to. Seventy-three and 29, seriously?^^^ Ageist. Call it what you will. My opinion isn't out to influence anyone else's. But it's still my opinion.;) I wonder how many 29yo ballerinas hang with 73yo paupers... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relayer2112 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Damn. At 73, you'd think the sperm would just swim around in circles. It's possible that he's more potent now than ever. At 73, his sperm probably evolved by losing the tail and developing webbed feet. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disembodied Spirit Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 His...... Love Is Strong Ballerina?? ...........A Little T&A Daddy at 73?............He was a Fool To Cry........... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoopid Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Some of these response win the internet for me today. Bravo. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wil1972 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Damn. At 73, you'd think the sperm would just swim around in circles. It's possible that he's more potent now than ever. At 73, his sperm probably evolved by losing the tail and developing webbed feet. Hahahaha!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 I think it's kind of creepy too. It's hard to imagine that any 20 some-year-old woman would want to sleep with a 70 some-year-old man. No matter who they were. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wil1972 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 I think it's kind of creepy too. It's hard to imagine that any 20 some-year-old woman would want to sleep with a 70 some-year-old man. No matter who they were. Money goggles. Kinda like beer goggles without the hangover. Although I am sure the vomiting is still produced at the same rate. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Damn. At 73, you'd think the sperm would just swim around in circles. Or sink... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 100% creepy.Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now