Rhyta Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 (edited) Ok, I listened to Vapor Trails today and still think it is an underrated album, love the intensity of the music and powerful lyrics. :haz: So after perusing this thread I have listened to TFE and Counterparts since I hadn't played them in a while. Neither of them are very strong over all :sigh: Only songs on each that I like: Driven/Resist and Stick it out/ Leave That Thing Alone. I think another reason I like Vapor Trails so much is the Rush in Rio DVD, the joyous crowd's reaction colored my response to the album. I also like the segment in Beyond the Lighted Stage where it shows Neil driving to a concert on his motorcycle while Secret Touch is playing in the background. :rush: Edited June 21, 2013 by Rhyta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losingit2k Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Test For Echo is a much better sounding and produced album while the writing in VT is better. Regardless, I think these album are about the same. Test for Echo: TFE, Driven, Half the World, Time & Motion, Resist and Limbo. Vapor Trails: One Little Victory, Secret Touch, Earth Shine, Vapor Trails, Ghost Rider, and Sweet Miracle. So basically Test For Echo wins by the margin of Production. At least you can listen to it. :codger:Make a 2 hour setlist using those 2 albums and 7 songs from any of the other albums....but 1 rule: you can't use all of 2112 or HemispheresToo Easy! :P 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sin City Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 As asked a few pages ago, does anyone from the UK rate Counterparts, as I've never read or seen a positive view of that record over here?? Too many circular arguments here and other albums being brought into the debate that were not part of the OP's poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangsterfurious Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I love Vapor Trails so much. It was the first album I listened to all the way though but my gawds I wish they'd get that thing re-mastered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retrospective Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 As asked a few pages ago, does anyone from the UK rate Counterparts, as I've never read or seen a positive view of that record over here?? Too many circular arguments here and other albums being brought into the debate that were not part of the OP's poll. Not sure why you're talking about Counterparts on a Test for Echo/Vapor Trails thread, then... I personally have no problem, but according to your post, you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lifeson90 Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Im from the uk and i hardly listen to counterparts these days for one reason being that i loved the album so much on release and played it so much for a couple years after that i just became over-familiar with it, so much so that the counterparts sound even seems a bit dated to me as i associate it so much with those years. After RTB i was just tremendously energised with the sheer energy and power of the guys sound on counterparts, was like the band was back harder stronger and faster and i loved it as much as first discovering 2112 AFTK hemispheres and permanent waves it was literally too awesome for words and i remember my feelings about it passionately. Like geds bass in alien shore was an utter revelation, hard rock rush meets disco and Al lettin rip in cut to the chase mann they were the days and cold fire literally bring me to tears with the hard raw emotion of it These days i love TFE but at the time i wasnt as impressed until the glorious vapor trails came along to turn things up yet another notch we been seriously spoilt by this great great band. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xmac Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 (edited) I am new to the forum so bare with me ! Of all the albums, T4E is easily the most forgettable for me. Lyrically its pretty bad - not much going on musically. Regarding the OP, I believe VT to be a much better album - there are a few great tracks on there which are so much more memorable to me than T4E. Dog years? Ugh. Virtuality? Ugh. OH...I also think that CP is def one of their best - Top 7 for me. Edited June 22, 2013 by xmac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShlappinDahBass Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I am new to the forum so bare with me ! Of all the albums, T4E is easily the most forgettable for me. Lyrically its pretty bad - not much going on musically. Regarding the OP, I believe VT to be a much better album - there are a few great tracks on there which are so much more memorable to me than T4E. Dog years? Ugh. Virtuality? Ugh. OH...I also think that CP is def one of their best - Top 7 for me. I like this guy! Welcome to the forum! :sundog: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coventry Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think you have to consider the contexts of each album. VT is Neil's grief expression, his bildungsroman of sorrow and pain and escape, questioning, and tentative rebirth. As such, it's going to be a dark, somewhat inaccessible album because it's so personal. There're highlights, of course - the choruses of 'Ghost Rider" (and I love the many meanings and ambiguities of that title!) and 'Ceiling Unlimited', the sheer dominance of 'Freeze', the musicality of "Stars...". But like the production, it can be a muddled and difficult album. Still, it was prety refreshing when it came out. T4E seems to be Neil grasping at something to write about. After the dominant themes of the last two albums (chance in RTB and opposition in CP), clutching at the straws of the emerging dot com zeitgeist seems weak and naive in retrospect. There are some musical highlights here - "Driven', 'Totem', the title track, but much of the lyrics are cliche at best and downright blah much of the time. It's an album I really can't remember when I listened to last or when I'll listen to again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micgtr71 Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I am going to be completely honest...both albums were exciting when they came out and neither get regular spins from me. I think there are some great songs on both albums and some not so exciting songs on each. Both albums were mixed for cd so they sound harsher than what I would like. VT is worse, but there are no songs on it as difficult to enjoy as Dog Years. For that alone, my vote goes to VT over T4E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
presto123 Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I love Vapor Trails so much. It was the first album I listened to all the way though but my gawds I wish they'd get that thing re-mastered. They did. It's they HD tracks (I tunes) thing for 2013. That Andy (forget his last name) guy spent 4 days on VT alone so it's probably about as good as it's going to get without re-recording the whole record. The samples I heard sound waaay better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I love Vapor Trails so much. It was the first album I listened to all the way though but my gawds I wish they'd get that thing re-mastered. They did. It's they HD tracks (I tunes) thing for 2013. That Andy (forget his last name) guy spent 4 days on VT alone so it's probably about as good as it's going to get without re-recording the whole record. The samples I heard sound waaay better.A remix will help (did you listen to the Retrospective remixes), but the HDTracks remasters are an improvement, even when whittled down to iTunes playable levels. But I can't wait for the day that the remix comes out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think you have to consider the contexts of each album. VT is Neil's grief expression, his bildungsroman of sorrow and pain and escape, questioning, and tentative rebirth. As such, it's going to be a dark, somewhat inaccessible album because it's so personal. There're highlights, of course - the choruses of 'Ghost Rider" (and I love the many meanings and ambiguities of that title!) and 'Ceiling Unlimited', the sheer dominance of 'Freeze', the musicality of "Stars...". But like the production, it can be a muddled and difficult album. Still, it was prety refreshing when it came out. T4E seems to be Neil grasping at something to write about. After the dominant themes of the last two albums (chance in RTB and opposition in CP), clutching at the straws of the emerging dot com zeitgeist seems weak and naive in retrospect. There are some musical highlights here - "Driven', 'Totem', the title track, but much of the lyrics are cliche at best and downright blah much of the time. It's an album I really can't remember when I listened to last or when I'll listen to again. T4E isn't Neil grasping at something to write about, it is Neil describing a society which is grasping at something to care about. That's why I think the lyrics work so well and were such a refreshing change from the previous album. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 (edited) I think you have to consider the contexts of each album. VT is Neil's grief expression, his bildungsroman of sorrow and pain and escape, questioning, and tentative rebirth. As such, it's going to be a dark, somewhat inaccessible album because it's so personal. There're highlights, of course - the choruses of 'Ghost Rider" (and I love the many meanings and ambiguities of that title!) and 'Ceiling Unlimited', the sheer dominance of 'Freeze', the musicality of "Stars...". But like the production, it can be a muddled and difficult album. Still, it was prety refreshing when it came out. T4E seems to be Neil grasping at something to write about. After the dominant themes of the last two albums (chance in RTB and opposition in CP), clutching at the straws of the emerging dot com zeitgeist seems weak and naive in retrospect. There are some musical highlights here - "Driven', 'Totem', the title track, but much of the lyrics are cliche at best and downright blah much of the time. It's an album I really can't remember when I listened to last or when I'll listen to again. T4E isn't Neil grasping at something to write about, it is Neil describing a society which is grasping at something to care about. That's why I think the lyrics work so well Yikes! From Test For Echo: Camera curves over caved-in cop carsBleacher-creatures, would-be desperados Tough-talking hood boys in pro-team logo knock-offsConform to uniforms of some corporate entityDon't change that stationIt's Gangster Nation Nail-biting hood boys in borrowed ties and jacketsClutching at the straws of respectabilityCan't do the time?Don't do the crimeAnd wind up in the perp walk on TV From Virtuality: I can see the footprints in the virtual sand Net boy, net girlSend your signal 'round the worldLet your fingers walk and talkAnd set you free Net boy, net girlSend your impulse 'round the worldPut your message in a modemAnd throw it in the Cyber Sea Let's dance tonightTo a virtual songPress this keyAnd you can play along Let's fly tonightOn our virtual wingsPress this keyTo see amazing things I can smell her perfume, I can taste her lipsI can feel the voltage from her fingertips Net boy, net girlSend your heartbeat round the world From Dog Years: In a dog's lifeA year is really more like sevenAnd all too soon a canineWill be chasing cars in doggie heaven Dog years - It's the season of the itchDog years - With every scratch it reappearsDog years - For every sad son of a bitchDog years - With his tail between his ears I'd rather be a tortoise from GalapagosOr a span of geological timeThan be living in these dog years In a dog's brainA constant buzz of low-level staticOne sniff at the hydrantAnd the answer is automatic From Totem: I've got twelve disciples and a Buddha smileThe Garden of Allah, Viking ValhallaA miracle once in a while I've got a pantheon of animals in a pagan soulVishnu and Gaia - Aztec and MayaDance around my totem pole I've got idols and icons, unspoken holy vowsThoughts to keep well-hidden -Sacred and forbiddenFree to browse among the holy cows Edited June 22, 2013 by rushgoober 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGr8imL84AD8inF8sBlackSedan Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 VT way over T4E. T4E has some good riffs and quite a few good parts in songs, but not any really good songs...as a matter of fact it has mostly bad songs with a few good parts. I find it to be the single biggest disappointment I've ever had a RUSH fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coventry Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think you have to consider the contexts of each album. VT is Neil's grief expression, his bildungsroman of sorrow and pain and escape, questioning, and tentative rebirth. As such, it's going to be a dark, somewhat inaccessible album because it's so personal. There're highlights, of course - the choruses of 'Ghost Rider" (and I love the many meanings and ambiguities of that title!) and 'Ceiling Unlimited', the sheer dominance of 'Freeze', the musicality of "Stars...". But like the production, it can be a muddled and difficult album. Still, it was prety refreshing when it came out. T4E seems to be Neil grasping at something to write about. After the dominant themes of the last two albums (chance in RTB and opposition in CP), clutching at the straws of the emerging dot com zeitgeist seems weak and naive in retrospect. There are some musical highlights here - "Driven', 'Totem', the title track, but much of the lyrics are cliche at best and downright blah much of the time. It's an album I really can't remember when I listened to last or when I'll listen to again. T4E isn't Neil grasping at something to write about, it is Neil describing a society which is grasping at something to care about. That's why I think the lyrics work so well and were such a refreshing change from the previous album. Wow. T4E an improvement over CP? Whatchu talking about, Willis? But besides that, and as Rushgoober points out above, some of these lyrics are simply insipid attempts at depth and social commenary - but there's nothing specific. I mean, how much interaction with and knowledge of "tough talking hood boys" did Neil EVER have? Or the forced and stale time metaphor in "Dog Years" - which is really nothing more than a weak rehash of "Time Stand Still"? At this point, before the tragedies, the only totem pole Neil was dancing around was his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lifeson90 Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I love dog years.. One of the bands finest actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think you have to consider the contexts of each album. VT is Neil's grief expression, his bildungsroman of sorrow and pain and escape, questioning, and tentative rebirth. As such, it's going to be a dark, somewhat inaccessible album because it's so personal. There're highlights, of course - the choruses of 'Ghost Rider" (and I love the many meanings and ambiguities of that title!) and 'Ceiling Unlimited', the sheer dominance of 'Freeze', the musicality of "Stars...". But like the production, it can be a muddled and difficult album. Still, it was prety refreshing when it came out. T4E seems to be Neil grasping at something to write about. After the dominant themes of the last two albums (chance in RTB and opposition in CP), clutching at the straws of the emerging dot com zeitgeist seems weak and naive in retrospect. There are some musical highlights here - "Driven', 'Totem', the title track, but much of the lyrics are cliche at best and downright blah much of the time. It's an album I really can't remember when I listened to last or when I'll listen to again. T4E isn't Neil grasping at something to write about, it is Neil describing a society which is grasping at something to care about. That's why I think the lyrics work so well and were such a refreshing change from the previous album. Wow. T4E an improvement over CP? Whatchu talking about, Willis? But besides that, and as Rushgoober points out above, some of these lyrics are simply insipid attempts at depth and social commenary - but there's nothing specific. I mean, how much interaction with and knowledge of "tough talking hood boys" did Neil EVER have? Or the forced and stale time metaphor in "Dog Years" - which is really nothing more than a weak rehash of "Time Stand Still"? At this point, before the tragedies, the only totem pole Neil was dancing around was his own. I like those lyrics. Stronger than most of CP, except maybe Animate and Nobody's Hero. I won't quote CP lyrics as I don't want to induce too much vomalaughing (when you laugh and vomit at the same time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I like Counterparts better that T4E, which isn't saying much because I was never overly thrilled with CP either, but it has grown on me in recent years. Test for Echo, however, have never grown on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coventry Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 Vomalaugh - kind of like a "chucklespew". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShlappinDahBass Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I love dog years.. One of the bands finest actually I uh....what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGr8imL84AD8inF8sBlackSedan Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I like Counterparts better that T4E, which isn't saying much because I was never overly thrilled with CP either, but it has grown on me in recent years. Test for Echo, however, have never grown on me. I agree and feel the same way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sin City Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 As asked a few pages ago, does anyone from the UK rate Counterparts, as I've never read or seen a positive view of that record over here?? Too many circular arguments here and other albums being brought into the debate that were not part of the OP's poll. Not sure why you're talking about Counterparts on a Test for Echo/Vapor Trails thread, then... I personally have no problem, but according to your post, you do. 1) Several posters have mentioned counterparts in this thread as well as other albums that aren't strictly part of the OP's question which I addressed in my original post so I'm unsure why my post has been singled out? 2) I have no problem with Counterparts other than it's a very well recorded and very good sounding turd of a record bereft of most of the things that make Rush the band they are. 3) It seems that you have a problem and struggle to cope with somebody having a different perspective on what I truly consider to be one of the worst albums the band recorded. Speed of love? Alien Shore? Stick it Out? 4) British fans liking this record- it's an honest question as I have yet to find a british fan of this one. Perhaps our B/S detectors our more highly attuned over here to this kind of thing? :poke: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retrospective Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 As asked a few pages ago, does anyone from the UK rate Counterparts, as I've never read or seen a positive view of that record over here?? Too many circular arguments here and other albums being brought into the debate that were not part of the OP's poll. Not sure why you're talking about Counterparts on a Test for Echo/Vapor Trails thread, then... I personally have no problem, but according to your post, you do. 1) Several posters have mentioned counterparts in this thread as well as other albums that aren't strictly part of the OP's question which I addressed in my original post so I'm unsure why my post has been singled out? 2) I have no problem with Counterparts other than it's a very well recorded and very good sounding turd of a record bereft of most of the things that make Rush the band they are. 3) It seems that you have a problem and struggle to cope with somebody having a different perspective on what I truly consider to be one of the worst albums the band recorded. Speed of love? Alien Shore? Stick it Out? 4) British fans liking this record- it's an honest question as I have yet to find a british fan of this one. Perhaps our B/S detectors our more highly attuned over here to this kind of thing? :poke: I... What? I was just saying that you were contradicting yourself. I also said I have no problem with CP talk. Which is what I said. In my post. That's it. I'm not "struggling" with anything.. And I'm not attacking you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShlappinDahBass Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 As asked a few pages ago, does anyone from the UK rate Counterparts, as I've never read or seen a positive view of that record over here?? Too many circular arguments here and other albums being brought into the debate that were not part of the OP's poll. Not sure why you're talking about Counterparts on a Test for Echo/Vapor Trails thread, then... I personally have no problem, but according to your post, you do. 1) Several posters have mentioned counterparts in this thread as well as other albums that aren't strictly part of the OP's question which I addressed in my original post so I'm unsure why my post has been singled out? 2) I have no problem with Counterparts other than it's a very well recorded and very good sounding turd of a record bereft of most of the things that make Rush the band they are. 3) It seems that you have a problem and struggle to cope with somebody having a different perspective on what I truly consider to be one of the worst albums the band recorded. Speed of love? Alien Shore? Stick it Out? 4) British fans liking this record- it's an honest question as I have yet to find a british fan of this one. Perhaps our B/S detectors our more highly attuned over here to this kind of thing? :poke: I... What? I was just saying that you were contradicting yourself. I also said I have no problem with CP talk. Which is what I said. In my post. That's it. I'm not "struggling" with anything.. And I'm not attacking you. Yeah. Got a bit on the defensive side randomly. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now