rushgoober Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:52 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 04:46 PM) QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Aug 29 2012, 04:42 PM) QUOTE (presto123 @ Aug 28 2012, 12:51 AM) Nobody has yet to respond how the plants are changed at a cellular level in many crop circles and how soil samples are different inside the circle. There is no way to hoax that. Plus there is such a preciseness and scale to many of these that I find hoaxing hard to believe. Not saying it is other wordly visitors either but there is an eeriness to these. http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2002...rd-science.html read it. mumbo jumbo. the plants "decided to change at the cellular level" is ridiculous. Edit: it doesn't have to be a hoax. Some are pranks and some are art installations, etc... As I've stated many times, there is no winning with people who don't want to believe in anything supernatural or unexplainable. They cry prove it, and even when you try to with people who've studied the phenomena scientifically, if it doesn't fit in with their beliefs, it's pseudo-science or mumbo jumbo. Which is why I've been wondering why you're repeating yourself relentlessly. am i any more than you are? it doesn't matter. everyone is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomesickAlien Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Not Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 05:00 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:52 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 04:46 PM) QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Aug 29 2012, 04:42 PM) QUOTE (presto123 @ Aug 28 2012, 12:51 AM) Nobody has yet to respond how the plants are changed at a cellular level in many crop circles and how soil samples are different inside the circle. There is no way to hoax that. Plus there is such a preciseness and scale to many of these that I find hoaxing hard to believe. Not saying it is other wordly visitors either but there is an eeriness to these. http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2002...rd-science.html read it. mumbo jumbo. the plants "decided to change at the cellular level" is ridiculous. Edit: it doesn't have to be a hoax. Some are pranks and some are art installations, etc... As I've stated many times, there is no winning with people who don't want to believe in anything supernatural or unexplainable. They cry prove it, and even when you try to with people who've studied the phenomena scientifically, if it doesn't fit in with their beliefs, it's pseudo-science or mumbo jumbo. Which is why I've been wondering why you're repeating yourself relentlessly. am i any more than you are? it doesn't matter. everyone is right. By quite a bit I'd say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Principled Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 07:00 PM)everyone is right. ^^^ A classic way to avoid admitting that you're wrong or even might be wrong about something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Not Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (Workaholic Man @ Aug 29 2012, 06:03 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 07:00 PM)everyone is right. ^^^ A classic way to avoid admitting that you're wrong or even might be wrong about something. "You're just closed minded. Too deaf to hear and too blind to see." -rushgoober There. Responded for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 07:02 PM) QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Empirical evidence is based on observations. Observation has been proven to alter outcomes. Science is suspect if not complete nonsense. All kidding aside, you guys take all the fun out of my Mystic Rythms. That's my only complaint. You're boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Ya gotta love deconstructionism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomesickAlien Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 08:08 PM)QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 07:02 PM) QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Science is suspect if not complete nonsense. Spoken like a true believer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 08:14 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 08:08 PM)QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 07:02 PM) QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Science is suspect if not complete nonsense. Spoken like a true believer. Shh...I'm tryin to take this whole science thing with logic and am having some difficulty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Not Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:08 PM) QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 07:02 PM) QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Empirical evidence is based on observations. Observation has been proven to alter outcomes. Science is suspect if not complete nonsense. All kidding aside, you guys take all the fun out of my Mystic Rythms. That's my only complaint. You're boring. You just have yet to find how astounding reality is is all refer to AW's post earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Principled Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 08:07 PM)QUOTE (Workaholic Man @ Aug 29 2012, 06:03 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 29 2012, 07:00 PM)everyone is right. ^^^ A classic way to avoid admitting that you're wrong or even might be wrong about something. "You're just closed minded. Too deaf to hear and too blind to see." -rushgoober There. Responded for him You know, I would be absolutely thrilled if there were magic in the world, supernatural forces to awe us......heck, I'd be utterly fascinated if there were an actual deity in existence. The trouble is that my wanting it to exist doesn't make it exist. My hopes and dreams have no effect. Other people telling me to "believe" are just making fools of themselves. The current belief in the supernatural is exactly the same as that of millennia ago. It's based on ignorance and the fear of not having all the answers to the mysteries of life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 08:21 PM) QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 08:14 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 08:08 PM)QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 07:02 PM) QUOTE (snowdogged @ Aug 29 2012, 06:32 PM)QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 29 2012, 06:21 PM) QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Aug 29 2012, 04:47 PM) QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 28 2012, 04:10 PM) What I don't get? Science Person: "Prove this supernatural thing!" Believer "See - I proved it!" Science Person "See it was science after all!" So, my point is that for a science person there can NEVER be supernatural anything because once it's proven, it falls under their realm of "Science". *YAWN* Science persons are typically called scientists. A "Science person" is someone who believes in science. I go to church, it doesn't make me a reverend or a priest. Are you saying that you do not believe in science? Nobody should believe in science. They should accept it's conclusions based on empirical evidence. Belief should be reserved for entities or phenomena for which there is no such evidence. Science is suspect if not complete nonsense. Spoken like a true believer. Shh...I'm tryin to take this whole science thing with logic and am having some difficulty. I just don't want to stare into the existential void of inevitable decay, failure and non-existance. At least not today. I would rather play make believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Plus! You guys have NO idea if there are aliens. And for the SHEER number of planets in the universe you HAVE to admit that there is likely life out there! And there is SOME probability, from physics, that wormholes could exist. And you HAVE to admit that most aliens like drawing patterns crops - Who wouldn't?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSnwdog Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Principled Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Shrimp_Cot Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Principled Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomesickAlien Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 http://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s410/datura67/cb7645ab.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowdogged Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (substancewithoutstyle @ Aug 29 2012, 09:37 PM) http://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s410/datura67/cb7645ab.jpg Now we have proof that aliens do actually do the crop circles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now