Jag2112 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Considering the source, this isn't that bad of an interview... Neil Peart On Rush's New LP and Being a 'Bleeding Heart Libertarian' Enjoy- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godeater2112 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 No surprise the assholes couldn't even get the name of the album right! Between Revolver Mag and The Golden Gods Awards, it's nice to know that everyone is sick of the garbage from RRHOF and these clowns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancient Ways Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 thanks for the link. enjoyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Jun 12 2012, 07:06 PM) thanks for the link. enjoyed it. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAccountant Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Thanks for posting - very interesting. Note that he mentioned that "the next 2 years are mapped out". Hmmmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnoble Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) it always cracks me up how utterly horrified Rolling Stone is that anyone could possibly like or agree with Ayn Rand's writings. If I was Neil I would have stuck up for myself a little more instead of quickly dismissing his 2112 era thinking. For a magazine that likes to tout themselves as so open minded, they sure don't act that way when it comes to politics Edited June 13, 2012 by jnoble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancient Ways Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 QUOTE (jnoble @ Jun 12 2012, 11:58 PM) it always cracks me up how utterly horrified Rolling Stone is that anyone could possibly like or agree with Ayn Rand's writings. If I was Neil I would have stuck up for myself a little more instead of quickly dismissing his 2112 era thinking. For a magazine that likes to tout themselves as so open minded, they sure don't act that way when it comes to politics Bringing up Rand in 2012 is ridiculous and shows how unfamiliar the interviewer is with their music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I don't care how cool Peart might sound in that interview... I refuse to read it because it's cocksmoke Rolling Stone. ((absolutely no offense intended to op)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EveryNerveAware Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Jun 12 2012, 11:01 PM) QUOTE (jnoble @ Jun 12 2012, 11:58 PM) it always cracks me up how utterly horrified Rolling Stone is that anyone could possibly like or agree with Ayn Rand's writings. If I was Neil I would have stuck up for myself a little more instead of quickly dismissing his 2112 era thinking. For a magazine that likes to tout themselves as so open minded, they sure don't act that way when it comes to politics Bringing up Rand in 2012 is ridiculous and shows how unfamiliar the interviewer is with their music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancient Ways Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Jun 13 2012, 07:19 AM) I don't care how cool Peart might sound in that interview... I refuse to read it because it's cocksmoke Rolling Stone. ((absolutely no offense intended to op)) I get what you're saying but if Neil was cool with it then I will go along. If anyone should be offended it's the band, not me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Principled Man Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Jun 12 2012, 11:01 PM)QUOTE (jnoble @ Jun 12 2012, 11:58 PM) it always cracks me up how utterly horrified Rolling Stone is that anyone could possibly like or agree with Ayn Rand's writings. If I was Neil I would have stuck up for myself a little more instead of quickly dismissing his 2112 era thinking. For a magazine that likes to tout themselves as so open minded, they sure don't act that way when it comes to politics Bringing up Rand in 2012 is ridiculous and shows how unfamiliar the interviewer is with their music. It also shows that Rush is still being pigeon-holed by the Music Establishment. When you say the name "Rush", the Establishment STILL thinks automatically of Geddy's shrieking vocals, Peart's Randian lyrics, and their "pretentious" prog-rock. Rags like Rolling Stone still define Rush as they were in the 70's, and there is no hope of them ever changing their perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Jun 14 2012, 07:55 AM)QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Jun 13 2012, 07:19 AM) I don't care how cool Peart might sound in that interview... I refuse to read it because it's cocksmoke Rolling Stone. ((absolutely no offense intended to op)) I get what you're saying but if Neil was cool with it then I will go along. If anyone should be offended it's the band, not me. I'm not offended and I see your point. But just because Neil is cool with being asked questions by fuckwits doesn't mean I want to read his replies to those fuckwits. Know what I'm sayin'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancient Ways Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Jun 14 2012, 07:33 AM) QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Jun 14 2012, 07:55 AM)QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Jun 13 2012, 07:19 AM) I don't care how cool Peart might sound in that interview... I refuse to read it because it's cocksmoke Rolling Stone. ((absolutely no offense intended to op)) I get what you're saying but if Neil was cool with it then I will go along. If anyone should be offended it's the band, not me. I'm not offended and I see your point. But just because Neil is cool with being asked questions by fuckwits doesn't mean I want to read his replies to those fuckwits. Know what I'm sayin'? Oh yeah. I read it for free. Definitely would not give them $$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThinkingBig Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 QUOTE (TheAccountant @ Jun 12 2012, 07:59 PM) Thanks for posting - very interesting. Note that he mentioned that "the next 2 years are mapped out". Hmmmm. 2012 - 2013 2 years. No R40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Caress Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 QUOTE (ThinkingBig @ Jun 14 2012, 09:35 PM) QUOTE (TheAccountant @ Jun 12 2012, 07:59 PM) Thanks for posting - very interesting. Note that he mentioned that "the next 2 years are mapped out". Hmmmm. 2012 - 2013 2 years. No R40. Well, the Time Machine tour came pretty quick after S/A. But yes, depending on how much they tour in the next year, they will probably take a year off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now