fonzbear2000 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Quite some time ago, I was PM'ed by a mod and asked to lower the size of the picture in my signature. Well, I've noticed that there are some sigs with HUGE pictures. Examples: http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?show...dpost&p=2131595 http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?show...dpost&p=2128532 http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?show...dpost&p=2128757 http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?show...dpost&p=2096022 http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?show...dpost&p=1980119 Also, I can't find it, but there's a user on here with a black and white pic of Geddy. So, are we now allowed to have gigantic signatures? And if not, shouldn't the members in the above examples be asked to change theirs? Even though, mine is pretty big as well so maybe the rule was changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonzbear2000 Posted November 24, 2010 Author Share Posted November 24, 2010 Any thoughts on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 No, the rules haven't changed. The same size restriction still applies, and the restriction is that the size of your sig -- all content combined -- must not exceed the following example, no matter what size screen you have, or what resolution you're using. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/1001001/TRF%20Sigs/sig_size.gif fonz, we never mind the opportunity to remind everyone about this, so thanks for the thread. There are so many members here now, and we mods simply can't police every person's sig. However, you could have simply said something like, "So, are we now allowed to have gigantic signatures? I'm noticing some big sigs out there now," instead of complaining about how you were asked to trim your sig while calling others out for theirs. Makes you look like a tattletale, you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 sigs are something people smoke aren't they or are they fagsss?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (treeduck @ Nov 24 2010, 02:32 AM) sigs are something people smoke aren't they or are they fagsss?? You mean "cigs," you silly person? And how you Brits thought "f-gs" was a good name for cigarettes is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Limelight* Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Mines just text That ok how it is? I don't feel like changing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (*Limelight* @ Nov 24 2010, 02:56 AM) Mines just text That ok how it is? I don't feel like changing it Is it bigger than the example I gave up there? Nope, not even close. You is good. Thank you for playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TullSkull Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Got the size I think... Keep this bumped, as there are a few that are out of size.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babycat Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Mine's okay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladirushfan80 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I know that my sig definitely jives with the North American Standard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (TullSkull @ Nov 24 2010, 08:09 AM) Got the size I think... Keep this bumped, as there are a few that are out of size.... Nope, yours is too big. Make a post with this image in it, and compare it to your sig. If your sig is taller and/or wider than the image, it's too big. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/1001001/TRF%20Sigs/sig_size.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostworks Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Nov 24 2010, 11:09 AM) ...if your sig is taller and/or wider than the image, it's too big. ^ and for those that don't/won't modify their sigs to comply? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mara Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Along the same lines, why is it that I have trouble viewing some posts due to their size? BeOhBeBob's ALWAYS run off the screen for me - I have to scroll horizontally to be able to see everything. This is not a crippling issue for me - I am just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janie Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rummut71 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 2 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users): rummut71, ghostworks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostworks Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (rummut71 @ Nov 24 2010, 11:53 AM) 2 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users): rummut71, ghostworks beat it, the both of ye! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushlady23 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (ghostworks @ Nov 24 2010, 11:37 AM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Nov 24 2010, 11:09 AM) ...if your sig is taller and/or wider than the image, it's too big. ^ and for those that don't/won't modify their sigs to comply? The sig restriction is just a guideline, not a rigid "follow this or die" rule (sorry to disappoint you ). Huge sigs are annoying and were getting way out of hand here, and this is an effort to keep them reasonable. When we suggest to someone that their sig is too big, most of them are adults about it and do some trimming. Contrary to what you seem to believe, this isn't boot camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TullSkull Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 QUOTE (TullSkull @ Nov 24 2010, 04:24 PM) That looks good now! Definitely close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdFireYYZ Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Mines fixed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonzbear2000 Posted November 25, 2010 Author Share Posted November 25, 2010 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Nov 24 2010, 02:27 AM) No, the rules haven't changed. The same size restriction still applies, and the restriction is that the size of your sig -- all content combined -- must not exceed the following example, no matter what size screen you have, or what resolution you're using. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/1001001/TRF%20Sigs/sig_size.gif fonz, we never mind the opportunity to remind everyone about this, so thanks for the thread. There are so many members here now, and we mods simply can't police every person's sig. However, you could have simply said something like, "So, are we now allowed to have gigantic signatures? I'm noticing some big sigs out there now," instead of complaining about how you were asked to trim your sig while calling others out for theirs. Makes you look like a tattletale, you know? I see your point. While I'm not trying to be a tattletale, I can see how the way I worded it makes me come across as one. The way you worded it is what I meant to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.