Snowdog Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Just watched this week's episode. What a twist at the end. I didn't see that one coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladirushfan80 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 QUOTE (Snowdog @ Apr 4 2006, 09:06 PM) Just watched this week's episode. What a twist at the end. I didn't see that one coming uh.... nope... neither did I... SHOCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blonde77th Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 I watch 24 faithfully !! I think this season is their best yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowdog Posted April 10, 2006 Share Posted April 10, 2006 Tick Tock. 1 hour and 15 minutes and counting. This is gonna be good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 11, 2006 Author Share Posted April 11, 2006 If anybody recorded tonight's ep, please PM me...I'll pay to have it shipped to me...something impotrant prevented me from seeing it tonight and I'm PISSED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 10 2006, 07:02 PM) If anybody recorded tonight's ep, please PM me...I'll pay to have it shipped to me...something impotrant prevented me from seeing it tonight and I'm PISSED. Wish I knew, I usually tape it for a friend but she didn't have to work and told me not to bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
launchpad67a Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 10 2006, 08:02 PM) If anybody recorded tonight's ep, please PM me...I'll pay to have it shipped to me...something impotrant prevented me from seeing it tonight and I'm PISSED. Oh dude, you missed a great one. The secret was revealed!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladirushfan80 Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 10 2006, 11:02 PM) If anybody recorded tonight's ep, please PM me...I'll pay to have it shipped to me...something impotrant prevented me from seeing it tonight and I'm PISSED. i can hook you up...... pm me back!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladirushfan80 Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 'in cuz it's on tonight!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowdog Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Tick, Tock. 3:20 and counting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 18, 2006 Author Share Posted April 18, 2006 Those scenes with Heller and Logan were HEAVY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 18, 2006 Author Share Posted April 18, 2006 So, what happened to Agent Pierce? Taken away? Killed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lerxstforever Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 I hope Pierce wasn't killed, it looked like he had just figured out that Logan was in on everything, with him gone it might take Martha longer to figure everything out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowdog Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Tick Tock. 3:13 and counting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 If you're not already watching!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 25, 2006 Author Share Posted April 25, 2006 THAT WAS INTENSE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowdog Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 10:01 PM) THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> It certainly was. Is Heller dead too? Or will he miraculously survive??? Tune in next week, same JackTime, same JackChannel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 02:43 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Well then, why can't we have a little more freedom with html code, some of us would like to play with it? It's allowed in signatures but not in posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RushRevisited Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 07:47 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 02:43 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Well then, why can't we have a little more freedom with html code, some of us would like to play with it? It's allowed in signatures but not in posts? No HTML in posts. Security risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RushRevisited Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 06:43 PM) QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. It got in there because the board translates what you want in your post into a readable HTML post in that case, SPAN tag being used in place of DIV... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 QUOTE (RushRevisited @ Apr 26 2006, 05:33 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 07:47 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 02:43 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Well then, why can't we have a little more freedom with html code, some of us would like to play with it? It's allowed in signatures but not in posts? No HTML in posts. Security risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted April 27, 2006 Author Share Posted April 27, 2006 QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 09:45 PM) QUOTE (RushRevisited @ Apr 26 2006, 05:33 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 07:47 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 02:43 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Well then, why can't we have a little more freedom with html code, some of us would like to play with it? It's allowed in signatures but not in posts? No HTML in posts. Security risk. Somehow, I think you'll survive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 (edited) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 06:01 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 09:45 PM) QUOTE (RushRevisited @ Apr 26 2006, 05:33 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 26 2006, 07:47 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 26 2006, 02:43 PM)QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 24 2006, 10:10 PM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Apr 24 2006, 06:01 PM)THAT<span style='font-size:16pt;line-height:100%'> WAS<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'> INTENSE</span></span> Not fair, you admin types can use HTML in your posts! Weird, that's not how I typed that. I typed it like this: [b][SIZE=7]THAT [SIZE=9]WAS [SIZE=11]INTENSE[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/b] I really don't know how that html code got in there. Well then, why can't we have a little more freedom with html code, some of us would like to play with it? It's allowed in signatures but not in posts? No HTML in posts. Security risk. Somehow, I think you'll survive. Ho, hum! Just have to limit it to my signature CSS works in signatures too Edited April 27, 2006 by Drumnut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now