nicky6 Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 This is coming from a guy who cant even shake hands with his fans or say hi and stuff. what a phony ass. http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/16/neil-peart-rand-paul-hates-women-and-bro#comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Phony, no. Ignorant, yes. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathory Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 yes, holden. a great big goddam phony 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78jazz Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 I wonder how long before this hits the SOCN. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He is not a phony. He is just not as smart as some of us thought. I am sure some of the article is out of context, but an open minded person does not rely on cliched political arguments. 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 I wonder how long before this hits the SOCN.This is why I am done with this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New World Kid Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's not a phony. He's a guy who has an opinion. Same as anyone else. Argue the opinion if you don't like it. But don't argue the man. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancient Ways Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Not sure what voting democrat has to do with shaking hands and signing autographs. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's not a phony. He's a guy who has an opinion. Same as anyone else. Argue the opinion if you don't like it. But don't argue the man.The man's opinion is based in ignorance of who Rand Paul is and what he believes and should be called out as such. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78jazz Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 I wonder how long before this hits the SOCN.This is why I am done with this thread. Sorry if I did that. It seems that is where this topic will eventually go. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's a phony, oh yes he is. He's a pseudo intellectual tool living in denial of his heavy metal past!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And his heavy metal future! :madra: 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 When anyone begins a sentence with"For a person of my sensibility .." my eyes roll .. What makes this kinda sad is that Neil tries so hard to come across as evolved and intelligent - "try" being the correct word 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New World Kid Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's not a phony. He's a guy who has an opinion. Same as anyone else. Argue the opinion if you don't like it. But don't argue the man.The man's opinion is based in ignorance of who Rand Paul is and what he believes and should be called out as such. Alrighty. That's cool. Then prove it. Just saying, it's more productive to, say, create a list of reasons why Rand Paul doesn't hate brown people and women, or provide rationale for it... Than it is to just call someone a name because they have that opinion. I'm not saying Neil's right. I'm saying refute his claim rather than attack him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanadu Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 http://i.qkme.me/352jnj.jpg Anyone else reminded of this? 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's not a phony. He's a guy who has an opinion. Same as anyone else. Argue the opinion if you don't like it. But don't argue the man.The man's opinion is based in ignorance of who Rand Paul is and what he believes and should be called out as such. Alrighty. That's cool. Then prove it. Just saying, it's more productive to, say, create a list of reasons why Rand Paul doesn't hate brown people and women, or provide rationale for it... Than it is to just call someone a name because they have that opinion. I'm not saying Neil's right. I'm saying refute his claim rather than attack him.Google Rand Paul and Guatemala. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Just because a person is against the health care acts that "benefit" the poor does NOT make them racist ... But the fact that Neil thinks that only "brown people" would fall under the heading of "poor" certainly makes him look racist 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaked Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Just because you happen to disagree with him does not make him a phony or ignorant. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 He's not a phony. He's a guy who has an opinion. Same as anyone else. Argue the opinion if you don't like it. But don't argue the man.The man's opinion is based in ignorance of who Rand Paul is and what he believes and should be called out as such. Alrighty. That's cool. Then prove it. Just saying, it's more productive to, say, create a list of reasons why Rand Paul doesn't hate brown people and women, or provide rationale for it... Than it is to just call someone a name because they have that opinion. I'm not saying Neil's right. I'm saying refute his claim rather than attack him.Mr Drum God provided no evidence for his claims. Because he's got nothing. Rand Paul has been the most outspoken candidate on issues important to the black community such as overzealous policing and restoration of voting rights to felons who have served their time, and has stressed outreach to minority views and has criticized his party for their lack of appeal to minorities...He's also the most anti-war candidate with a chance to win in either major party...you'd think Peart would be predisposed to like that. Apparently he hasn't done the first bit of research about it. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Just because you happen to disagree with him does not make him a phony or ignorant.See post 18 and then look up the word ignorant. It applies in spades to Mr. Peart here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaked Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Just because you happen to disagree with him does not make him a phony or ignorant.See post 18 and then look up the word ignorant. It applies in spades to Mr. Peart here. Look in the mirror. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geddy's Soul Patch Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Sure Neil, the "Christian" (wtf??) thing to do is provide mass amounts of shit f***ing healthcare at everybody's expense with absolutely zero chance of real medical innovation. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Just because you happen to disagree with him does not make him a phony or ignorant.See post 18 and then look up the word ignorant. It applies in spades to Mr. Peart here. Look in the mirror.Well, THAT was substantive... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New World Kid Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Mr Drum God provided no evidence for his claims. "Mr. Drum God" also didn't publish the quote, so he had no means to provide evidence. We have no idea what else was or was not said. Maybe that was an excerpt of a 15 minute dissertation Peart gave to the man. Which would actually be WAY more Neil's style, boring the hell out of someone in a long, monotone droning sort of way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 I suppose, given RSs recent record of journalistic integrity, misquoting him or taking his quotes out of context is possible. However, it's doubtful that RS would suppress anything that would make a member of the GOP look bad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 73 is gonna stamp down on this thread pretty soon... http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/100322_cn3wildemonty_p323.jpg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now