Jump to content

Mars Landing!


Union 5-3992
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 20 2012, 01:04 PM)
Wake me up when we've built bases up there and on the moon...

schla03.gif schla03.gif schla03.gif

Better go into cryogenic stasis. It's gonna take us a while..... laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Workaholic Man @ Aug 20 2012, 01:32 PM)
QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 20 2012, 01:04 PM)
Wake me up when we've built bases up there and on the moon...

schla03.gif  schla03.gif  schla03.gif

Better go into cryogenic stasis. It's gonna take us a while..... laugh.gif

laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 20 2012, 01:04 PM)
Wake me up when we've built bases up there and on the moon...

schla03.gif  schla03.gif  schla03.gif

Considering it's been over 40 years since we landed on the moon, we should've progressed further by now and we should have something else on Mars besides the rovers.

 

This plan should've already been started:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming_of_Mars

 

I still think it's a good thing the new rover is there but I think were behind a lot of years when it comes to doing something serious and worthwhile on Mars.

Edited by J2112YYZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 22 2012, 02:56 PM)
I saw some of the press conference earlier and I was thinking to myself why am I not as excited about this dust-pushing machine as those scientists seem to be? I thought about it and realised I would have been excited about it if it was 1977...

Those scientists get so little funding and opportunities to explore the solar system that any successful mission is like Christmas x 1,000. It's akin to an NFL player finally winning the Super Bowl after playing 20 years!

 

We're lucky we even got the Viking probes launched in the 70's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Workaholic Man @ Aug 22 2012, 04:58 PM)
QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 22 2012, 02:56 PM)
I saw some of the press conference earlier and I was thinking to myself why am I not as excited about this dust-pushing machine as those scientists seem to be? I thought about it and realised I would have been excited about it if it was 1977...

Those scientists get so little funding and opportunities to explore the solar system that any successful mission is like Christmas x 1,000. It's akin to an NFL player finally winning the Super Bowl after playing 20 years!

 

We're lucky we even got the Viking probes launched in the 70's.

And the Voyagers...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (My_Shrimp_Cot @ Aug 23 2012, 06:40 PM)
http://www.wimp.com/curiositydescent/


wimp.com - one of my favourite sites. Or favorite for us USers.

1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif 1022.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curiosity would like you to view this photo of the base of Mount Sharp

 

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/681056main_pia16105ano.jpg

 

For scale, the pointy mound (about 9.3 kilometers away from Curiosity) in the center of the image, looming above the highlighted rover-sized rock, is about 1,000 feet (300 meters) across and 300 feet (100 meters) high.

Edited by burgeranacoke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (treeduck @ Aug 24 2012, 03:39 AM)
I wonder what the Total Recall people up there will make of it?

wacko.gif

http://abesauer.com/__oneclick_uploads/2009/04/total-recall.gif -- I don't like it!!

Edited by Workaholic Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (burgeranacoke @ Aug 28 2012, 10:36 AM)
Curiosity would like you to view this photo of the base of Mount Sharp

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/681056main_pia16105ano.jpg

For scale, the pointy mound (about 9.3 kilometers away from Curiosity) in the center of the image, looming above the highlighted rover-sized rock, is about 1,000 feet (300 meters) across and 300 feet (100 meters) high.

I'm no geologist but in looking at this picture you can see striations that look like sediment layers and some of the canyons look like they may have been formed by water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The awesome beauty of that landscape, so Earth-like, is marred by one fairly important detail:

 

If you go for a stroll out there without your space suit on, you will die. ohmy.gif

 

What an inconvenience......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE
I'm no geologist but in looking at this picture you can see striations that look like sediment layers and some of the canyons look like they may have been formed by water.

 

Yep.... to my untrained eye it looks like massive flooding, wind-born layers typically form units that are less laterally continuous than seen here. Cross-bedded sandstones are indicative of wind deposition, as seen in the US southwest.

 

Like this...

http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/gaia_chapter_5/dunes.jpg

Edited by burgeranacoke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...