Jump to content

They BLEW it!!


Slime
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (ReflectedLight @ Jan 29 2011, 09:43 AM)
QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Jan 29 2011, 09:37 AM)
QUOTE (laughedatbytime @ Jan 29 2011, 09:05 AM)
QUOTE (Middle Kingdom @ Jan 29 2011, 07:51 AM)
The 2004 Yankees will be the all time winners of this thread.
They were built to win, and had the greatest closer of all time on the mound in the 9th inning with the lead. No way this series should not have been a sweep.

The 1942 Red Wings would be next for blowing a 3-0 series lead like the Yankees, in the Stanley Cup finals.

The 2010 Bruins would then be third for achieving the same feat in last year's second round of the NHL playoffs.


I'd agree with GerryRulz, that the seasonal choke award goes to the 78 Red Sox.

Buckner's bonehead error was huge, and lost game 6,
but no one seems to remember that had he made the play, it was still a tie game, and the Sox could have easily lost in another inning on a non-booted play.

That and the Sox were up 3-0 with Hurst in control through 5 innings in game 7.

For in season chokes:

 

I'm not sure that the 64 Phils or the 51 Dodgers weren't bigger choke artists than the 78 Bosox.

 

The 64 Phils had a 6.5 game lead with 12 to play and lost 10 in a row

 

The 51 Dodgers were 13.5 up on Aug 11 and lost the pennant in a playoff

 

The 78 Bosox were up on the Yanks by 14.5 in July (though the Yanks weren't in second at the time), and had lost the lead in early to mid September. They then won 11 of their last 13 to force a playoff. The Boston Massacre (Sept 7-10) may have been the most disastrous regular season series ever, with the Yanks winning all four games against Boston in Fenway, 15-3, 13-2, 7-0, and 7-4.

 

You could make an argument for any of these.

I think the Mets collapse in '07 actually beats out the '64 Phillies. And this writer says it actually is worse than the '04 Yanks.

 

=============================

 

Why the 2007 Mets' Collapse is the Worst in MLB History

The Mets Are the Biggest Chokers of Them All

 

By Zac Wassink

 

This is the third piece in a series of articles I will be writing for an Associated Content "magazine" of sorts regarding the collapse of the 2007 New York Mets. Being a fan of the Mets, these pieces will most likely not have the same tone or nature of my other articles. They will be from the point of view of the fan and not the analyst. Hopefully these articles will give some insight on the greatest collapse in the history of Major League Baseball as well as allow us, the fans of the New York Mets, some much needed peace heading into the 2008 season.

Statistically speaking, nothing like the collapse of the 2007 New York Mets had ever happened before. No team in history had ever coughed up a seven game lead with only three weeks left in the season. Is it the biggest collapse in the history of professional sports? It's definitely up there. The 2007 New York Mets are without a doubt guilty of the biggest choke/collapse/cough-up/whatever you want to call it in the history of Major League Baseball.

Many Mets fans are pointing to the Yankees of 2004 as the biggest choke-job in Major League Baseball history. That team, as is well known, took a 3-0 lead in the ALCS against the Boston Red Sox before losing four straight, the first team to ever lose a series after taking the first three games in the history of the Major Leagues. Nice try, Mets fans. It's time for fans to realize that the collapse of the 2007 is even worse than what the Yankees "accomplished" in 2004. Here are the reasons why that is true.

 

First reason why the 2007 Mets' collapse is the worst in MLB History: The Mets lost to bad teams at home

 

Regardless of the fact that the Yankees had a 3-0 in the ALCS, they were still playing a very good team. Schilling, Martinez, Lowe, Ramirez, Ortiz, and Damon are just the big names that were playing for the Red Sox in 2004. The 2007 Mets finished just one game behind the Phillies in the NL East. That means that all the Mets had to do was win two more games during their home stand at the end of the season in order to win the NL East. Instead, the Mets lost to the Nationals (73-89), the Cardinals (78-84) and the Marlins (71-91) in six out of the last seven games of the season. I want to reiterate that all of those games were played at Shea. At least in 2004 the Yankees only dropped the final two games of the series at home.

 

Second reason why the 2007 Mets' collapse is the worst in MLB History: They had two distinct chances to bury the Phillies

 

At the end of August the Mets played a four-game series at Philadelphia. At that point New York still had the division well in hand. A split of the series would have done huge damage to the psyche of the Phillies, not to mention all but end the chance that Philly would come back and take the NL East. Instead, the Mets got swept on the road in a series that included Billy Wagner blowing the final game after the Mets made a comeback of their own by scoring five runs in the top of the eighth.

In the middle of September the two teams faced off again, this time at Shea. The Mets had just finished taking two out of three from the Atlanta Braves, thus completely burying the Braves in the NL East. Instead of doing the same to the Phillies the Mets were swept again, blowing leads in the first two games of the series. How big are those two games now? Those two games are the difference between the Mets playing baseball in October and sitting on the couch watching those ridiculous Dane Cook "Actober" commercials.

 

Those two reasons say it all. The 2007 New York Mets were in a position that any team would love to be in. They had a sizeable lead heading into the last month of the year and they had the schedule in their favor. The Mets had a chance to bury the second place team at home and blew it. Then, when all they had to do was win three out of seven games to make the playoffs the Mets were playing terrible teams at home. There is no reason that the Mets should not be playing in the playoffs this season. That is why the 2007 Mets are guilty of the biggest choke in the history of Major League Baseball.

at least they have a nice new stadium. trink39.gif

Indeed! Mets/Phillies is great rivalry, and Id rather duke it out with the Mets than the Braves smile.gif 1287.gif trink39.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Jan 29 2011, 10:02 AM)
QUOTE (ReflectedLight @ Jan 29 2011, 09:43 AM)
QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Jan 29 2011, 09:37 AM)
QUOTE (laughedatbytime @ Jan 29 2011, 09:05 AM)
QUOTE (Middle Kingdom @ Jan 29 2011, 07:51 AM)
The 2004 Yankees will be the all time winners of this thread.
They were built to win, and had the greatest closer of all time on the mound in the 9th inning with the lead. No way this series should not have been a sweep.

The 1942 Red Wings would be next for blowing a 3-0 series lead like the Yankees, in the Stanley Cup finals.

The 2010 Bruins would then be third for achieving the same feat in last year's second round of the NHL playoffs.


I'd agree with GerryRulz, that the seasonal choke award goes to the 78 Red Sox.

Buckner's bonehead error was huge, and lost game 6,
but no one seems to remember that had he made the play, it was still a tie game, and the Sox could have easily lost in another inning on a non-booted play.

That and the Sox were up 3-0 with Hurst in control through 5 innings in game 7.

For in season chokes:

 

I'm not sure that the 64 Phils or the 51 Dodgers weren't bigger choke artists than the 78 Bosox.

 

The 64 Phils had a 6.5 game lead with 12 to play and lost 10 in a row

 

The 51 Dodgers were 13.5 up on Aug 11 and lost the pennant in a playoff

 

The 78 Bosox were up on the Yanks by 14.5 in July (though the Yanks weren't in second at the time), and had lost the lead in early to mid September. They then won 11 of their last 13 to force a playoff. The Boston Massacre (Sept 7-10) may have been the most disastrous regular season series ever, with the Yanks winning all four games against Boston in Fenway, 15-3, 13-2, 7-0, and 7-4.

 

You could make an argument for any of these.

I think the Mets collapse in '07 actually beats out the '64 Phillies. And this writer says it actually is worse than the '04 Yanks.

 

=============================

 

Why the 2007 Mets' Collapse is the Worst in MLB History

The Mets Are the Biggest Chokers of Them All

 

By Zac Wassink

 

This is the third piece in a series of articles I will be writing for an Associated Content "magazine" of sorts regarding the collapse of the 2007 New York Mets. Being a fan of the Mets, these pieces will most likely not have the same tone or nature of my other articles. They will be from the point of view of the fan and not the analyst. Hopefully these articles will give some insight on the greatest collapse in the history of Major League Baseball as well as allow us, the fans of the New York Mets, some much needed peace heading into the 2008 season.

Statistically speaking, nothing like the collapse of the 2007 New York Mets had ever happened before. No team in history had ever coughed up a seven game lead with only three weeks left in the season. Is it the biggest collapse in the history of professional sports? It's definitely up there. The 2007 New York Mets are without a doubt guilty of the biggest choke/collapse/cough-up/whatever you want to call it in the history of Major League Baseball.

Many Mets fans are pointing to the Yankees of 2004 as the biggest choke-job in Major League Baseball history. That team, as is well known, took a 3-0 lead in the ALCS against the Boston Red Sox before losing four straight, the first team to ever lose a series after taking the first three games in the history of the Major Leagues. Nice try, Mets fans. It's time for fans to realize that the collapse of the 2007 is even worse than what the Yankees "accomplished" in 2004. Here are the reasons why that is true.

 

First reason why the 2007 Mets' collapse is the worst in MLB History: The Mets lost to bad teams at home

 

Regardless of the fact that the Yankees had a 3-0 in the ALCS, they were still playing a very good team. Schilling, Martinez, Lowe, Ramirez, Ortiz, and Damon are just the big names that were playing for the Red Sox in 2004. The 2007 Mets finished just one game behind the Phillies in the NL East. That means that all the Mets had to do was win two more games during their home stand at the end of the season in order to win the NL East. Instead, the Mets lost to the Nationals (73-89), the Cardinals (78-84) and the Marlins (71-91) in six out of the last seven games of the season. I want to reiterate that all of those games were played at Shea. At least in 2004 the Yankees only dropped the final two games of the series at home.

 

Second reason why the 2007 Mets' collapse is the worst in MLB History: They had two distinct chances to bury the Phillies

 

At the end of August the Mets played a four-game series at Philadelphia. At that point New York still had the division well in hand. A split of the series would have done huge damage to the psyche of the Phillies, not to mention all but end the chance that Philly would come back and take the NL East. Instead, the Mets got swept on the road in a series that included Billy Wagner blowing the final game after the Mets made a comeback of their own by scoring five runs in the top of the eighth.

In the middle of September the two teams faced off again, this time at Shea. The Mets had just finished taking two out of three from the Atlanta Braves, thus completely burying the Braves in the NL East. Instead of doing the same to the Phillies the Mets were swept again, blowing leads in the first two games of the series. How big are those two games now? Those two games are the difference between the Mets playing baseball in October and sitting on the couch watching those ridiculous Dane Cook "Actober" commercials.

 

Those two reasons say it all. The 2007 New York Mets were in a position that any team would love to be in. They had a sizeable lead heading into the last month of the year and they had the schedule in their favor. The Mets had a chance to bury the second place team at home and blew it. Then, when all they had to do was win three out of seven games to make the playoffs the Mets were playing terrible teams at home. There is no reason that the Mets should not be playing in the playoffs this season. That is why the 2007 Mets are guilty of the biggest choke in the history of Major League Baseball.

at least they have a nice new stadium. trink39.gif

Indeed! Mets/Phillies is great rivalry, and Id rather duke it out with the Mets than the Braves smile.gif 1287.gif trink39.gif

absolutely! i'm sick of the braves, ted turner, and that tomahawk chop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to add the 1987 Blue Jays regular season collapse as an honorable mention.

 

With 10 games left and a 1/2 game lead over Detroit, the Jays won the 1st of 4 at home with the Tigers 4-3. The next two games saw Toronto score 3 runs in the bottom of the 9th in both contests to win 3-2 and 10-9 in heartstopping fashion, giving them a 3.5 game lead.

 

Going for the sweep on Sunday, the Jays led 2-1 in the 9th when Kirk Gibson led off with a homer to tie. Eventually Detroit won in 13 innings, reducing the lead to 2.5 instead of 4.5.

 

Toronto then played 3 at home versus the lowly Brewers.......and Milwaukee swept all 3 games. Detroit would split 2 out of 4 with Baltimore and go into the final weekend 1 game behind, with Toronto traveling to Detroit for the last 3 games. (If Toronto had won 2 of 3 vs Mil, they would have wrapped up the division).

 

Detroit would win 4-3 on Friday to tie the division after trailing 3-0 early.

Detroit would win 3-2 in 12 innings to take a 1 game lead. Toronto led 2-1 in the 5th.

 

Detroit would manage only 3 hits against Jimmy Key (17-8) on Sunday, as the Jays tried to force a 1 game playoff.

But one of them was a 1 out home run in the 2nd inning by Larry Herndon.

Toronto would not score at all, and Detroit won the division with a 1-0 victory.

 

7 consecutive losses after two of the most thrilling comeback wins.

Ouch.

Edited by Middle Kingdom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rushforumnewuser @ Apr 11 2011, 06:25 PM)
How about Rory McIlroy and his 4th round back 9 at the Masters? I felt bad for the poor kid. May he learn from the experience.

At least when he blew up to an 80 in the British he had conditions as an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...