Jack Aubrey Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazzman Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 well supposedly, a version of the script leaked online but it sucked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 what's so bad about that? i really don't see what the point about it not looking good is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 i remain optimistic until the movie or horrible reviews prove otherwise - the first two movies were amazing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 yea i don't care what's being said i loved the first two and i have a feeling i'm gonna love the third one as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 I've been reading some stuff on X3 and I'm more worried that there are too many characters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Signals1982 Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 I wish Bryan Singer was still doing these films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 QUOTE (Signals1982 @ Aug 29 2005, 07:20 PM) I wish Bryan Singer was still doing these films. Absolutely. I have little confidence in Brett Ratner. His two "Rush Hour" films and "Red Dragon" were uninspiring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro2112 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 My interpretation of the last line of the article was that the movie sucks so badly, that they are trying to rewrite the script. Yet the pressure for them to put out the movie was so great, they went ahead and started filming without a script. In other words, the movie will stink to high heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Aug 29 2005, 06:42 PM) QUOTE (Signals1982 @ Aug 29 2005, 07:20 PM) I wish Bryan Singer was still doing these films. Absolutely. I have little confidence in Brett Ratner. His two "Rush Hour" films and "Red Dragon" were uninspiring. are you kidding? the rush hours are like two of my fav movies! especially the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bastille Night Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 (edited) QUOTE (pedro2112 @ Aug 29 2005, 08:20 PM) My interpretation of the last line of the article was that the movie sucks so badly, that they are trying to rewrite the script. Yet the pressure for them to put out the movie was so great, they went ahead and started filming without a script. In other words, the movie will stink to high heaven. One of the articles that I read suggested that one of the head studio execs is fast-tracking the X3 movie so that it will be competing head-to-head against Singer's Superman flick......some sort of pissing match because Singer jumped ship. I'll bet my family fortune that Singer's movie slaughters the X3 movie which sounds like a trainwreck waiting to happen (although I should point out that my family fortune consists mainly of debt). Edited August 30, 2005 by Bastille Night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandalorian Hunter Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 I've said it once, and i'll say it again, BRING BACK GAMBIT!!!! Then the movie will be a hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 05:18 AM)I've said it once, and i'll say it again, BRING BACK GAMBIT!!!! Then the movie will be a hit. For him to be "BACK" would mean that he had been "IN" before . Although he was kinda 'in' in X2. Anyone catch it? Besides, the other X movies were hits without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 yea i was really hoping they were gonna put gambit in the third one. sounds like they're not, though, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geddy alex peart Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 critics are f***ing dumb asses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandalorian Hunter Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Sep 1 2005, 08:24 PM) QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 05:18 AM)I've said it once, and i'll say it again, BRING BACK GAMBIT!!!! Then the movie will be a hit. For him to be "BACK" would mean that he had been "IN" before . Although he was kinda 'in' in X2. Anyone catch it? Besides, the other X movies were hits without him. He was in the TV series, wasn't he??? Therefore, he can be brought back!!!!! Honestly, he really was the coolest of all of them (Come on, razor sharp playing cards!!!!) and the other two would have been bigger hits had Gambit been in there. No wonder they call the movies 'X' instead of X-men, they can't call it that without Gambit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclops Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 (edited) QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 06:32 AM) QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Sep 1 2005, 08:24 PM) QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 05:18 AM)I've said it once, and i'll say it again, BRING BACK GAMBIT!!!! Then the movie will be a hit. For him to be "BACK" would mean that he had been "IN" before . Although he was kinda 'in' in X2. Anyone catch it? Besides, the other X movies were hits without him. He was in the TV series, wasn't he??? Therefore, he can be brought back!!!!! Honestly, he really was the coolest of all of them (Come on, razor sharp playing cards!!!!) and the other two would have been bigger hits had Gambit been in there. No wonder they call the movies 'X' instead of X-men, they can't call it that without Gambit! Ok, they're not razor sharp playing cards. They are regualr playing cards he charges with kinetic energy and flings at whoever is pissing him off. As for X-3, everyone was dumping on X-2 because the script was supposed to suck. We all know how X-2 went, so why not put aside all the BS until the movie is made. And then we can tear is to shreds. I have one simple request for the makers of X-3: No more new X-men. You have more than enough characters to work with to make the movie interesting. In fact, if the writers are smart they'll be bold and push Wolverine, whose conflicts have been resolved, to the background and focus more on the others. Edited September 3, 2005 by Cyclops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 QUOTE (Cyclops @ Sep 3 2005, 09:43 AM)QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 06:32 AM) QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Sep 1 2005, 08:24 PM) QUOTE (Mandalorian Hunter @ Sep 2 2005, 05:18 AM)I've said it once, and i'll say it again, BRING BACK GAMBIT!!!! Then the movie will be a hit. For him to be "BACK" would mean that he had been "IN" before . Although he was kinda 'in' in X2. Anyone catch it? Besides, the other X movies were hits without him. He was in the TV series, wasn't he??? Therefore, he can be brought back!!!!! Honestly, he really was the coolest of all of them (Come on, razor sharp playing cards!!!!) and the other two would have been bigger hits had Gambit been in there. No wonder they call the movies 'X' instead of X-men, they can't call it that without Gambit! Ok, they're not razor sharp playing cards. They are regualr playing cards he charges with kinetic energy and flings at whoever is pissing him off. As for X-3, everyone was dumping on X-2 because the script was supposed to suck. We all know how X-2 went, so why not put aside all the BS until the movie is made. And then we can tear is to shreds. I have one simple request for the makers of X-3: No more new X-men. You have more than enough characters to work with to make the movie interesting. In fact, if the writers are smart they'll be bold and push Wolverine, whose conflicts have been resolved, to the background and focus more on the others. I totally agree with 'ya. However, from what I read, it looks like there are gonna be tons of new mutants. If they were smart, they'd focus (and should've focused) A LOT more on Cyclops' character. Wolverine may be X-Men's poster boy but Cyclops is THE original X-man. But even with minimal focus on him I still liked the X movies...especially X2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 i don't like cyclops though.....he's just not that interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusicFreak_08 Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 Yeah, I agree with you there. Gambit is the best X-Man by far. He's so cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 yes Gambit is awesome. but i think BEST is between good ol' Wolverine and Nightcrawler. Nightcrawler owns! the best part of X-2 was easily the beginning, i'm hoping NC gets more kick@$$ action like that in the third one. and of course Wolverine's stuff is always great too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now