Jump to content

Was Rush ever heavy metal?


rftag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Without getting into the downfalls and negative side to labeling music, let's toss this out there:

 

Heavy metal, esp in the late 1970s and early 1980s, represented more than just music - it was a form of music that represented an attitude, a way of life, and an outlet for kids and young adults who had confusion, anger, disenchantment or just plain testosterone built up inside .. It was also the music for those kids if they played guitar, bass or drums ..

 

The "metalheads" - as I remember them - were the guys with the painted denim jackets, the guy with the primered Duster who repaired it himself, and the introverted kid who wanted to explode in school because the other 12 year olds liked James Taylor and Billy Joel ....

 

RUSH appealed to all of the above back then

 

.

 

.

Edited by Lucas
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without getting into the downfalls and negative side to labeling music, let's toss this out there:

 

Heavy metal, esp in the late 1970s and early 1980s, represented more than just music - it was a form of music that represented an attitude, a way of life, and an outlet for kids and young adults who had confusion, anger, disenchantment or just plain testosterone built up inside .. It was also the music for those kids if they played guitar, bass or drums ..

 

The "metalheads" - as I remember them - were the guys with the painted denim jackets, the guy with the primered Duster who repaired it himself, and the introverted kid who wanted to explode in school because the other 12 year olds liked James Taylor and Billy Joel ....

 

RUSH appealed to all of the above back then

 

.

 

.

Fair point. We made our own jackets. Even made our own studded wristbands/gloves with nails and rivets. I definitely drove a 73 duster and played in bands. If you saw someone with a band shirt they were basically an instant friend. Found my bass player because I stopped him and talked about his shirt back in high school.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Up to Hemispheres, I'd label them as heavy progressive rock. Fine line perhaps between what Rush was doing and what people think of as "heavy metal". Deep Purple is the same. Both of them influenced many heavy metal bands that came later and you could perhaps argue that they were heavy metal relative *to their time*.

 

But like Lucas mentioned above, I think of true metal as coming more from a place of anger. Sabbath were metal because they were pissed off about having grown up in a dreary dead-end place and also because other bands then were only singing about love and rainbows, not about the darker side of reality. And you could feel that anger in their music, which made it more powerful.

 

The members of Rush weren't really angry guys, they just liked to jam. And when Neil came on board, they found a niche in literate philosophical hard rock.

 

OK, maybe 2112 was a product of them being pissed off after being pushed to conform, so I'd say that's the closest they ever came to being metal. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always considered Rush a quintesencial PUNK band really....Why? Because from the start, they were always saying "F it....we are doing what we want". When going from the first album to Fly By Night...they told the rec execs to F off and wrote longer songs with less "freindly" hooks....Caress Of Steel? Total F you to what was being expected, and demanded....same with 2112

 

To me everythign about them was punk...more punk than the corporate drones of the time like The Ramones or The Sex Pistols....

 

think of the (often dreaded) "Synth Era".... they wanted to go tha troute...everybody else told them that the yshouldn't...and they did anyway...lost tons of "fans", gained and/or kept true followers

 

they are the Anti-rockstars....when they totally deserve the designation as ULTIMATE rock stars. Not exploiting and abusing "The Limelight"....staying out of the public eye and only lending their time and names to things that the ydeemed important.

 

I HATED it when they got nominated to the Rock and Roll HOF....I was always proud that they were not lumped in with all of that mainstream corporate idiocy...

 

their music definitely crosses some genre boundries, but the yhave always been punk rockers underneath...I got into them in the late 70's when they were in the category of groups like Styx, Kansas, Yes....hard/progressive rock. I was...well, still am, an 80's metal head at heart, and Rush always fit into my listening pallette along side Maiden, Slayer, Mercyful Fate, Queensryche, Fates Warning, Minor Threat, Exodus, Suicidal Tendencies, Circle Jerks....they all had the same attitude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always considered Rush a quintesencial PUNK band really....Why? Because from the start, they were always saying "F it....we are doing what we want". When going from the first album to Fly By Night...they told the rec execs to F off and wrote longer songs with less "freindly" hooks....Caress Of Steel? Total F you to what was being expected, and demanded....same with 2112

 

To me everythign about them was punk...more punk than the corporate drones of the time like The Ramones or The Sex Pistols....

 

think of the (often dreaded) "Synth Era".... they wanted to go tha troute...everybody else told them that the yshouldn't...and they did anyway...lost tons of "fans", gained and/or kept true followers

 

they are the Anti-rockstars....when they totally deserve the designation as ULTIMATE rock stars. Not exploiting and abusing "The Limelight"....staying out of the public eye and only lending their time and names to things that the ydeemed important.

 

I HATED it when they got nominated to the Rock and Roll HOF....I was always proud that they were not lumped in with all of that mainstream corporate idiocy...

 

their music definitely crosses some genre boundries, but the yhave always been punk rockers underneath...I got into them in the late 70's when they were in the category of groups like Styx, Kansas, Yes....hard/progressive rock. I was...well, still am, an 80's metal head at heart, and Rush always fit into my listening pallette along side Maiden, Slayer, Mercyful Fate, Queensryche, Fates Warning, Minor Threat, Exodus, Suicidal Tendencies, Circle Jerks....they all had the same attitude

 

Is this why Neil pathetically ripped-off "Jet Boy Jet Girl" ??

 

ok, I understand where you are coming from, but I disagree with you on RUSH's sincerity during the 80s ... They disregarded a lifetime of living and influences and in a matter of months were put into haircuts, clothes, and god awful videos to fit into a comfortable, non-threatening niche - and to sell albums

Edited by Lucas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broading in the tower,

Watching o'er his land...

 

I can hear Metallica

 

BROODING IN THE TOW-AAAH!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did mean more in spirit and attitude than actual sound. In my wolrd from a sound stand point, they were blues rock (Rush) -> prog-hard rock (Fly By Night - Permanent Waves) -> hard rock (Moving Pictures - Signals) -> new wave (GUP - Roll The Bones) -> hard rock (Presto - Counterparts) -> rock (Test For Echo Snakes and Arrows) and I thought that CA was the closest they have been to hard rock since Moving Pictures minus the over-compressed production

 

They are definitely closer to metal than, say Kansas was in the 70's, but no where near Black Sabbath or Motorhead in that description for the era. I feel like MP was the closest they came to having a metal sound at the time that other strictky metal badns were around..ie Maiden, Ozzy, Sabbath with Dio. I think the biggest thing that kept them out of the metal bin for realz was the lack of the "chugga-chugga", muted E or A string driving rhythmic sound that was common with Maiden, Priest etc. Lifeson is definitely an "open chord" kind of guy. to me the song Driven and Stick It Out were the 2 songs closest to metal

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Punk?

 

LOL.

 

That's a good one.

 

he means in spirit, not in sound.

 

 

 

LOL

 

Even in spirit....uh, no. LOL.

 

you put on a rush record and most people will wanna leave the room. sounds like punk rock to me :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Punk?

 

LOL.

 

That's a good one.

 

he means in spirit, not in sound.

 

 

 

LOL

 

Even in spirit....uh, no. LOL.

 

you put on a rush record and most people will wanna leave the room. sounds like punk rock to me :D

 

By that measure, you could say Rush is also disco, death metal, polka, dixie, EDM, and country for that matter.

 

Nope, Rush is definitely not punk.

 

Sheesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe after Rush officially retires...the industry will adopt a new genre called Head Rush Rock.... For all the bands the don't fit neatly into Heavy Metal, Hard Rock, Classic Rock, Progressive Rock, Arena Rock, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Punk?

 

LOL.

 

That's a good one.

 

he means in spirit, not in sound.

 

 

 

LOL

 

Even in spirit....uh, no. LOL.

 

Rush are perfectionists. Punk is all about just going for it and " making some noise"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Punk?

 

LOL.

 

That's a good one.

 

he means in spirit, not in sound.

 

 

 

LOL

 

Even in spirit....uh, no. LOL.

 

Rush are perfectionists. Punk is all about just going for it and " making some noise"

 

They're about as opposite from punk as you can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...