treeman Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 i did not watch the superbowl. i do not watch TV. i do not like the stones. never had , never will. only a few songs have been catchy radio tunes, but would never spend my money on them. anyone who has to do the superbowl and all that crap on TV is selling out anyway it's all B.S. but to each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endlesslymocking Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 Two weeks late to the debat here comes my two cents. Parents are sick of this Hip-Hop culture....and after the Janet Jackson incident no one wants J-Lo, 50 Cent or Beyonce. There are some good new rock bands today but no one is truly GREAT. The Killers would have been the best choice if the makers of the super bowl actually cared. I think what they were thinking about is the new "revival" of classic rock in today's teens. But this "revival" is mostly Led Zeppelin, The doors, Pink Floyd and Jimi Hendrix. Bonham, Morrison and Hendrix are dead and Pink FLoyd isn't gonna reunite for some silly football game. The Rolling Stones actually had the highest grossing concert run of 2005. Close second was U2. I think that U2 should have played the super bowl...but not "vertigo." Let Bono go out there with his message and save some souls. Setlist being "Beautiful Day", "Stuck in a moment," and "peace and love, or else" My dad said as we shaking our heads at the Stones "Maybe they asked Bono to do it. He probably said 'Ok if you donate all proceeds to Africa'" that would have been brilliant Corporate America... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppetKing2112 Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 QUOTE (endlesslymocking @ Feb 20 2006, 01:05 PM) Two weeks late to the debat here comes my two cents. Parents are sick of this Hip-Hop culture....and after the Janet Jackson incident no one wants J-Lo, 50 Cent or Beyonce. There are some good new rock bands today but no one is truly GREAT. The Killers would have been the best choice if the makers of the super bowl actually cared. I think what they were thinking about is the new "revival" of classic rock in today's teens. But this "revival" is mostly Led Zeppelin, The doors, Pink Floyd and Jimi Hendrix. Bonham, Morrison and Hendrix are dead and Pink FLoyd isn't gonna reunite for some silly football game. The Rolling Stones actually had the highest grossing concert run of 2005. Close second was U2. I think that U2 should have played the super bowl...but not "vertigo." Let Bono go out there with his message and save some souls. Setlist being "Beautiful Day", "Stuck in a moment," and "peace and love, or else" My dad said as we shaking our heads at the Stones "Maybe they asked Bono to do it. He probably said 'Ok if you donate all proceeds to Africa'" that would have been brilliant Corporate America... I'll take this subpar Stones performance over U2 8 days a week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloserToTheHEART Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 I thought they were good. The sound quality was pretty bad though. It kind of sounded like Mick was winded. I liked the performance but then again, I like the Stones. I thought they could have done better but I think they did well for their age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112-Rob-2112 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. At the superbowl party I was at everybody was loving them. I never really heard the stones and I didnt really get to hear them that night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppetKing2112 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 12:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. At the superbowl party I was at everybody was loving them. I never really heard the stones and I didnt really get to hear them that night. They really are a great band...do not judge them by their bad performance on the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted February 21, 2006 Author Share Posted February 21, 2006 QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 12:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. At the superbowl party I was at everybody was loving them. I never really heard the stones and I didnt really get to hear them that night. They really are a great band...do not judge them by their bad performance on the superbowl. no, i agree they are a great band circa 1964-1972 who stumbled through 1981 with some occasional good songs before they really had no more value other than sentimental. a great band that should have quit years ago while they were ahead, but if they still like playing and people still like watching them, far be it from me to get in the way of the endless stream of medicority that is the music scene of the last 25 years... remember people - my OPINION only - please don't massacre me for it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppetKing2112 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Feb 21 2006, 10:58 AM) QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 12:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. At the superbowl party I was at everybody was loving them. I never really heard the stones and I didnt really get to hear them that night. They really are a great band...do not judge them by their bad performance on the superbowl. no, i agree they are a great band circa 1964-1972 who stumbled through 1981 with some occasional good songs before they really had no more value other than sentimental. a great band that should have quit years ago while they were ahead, but if they still like playing and people still like watching them, far be it from me to get in the way of the endless stream of medicority that is the music scene of the last 25 years... remember people - my OPINION only - please don't massacre me for it... Check out their new album...I would say it's as good as anything they did in the 70s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloserToTheHEART Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 03:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. I noticed that! It drove me insane! I figured it was his style but on every song? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thestand Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 02:17 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Feb 21 2006, 10:58 AM) QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 12:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. At the superbowl party I was at everybody was loving them. I never really heard the stones and I didnt really get to hear them that night. They really are a great band...do not judge them by their bad performance on the superbowl. no, i agree they are a great band circa 1964-1972 who stumbled through 1981 with some occasional good songs before they really had no more value other than sentimental. a great band that should have quit years ago while they were ahead, but if they still like playing and people still like watching them, far be it from me to get in the way of the endless stream of medicority that is the music scene of the last 25 years... remember people - my OPINION only - please don't massacre me for it... Check out their new album...I would say it's as good as anything they did in the 70s. I would have to agree with that. It is a great album. Now we just have to forget the '80's (I know I already have... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 QUOTE (CloserToTheHEART @ Feb 22 2006, 08:20 PM)QUOTE (2112-Rob-2112 @ Feb 21 2006, 03:36 AM) If you noticed whenever the drummer hit the snare...he stopped hitting the hi hat...he would hit them both at the same time...wierd. I noticed that! It drove me insane! I figured it was his style but on every song? Charlie Watts has ALWAYS played like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Test4VitalSigns Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a321/hemispheres2005/nextone2/Stones.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softfilter Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Actually they didn't seem that bad to me can't see how anybody can be to critical with the over hype cheesy glitz that is known as the SUPER BOWL. Thought that Aerosmith performance a few years ago was way worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Test4VitalSigns Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 I'm a great fan of the late 60's early 70's Stones but now they are all about the mighty buck...they still occasionally come out with the odd good song (Bigger Bang is actually pretty good) but for th most part they should hang it up....I was more pissed at the censorship crap the network was pulling Besides I don't bother with halftime shows regardless of who they are...(unless maybe is doing it but we all know that'll never happen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I did a search for The Rolling Stones and this thread came up: Keith Richards Hospitalized in New Zealand QUOTE WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards suffered a mild concussion while vacationing in Fiji and was flown to a New Zealand hospital for treatment, a band spokeswoman said Saturday. Media reports said Richards fell out of a palm tree and remained hospitalized in Auckland. Richards, 62, suffered a mild concussion while on holiday in Fiji earlier this week and was flown to New Zealand, band spokeswoman Fran Curtis said in a statement. "Following treatment locally and as a precautionary measure, he flew to a hospital accompanied by his wife, Patti, for observation," Curtis said. The statement did not elaborate on Richards' condition. But media reports in Australian and New Zealand said Richards hurt his head after falling out of a palm tree at an exclusive Fiji resort and remained hospitalized in Auckland. hosted.ap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush! Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 29 2006, 08:46 AM) I did a search for The Rolling Stones and this thread came up: Keith Richards Hospitalized in New Zealand QUOTE WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards suffered a mild concussion while vacationing in Fiji and was flown to a New Zealand hospital for treatment, a band spokeswoman said Saturday. Media reports said Richards fell out of a palm tree and remained hospitalized in Auckland. Richards, 62, suffered a mild concussion while on holiday in Fiji earlier this week and was flown to New Zealand, band spokeswoman Fran Curtis said in a statement. "Following treatment locally and as a precautionary measure, he flew to a hospital accompanied by his wife, Patti, for observation," Curtis said. The statement did not elaborate on Richards' condition. But media reports in Australian and New Zealand said Richards hurt his head after falling out of a palm tree at an exclusive Fiji resort and remained hospitalized in Auckland. hosted.ap.org Wow, he fell out of a palm tree. Maybe he was drunk/stoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppetKing2112 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 QUOTE (Rush! @ Apr 29 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 29 2006, 08:46 AM) I did a search for The Rolling Stones and this thread came up: Keith Richards Hospitalized in New Zealand QUOTE WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards suffered a mild concussion while vacationing in Fiji and was flown to a New Zealand hospital for treatment, a band spokeswoman said Saturday. Media reports said Richards fell out of a palm tree and remained hospitalized in Auckland. Richards, 62, suffered a mild concussion while on holiday in Fiji earlier this week and was flown to New Zealand, band spokeswoman Fran Curtis said in a statement. "Following treatment locally and as a precautionary measure, he flew to a hospital accompanied by his wife, Patti, for observation," Curtis said. The statement did not elaborate on Richards' condition. But media reports in Australian and New Zealand said Richards hurt his head after falling out of a palm tree at an exclusive Fiji resort and remained hospitalized in Auckland. hosted.ap.org Wow, he fell out of a palm tree. Maybe he was drunk/stoned. Probably. Keith will never die, though. That guy is invincible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Apr 29 2006, 05:07 PM) QUOTE (Rush! @ Apr 29 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 29 2006, 08:46 AM) I did a search for The Rolling Stones and this thread came up: Keith Richards Hospitalized in New Zealand QUOTE WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards suffered a mild concussion while vacationing in Fiji and was flown to a New Zealand hospital for treatment, a band spokeswoman said Saturday. Media reports said Richards fell out of a palm tree and remained hospitalized in Auckland. Richards, 62, suffered a mild concussion while on holiday in Fiji earlier this week and was flown to New Zealand, band spokeswoman Fran Curtis said in a statement. "Following treatment locally and as a precautionary measure, he flew to a hospital accompanied by his wife, Patti, for observation," Curtis said. The statement did not elaborate on Richards' condition. But media reports in Australian and New Zealand said Richards hurt his head after falling out of a palm tree at an exclusive Fiji resort and remained hospitalized in Auckland. hosted.ap.org Wow, he fell out of a palm tree. Maybe he was drunk/stoned. Probably. Keith will never die, though. That guy is invincible. Wow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 QUOTE (NeilPeartFan2112 @ Apr 29 2006, 01:17 PM)QUOTE (PuppetKing2112 @ Apr 29 2006, 05:07 PM) QUOTE (Rush! @ Apr 29 2006, 10:50 AM) QUOTE (Drumnut @ Apr 29 2006, 08:46 AM) I did a search for The Rolling Stones and this thread came up: Keith Richards Hospitalized in New Zealand QUOTE WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards suffered a mild concussion while vacationing in Fiji and was flown to a New Zealand hospital for treatment, a band spokeswoman said Saturday. Media reports said Richards fell out of a palm tree and remained hospitalized in Auckland. Richards, 62, suffered a mild concussion while on holiday in Fiji earlier this week and was flown to New Zealand, band spokeswoman Fran Curtis said in a statement. "Following treatment locally and as a precautionary measure, he flew to a hospital accompanied by his wife, Patti, for observation," Curtis said. The statement did not elaborate on Richards' condition. But media reports in Australian and New Zealand said Richards hurt his head after falling out of a palm tree at an exclusive Fiji resort and remained hospitalized in Auckland. hosted.ap.org Wow, he fell out of a palm tree. Maybe he was drunk/stoned. Probably. Keith will never die, though. That guy is invincible. Wow... If Keith only had one arm, I hear an old joke taking shape here: "How do you get a one armed, aging, rock star out of a tree?" Wave to him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drumnut Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnaWanna Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arleen2112 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 GET WELL SOON Keith http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e292/ar2112/keith2.jpg Keith is one Rockin' Guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnus Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/116142.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.