Jump to content

Geddy's voice sounds like fingernails over a chalkboard


Dread Pirate Robert
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't know what you're talking about. Personally, i find Geddy's 70s voice to be his absolute peak. I loved the raw wail his voice had to it, and the power behind some notes were incredible.

The climb in most early live versions of 2112 Overture is a great example of this.

His voice still sounded (and still sounds!) good, but it can't compare to his 70s voice, IMHO.

He really stopped going for the highs between 1980-1982. His raw wail also disappeared.

He still has great tone, and can go for the highs sometimes.

Edited by Eel Yddeg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's the voice I know and love right there!

 

That woke me up..! :LOL:

 

And people wonder why his voice has suffered over the years. :LOL:

 

What is he singing?

 

But I did notice yesterday when I was on an In The End kick that he stopped singing so high sometime during the MP tour.

 

He really had a beautiful singing voice back then. He could do a lot. I can't help but wonder if he ever listens to the old stuff and feels bad he can't sing like that anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's the voice I know and love right there!

 

That woke me up..! :LOL:

 

And people wonder why his voice has suffered over the years. :LOL:

 

What is he singing?

 

It's a compilation of his best screeches.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's the voice I know and love right there!

 

That woke me up..! :LOL:

 

And people wonder why his voice has suffered over the years. :LOL:

 

What is he singing?

 

But I did notice yesterday when I was on an In The End kick that he stopped singing so high sometime during the MP tour.

 

He really had a beautiful singing voice back then. He could do a lot. I can't help but wonder if he ever listens to the old stuff and feels bad he can't sing like that anymore.

It's just short bits and pieces of some of his "highest" works. Little 5 second or so clips all put together. It would have been cool if Fooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrr had ended it... :LOL: Edited by Narps
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be in the minority, but Geddy's voice has grown on me over the years and IMO he sounds better than ever.

No Geddy, no Rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've often wondered too how his throat felt after some of those shows in the seventies - whether it was a strain for him to sing like that, or if it came naturally.

 

He was obviously straining back in the day -- his voice doesn't lend itself to that growly screech without it being pushed -- and I think every time he did it he caused damage, but I doubt he knew that at the time or cared, if he did know.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be in the minority, but Geddy's voice has grown on me over the years and IMO he sounds better than ever.

No Geddy, no Rush.

You very much are I think... :)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've often wondered too how his throat felt after some of those shows in the seventies - whether it was a strain for him to sing like that, or if it came naturally.

 

He was obviously straining back in the day -- his voice doesn't lend itself to that growly screech without it being pushed -- and I think every time he did it he caused damage, but I doubt he knew that at the time or cared, if he did know.

Lousy for him but great for me. His voice was the first thing that drew me to the band. It drove many away but tough sh*t for them...
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

Edited by Lorraine
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

 

I don't get it either. His voice was one of the most appealing things about the band back in the day. Of course a lot of bands had high-pitched singers. It actually fits better in with the music then someone singing in a lower pitch. It carries better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've often wondered too how his throat felt after some of those shows in the seventies - whether it was a strain for him to sing like that, or if it came naturally.

 

I've always wondered this too. I would guess that he could easily sing high but the screaming part he had to focus on. That's just a guess though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

 

I wonder if it's just because he had such an unusual voice and people were thrown a bit by how high he could sing. I don't think many other singers sang quite like he did back then. So it probably sounded very strange in comparison to what was the norm at the time.

 

I agree, though, I always thought his voice was a plus, not a minus.

Edited by Xanadu
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

 

I wonder if it's just because he had such an unusual voice and people were thrown a bit by how high he could sing. I don't think many other singers sung quite like he did back then. So it probably sounded very strange in comparison to what was the norm at the time.

 

I agree, though, I always thought his voice was a plus, not a minus.

Yep. Different and unique usually worked for me...
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

 

I wonder if it's just because he had such an unusual voice and people were thrown a bit by how high he could sing. I don't think many other singers sang quite like he did back then. So it probably sounded very strange in comparison to what was the norm at the time.

 

I agree, though, I always thought his voice was a plus, not a minus.

 

There was nothing odd-sounding about his voice back then. We were used to Robert Plant screeching, so why would Geddy sound strange?

 

There was no "norm" back then either. Anything went.

Edited by Lorraine
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the lead singer in Yes. He sounds like a girl. If you want an odd voice, he had it.

I loved it but Bon Scott had a strange and different voice too. The band went downhill when he died in my view. The uniqueness was gone... Edited by Narps
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the lead singer in Yes. He sounds like a girl. If you want an odd voice, he had it.

I loved it but Bon Scott had a strange and different voice too. The band went downhill when he died in my view. The uniqueness was gone...

 

Yes, I loved his voice too, but I brought him up as another example to show that singing in a high pitch wasn't unique back then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my husband made a remark about his voice last night. I don't understand what the problem some have with that seventies voice. it never struck me back then, or now, as unusual sounding at all. :huh:

 

The more I listen to the old albums and bootlegs, the more I appreciate (and pick up on) what he was able to do with his voice.

 

I wonder if it's just because he had such an unusual voice and people were thrown a bit by how high he could sing. I don't think many other singers sang quite like he did back then. So it probably sounded very strange in comparison to what was the norm at the time.

 

I agree, though, I always thought his voice was a plus, not a minus.

 

There was nothing odd-sounding about his voice back then. We were used to Robert Plant screeching, so why would Geddy sound strange?

 

There was no "norm" back then either. Anything went.

 

I agree that the diversity back then was great - really inspiring

 

Geddy, Rob Halford, Freddie Mercury, Paul Stanley, Robin Zander, Bon Scott - all these guys had great recognizable voices

 

Even in the lighter music there was diversity - even encouraged diversity ... The Bee Gees and Leo Sayer come to mind

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the lead singer in Yes. He sounds like a girl. If you want an odd voice, he had it.

I loved it but Bon Scott had a strange and different voice too. The band went downhill when he died in my view. The uniqueness was gone...

 

Yes, I loved his voice too, but I brought him up as another example to show that singing in a high pitch wasn't unique back then.

Singing in a high register was pretty typical back then, but no one sang quite as high as Geddy; more importantly, no one wailed like he did with that incredibly unique vibrato
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the lead singer in Yes. He sounds like a girl. If you want an odd voice, he had it.

I loved it but Bon Scott had a strange and different voice too. The band went downhill when he died in my view. The uniqueness was gone...

 

Narps, I didn't see this until just now

 

Completely agree

 

Phil Lynott had a unique singing style too - almost spoken .. He is really underrated as a vocalist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...