Geddy says "in the studio soon"

[EmotionDetector]

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 10 2009, 08:27 AM)

Still, from 1974-1987, they only made 4 tracks I didn't like.

Hey Goobs,

 

Just out of curiousity, what are the 4 tracks?

[EmotionDetector]

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 7 2009, 07:59 PM)

QUOTE (Spindrift82 @ Dec 7 2009, 05:44 PM) I don't get how people say Snakes & Arrows was a bad album. It's their most solid album since Hold Your Fire or Presto, that's since 1989! I know people say "don't diss Counterparts," but to me it was a weak album. Rush have had uneven albums since the early 90s, Snakes & Arrows was the first Rush album since then that wasn't uneven, and had a great flow. If they put out an album just as good as S&A, I will be a very happy Rush fan!  Actually I think their only quality albums since HYF have been CP & S&A - the others have been sporadic at best... Yup...definitely the two best since HYF. That's for sure.

[rushgoober]

QUOTE (EmotionDetector @ Dec 10 2009, 06:50 AM)

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 10 2009, 08:27 AM) Still, from 1974-1987, they only made 4 tracks I didn't like. Hey Goobs,   Just out of curiousity, what are the 4 tracks? I Think I'm Going Bald, The Necromancer (narration kills it for me), Tai Shan and High Water.

[Del_Duio]

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 10 2009, 09:03 AM)

QUOTE (EmotionDetector @ Dec 10 2009, 06:50 AM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 10 2009, 08:27 AM) Still, from 1974-1987, they only made 4 tracks I didn't like. Hey Goobs,   Just out of curiousity, what are the 4 tracks? I Think I'm Going Bald, The Necromancer (narration kills it for me), Tai Shan and High Water. Dude I totally called the Tai Shan / High Water combo!

[PariahDog]

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 9 2009, 11:51 PM)

You'd actually rather them have cheap filler than shorter quality albums?

Absolutely, I would rather have these songs than not have them!

 

I think many fans have personal favorites among these "filler" songs. Many here would consider Everyday Glory to be filler, but I think it's one of the best on CP. I also think Color of Right is a sleeper track on TFE.

 

I do agree that ONE song should probably not have been released: Dog Years. They should have recycled that first heavy guitar riff into some other track.

 

But I'm glad that Rush is making these decisions and not TRF members.

 

 

 

[metaldad]

QUOTE (PariahDog @ Dec 10 2009, 01:38 PM)

I'm glad that Rush is making these decisions and not TRF members.

Yeah, because Rush would listen to what we have to say . Would be nice if they listened but.............

[rushgoober]

QUOTE (PariahDog @ Dec 10 2009, 11:38 AM)

QUOTE (rushgoober @ Dec 9 2009, 11:51 PM) You'd actually rather them have cheap filler than shorter quality albums? Absolutely, I would rather have these songs than not have them!   I think many fans have personal favorites among these "filler" songs. Many here would consider Everyday Glory to be filler, but I think it's one of the best on CP. I also think Color of Right is a sleeper track on TFE.   I do agree that ONE song should probably not have been released: Dog Years. They should have recycled that first heavy guitar riff into some other track.   But I'm glad that Rush is making these decisions and not TRF members. What I was saying before is if they just make higher quality material less people will complain, but of course it's very subjective always. You really don't hear a lot of people saying Moving Pictures or Permanent Waves is substandard or filled with filler though. I personally would rather they didn't release a LOT of songs of theirs. Anyway, we'll agree to disagree.