Jump to content

Lord of The Flies


Recommended Posts

Hi! So has anyone here read Lord Of The Flies? I have a question about the symbolism of pigs. My question is: What is the symbolism of pigs? I'm usually good with this kinda thing but I'm stuck here. I have a project to do on it in English and it's such a vast topic, how can I give pigs just one theme? So far I've considered religion, obsession, superstition, omens, temptation, sex and death, but what do you guys think? Thanks ^_^
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read it a few years ago and I thought the pigs represented innocence. Jack, who was obsessed with killing and hunting represented evil and guilt while the pig was like a victim. I'm probably way off but that's how I saw it. Good luck!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been 25 years since I read this fun book. I thought of the pig as: the loss of innocence itself...the desire to hunt the pig, and the actual appearance of the pig's head deteriorating/changing. I vaguely remember one of the characters leaning into and putting all his weight into the pig as it's being slain (is this right or am I too old?). That in itself could be thought of as sexual. Who knows? I might have to read that again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ May 23 2011, 05:02 AM)
It's been 25 years since I read this fun book. I thought of the pig as: the loss of innocence itself...the desire to hunt the pig, and the actual appearance of the pig's head deteriorating/changing. I vaguely remember one of the characters leaning into and putting all his weight into the pig as it's being slain (is this right or am I too old?). That in itself could be thought of as sexual. Who knows? I might have to read that again.

THANK YOU!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pig is not necessarily symbolic of anything until they decapitate one and offer it as a gift for the beast...which the reader knows does not physically exist. The beast is actually themselves as suggested early on by Simon. The pig's head on the stick is actually the "Lord of the Flies" which talks to Simon and tells him the problem. Lord of the Flies is a euphemism for Beelzebub, one of the seven princes of Hell. As suggested earlier, the pigs do lead to the loss of innocence as they are a harmless creature that offers them something when dead. Killing them satisfies Jack's blood lust which then leads to Roger and Maurice's move later in the story. Hope this helps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (micgtr71 @ May 23 2011, 08:26 AM)
The pig is not necessarily symbolic of anything until they decapitate one and offer it as a gift for the beast...which the reader knows does not physically exist. The beast is actually themselves as suggested early on by Simon. The pig's head on the stick is actually the "Lord of the Flies" which talks to Simon and tells him the problem. Lord of the Flies is a euphemism for Beelzebub, one of the seven princes of Hell. As suggested earlier, the pigs do lead to the loss of innocence as they are a harmless creature that offers them something when dead. Killing them satisfies Jack's blood lust which then leads to Roger and Maurice's move later in the story. Hope this helps.

Thanks, my teacher seems to think that "pigs" in entirety is a symbol but I think it's absurdly broad. I mean, you have pigs that Jack hunts, the talking pig head, Piggy and The Sow all rolled into one topic there tongue.gif But thanks so much C:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Earthshine Emmeline @ May 23 2011, 09:16 PM)
QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ May 23 2011, 05:02 AM)
It's been 25 years since I read this fun book. I thought of the pig as: the loss of innocence itself...the desire to hunt the pig, and the actual appearance of the pig's head deteriorating/changing. I vaguely remember one of the characters leaning into and putting all his weight into the pig as it's being slain (is this right or am I too old?). That in itself could be thought of as sexual. Who knows? I might have to read that again.

THANK YOU!!!

No problem. Although, I wouldn't trust me too much wink.gif . If your teacher is decent you should be able to argue that it's symbolic of almost anything (if you have enough support to back it up of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just verifying that it's a loss of innocence (that's generally how it's perceived) and drive it home with the name "Piggy" and what Piggy actually stands for and the themes centered around Piggy as a character. And pronounce Ralph's name correctly! That drives me nuts. wink.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Earthshine Emmeline @ May 23 2011, 02:36 PM)
QUOTE (micgtr71 @ May 23 2011, 08:26 AM)
The pig is not necessarily symbolic of anything until they decapitate one and offer it as a gift for the beast...which the reader knows does not physically exist. The beast is actually themselves as suggested early on by Simon. The pig's head on the stick is actually the "Lord of the Flies" which talks to Simon and tells him the problem. Lord of the Flies is a euphemism for Beelzebub, one of the seven princes of Hell. As suggested earlier, the pigs do lead to the loss of innocence as they are a harmless creature that offers them something when dead. Killing them satisfies Jack's blood lust which then leads to Roger and Maurice's move later in the story. Hope this helps.

Thanks, my teacher seems to think that "pigs" in entirety is a symbol but I think it's absurdly broad. I mean, you have pigs that Jack hunts, the talking pig head, Piggy and The Sow all rolled into one topic there tongue.gif But thanks so much C:

I suppose that if one stretches it, the pig could be a symbol of the race of people that a 12 year old could dominate. As part of the fascism theme, the boys use the pig for power, Jack rise to power by exploiting them, and one of the pigs is sacrificed to appease the enemy (beast). When looked at this way, the pigs could be symbolic of the helpless masses. You could go in that route and see what your teacher thinks. Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey buddy. It's not just the loss of innocence but the loss of innocence leading to greed, lethargy, and filth, among other things of course. Sex and death...doesn't sound very fun, but probably a fun way to go wink.gif

 

But seriously, regard only the first part of my post.

And try to analyze it with the whole story, not just by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (micgtr71 @ May 23 2011, 08:26 AM)
The pig is not necessarily symbolic of anything until they decapitate one and offer it as a gift for the beast...which the reader knows does not physically exist. The beast is actually themselves as suggested early on by Simon. The pig's head on the stick is actually the "Lord of the Flies" which talks to Simon and tells him the problem. Lord of the Flies is a euphemism for Beelzebub, one of the seven princes of Hell. As suggested earlier, the pigs do lead to the loss of innocence as they are a harmless creature that offers them something when dead. Killing them satisfies Jack's blood lust which then leads to Roger and Maurice's move later in the story. Hope this helps.

goodpost.gif This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes a pig is just a pig.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only realized that pigs were a recurring reference in Lord of the Flies once I read your post and then I looked it up on Shmoop. The pig hunts represent human tendencies towards violence, destruction, mob mentality, cruelty and subjugation of those perceived as weaker. Taking this a little further, we can see pigs as our innocence. The death of Piggy, Simon as well as the barbaric, horrifying, hideous massacre of the female pig show us that the pigs were no longer being killed for survival, but for the sake of violence, brutality and power--lust itself, and in doing so, the boys were killing their own innocence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (micgtr71 @ May 26 2011, 04:26 PM)
QUOTE (Earthshine Emmeline @ May 23 2011, 02:36 PM)
QUOTE (micgtr71 @ May 23 2011, 08:26 AM)
The pig is not necessarily symbolic of anything until they decapitate one and offer it as a gift for the beast...which the reader knows does not physically exist. The beast is actually themselves as suggested early on by Simon. The pig's head on the stick is actually the "Lord of the Flies" which talks to Simon and tells him the problem. Lord of the Flies is a euphemism for Beelzebub, one of the seven princes of Hell. As suggested earlier, the pigs do lead to the loss of innocence as they are a harmless creature that offers them something when dead. Killing them satisfies Jack's blood lust which then leads to Roger and Maurice's move later in the story. Hope this helps.

Thanks, my teacher seems to think that "pigs" in entirety is a symbol but I think it's absurdly broad. I mean, you have pigs that Jack hunts, the talking pig head, Piggy and The Sow all rolled into one topic there tongue.gif But thanks so much C:

I suppose that if one stretches it, the pig could be a symbol of the race of people that a 12 year old could dominate. As part of the fascism theme, the boys use the pig for power, Jack rise to power by exploiting them, and one of the pigs is sacrificed to appease the enemy (beast). When looked at this way, the pigs could be symbolic of the helpless masses. You could go in that route and see what your teacher thinks. Hope this helps.

The problem is my experience was high school and below was all about finding out what the accepted interpretations are and regurgitating while college allowed you to decide for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...