Jump to content

Fish solo vs non-Fish Marillion


YYZumbi
 Share

  

9 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you prefer the most?

    • Fish solo
    • non-Fish Marillion


Recommended Posts

This is easy for me. The new singer in "Marillion" is really bad, and they have changed their sound a lot since Fish left. Not the same band at all anymore.

 

And Fish have done some really good solo stuff as well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is easy for me. The new singer in "Marillion" is really bad, and they have changed their sound a lot since Fish left. Not the same band at all anymore.

 

And Fish have done some really good solo stuff as well!

 

There's nothing wrong with Steve Hogarth as a singer, but they need to write music that doesn't suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is easy for me. The new singer in "Marillion" is really bad, and they have changed their sound a lot since Fish left. Not the same band at all anymore.

 

And Fish have done some really good solo stuff as well!

 

There's nothing wrong with Steve Hogarth as a singer.

 

You kidding me? I saw him live a couple of years ago (when I just got into Marillion, I did not know it was a new singer), and it was terrible. Im telling you, he can´t sing for shit!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love them both. Funny thing is I thought it went south for both from about 1993 to 1995 with Brave, Afraid of Sunlight, Songs From The Mirror and Suits but they recovered nicely with This Strange Engine and Sunsets On Empire and it's been great since (save for maybe Field Of Crows by Fish.)

 

But other than that, can't get enough of both really, especially live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is easy for me. The new singer in "Marillion" is really bad, and they have changed their sound a lot since Fish left. Not the same band at all anymore.

 

And Fish have done some really good solo stuff as well!

 

There's nothing wrong with Steve Hogarth as a singer.

 

You kidding me? I saw him live a couple of years ago (when I just got into Marillion, I did not know it was a new singer), and it was terrible. Im telling you, he can´t sing for shit!

 

He sings like he's got a constant head cold. they really couldn't have found someone better. the thing is they do write good tunes on occasion. for me it's totally Hogarth. he sucks.

 

Mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is easy for me. The new singer in "Marillion" is really bad, and they have changed their sound a lot since Fish left. Not the same band at all anymore.

 

And Fish have done some really good solo stuff as well!

 

There's nothing wrong with Steve Hogarth as a singer.

 

You kidding me? I saw him live a couple of years ago (when I just got into Marillion, I did not know it was a new singer), and it was terrible. Im telling you, he can´t sing for shit!

 

He sings like he's got a constant head cold. they really couldn't have found someone better. the thing is they do write good tunes on occasion. for me it's totally Hogarth. he sucks.

 

Mick

 

Don't really have a problem with Hogarth unless he tries to sing Fish songs, anything from Brave and probably Cannibal Surf Babe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...