WCFIELDS

Not a huge fan of any of them, but I'll go with The Pass.....

Time in Motion - pretty good Driven - Decent Test For Echo - ok the rest, pretty much terrible....

QUOTE (DBJetsman @ Jul 6 2012, 06:19 PM) I'm only 16 and I think MP destroys CA. In fact, I think CA is MAYBE an above average Rush album. same here. MP and CA aren't even in the same league.....

Nope....somewhere in the top 5 though...

QUOTE (theanalogmiddleagedman @ Jul 6 2012, 09:20 AM) I've heard it on the Boneyard. I think that is the same as Octane. Different stations...

I listen to Octane everyday for abour 9 hours or so a day. I've heard HF twice ever on there.....

QUOTE (eshine @ Jul 3 2012, 09:11 PM) QUOTE (They Bow Defeated @ Jul 3 2012, 05:56 PM) QUOTE (eshine @ Jul 3 2012, 05:44 PM) Maybe people would stop bringing you up with regards to Geds voice if you didn't come off as so full of yourself and mean-spirited when criticizing him? I commend you for finally posting some clips of your own singing - but suffice to say you are not nearly as good as you think you are, and certainly no Geddy Lee. The man can sing circles around you. Sorry. Yeah, some ego. One 19 second YouTube video "proves" that he's as good as Geddy Lee in his prime? Or better? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eljJsLYbKjI QUOTE (trenken @ Jul 2 2012, 08:58 PM)I f**k up some notes in there from worn out vocals, but I can point you to some youtube vids of Geddy on the Hemispheres tour sounding far worse than what I recorded there if you like. It's never a good sign when a singer (or any musician) spends more time talking about technique and how good they are rather then just letting the craft speak for itself. I haven't much use for anyone with that big of an ego, regardless of how good they are, but if you talk the talk then at least back it up. Geddy Lee is a better singer at 58 then this dude could ever hope to be. Why on earth he would prop himself up like this is beyond me. Pretty big fail, sorry Trenken. He's hitting the notes.....like he said he could

QUOTE (Analog_Bro @ Jul 3 2012, 07:58 PM) QUOTE (bluefox4000 @ Jul 3 2012, 08:04 PM) QUOTE (GeminiRising79 @ Jul 3 2012, 07:54 PM) QUOTE (LeaveMyThingAlone @ Jul 3 2012, 04:37 PM) Rush has ALWAYS been a "been there, done that" kind of band Not anymore. They've "been there" for the last three albums. Pretty much this. At this point there's no creativity left in the tank.....no matter how much we want to believe it's there. Mick I completely disagree about there being no creativity left - I feel the opposite Yeah, there may be a LITTLE left....

None!

If they removed the vocals from all of the tracks and left the songs they way they were? They'd be worse, because the music wasn't written to be that way..

QUOTE (-D-RocK- @ Jul 2 2012, 12:23 PM) QUOTE (WCFIELDS @ Jun 30 2012, 09:16 AM) QUOTE (trenken @ Jun 30 2012, 06:20 AM) http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/22751345.jpg Masterpiece? Funny..... Care to define why it isn't a masterpiece? So far none of you negative nancys haven't done that. When I think of a "masterpiece" (and I don't classify many albums as such), I think of a perfect album of songs and top notch production. An overall FLAWLESS album. CA is not even close in any way, shape, or form. Sorry..

QUOTE (metaldad @ Jul 2 2012, 09:06 AM) QUOTE (GeminiRising79 @ Jul 2 2012, 09:56 AM) I'm confident that more than a few people on this board could do a significantly better job than the last three productions. It's unreal how many production issues they've had with their recent albums/live DVD's....

listened to the whole song a few times.....and not too pumped. I'll just listen to their old albums, as opposed to attempts to rehash it.

G

QUOTE (ReflectedLight @ Jul 1 2012, 07:35 PM) QUOTE (WCFIELDS @ Jul 1 2012, 08:10 PM) we don't need a string section. Record all the parts like they do with all the backup vocals/harmonies.... sure they don't need a string section but that's the way they are going so the best we can hope for is keeping the orchestra out of the main field of view. yes sir....agree...

I get a kick out of guys throwing shit at trenken.....he makes a lot of valid points and has strong opinions. Some of you take it personally?.....grow up already.

QUOTE (trenken @ Jul 1 2012, 07:24 PM) Dont agree. Although it's not very original or all that different from what bands like Foo Fighters are doing, to me it's one of the few songs with a catchy chorus melody, and Im a sucker for those so Im fine with it. I dont skip it. Come to think of it.....I hear Foo Fighters all over the verses...

The results would be far more accurate in about a years time...

we don't need a string section. Record all the parts like they do with all the backup vocals/harmonies....