treeduck Posted July 22, 2016 Author Share Posted July 22, 2016 In the midst of all this excitement, it is probably likely that he won't even see the link in the first place!So is this the video you're going to target? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgTOoRkP_Hs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucey Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 In the midst of all this excitement, it is probably likely that he won't even see the link in the first place!So is this the video you're going to target? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgTOoRkP_Hs If it's the latest one, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 22, 2016 Author Share Posted July 22, 2016 In the midst of all this excitement, it is probably likely that he won't even see the link in the first place!So is this the video you're going to target? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgTOoRkP_Hs If it's the latest one, yes.Appears to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 22, 2016 Author Share Posted July 22, 2016 I was surprised when he mentioned in the Signals review that he was 11 in 1982, so he was only a mere 41 in the video, I was thinking 55 at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugen Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I was surprised when he mentioned in the Signals review that he was 11 in 1982, so he was only a mere 41 in the video, I was thinking 55 at least. Probably that his cynical views fooled you on his age... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I better go listen to the Signals review..... :madra: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 22, 2016 Author Share Posted July 22, 2016 I was surprised when he mentioned in the Signals review that he was 11 in 1982, so he was only a mere 41 in the video, I was thinking 55 at least. Probably that his cynical views fooled you on his age...It's not his views it's his face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Digital Man is sub-par?? :o The Weapon - he felt he was being beaten over the head by a weapon??? :o :o Well, take this Darren. :smash: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canadianice Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 What a turd he is!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucey Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 There Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 There, what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucey Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 There, I've done the deed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Awkward fella2 hours ago Fame at last! A thread about you has been created on "The Rush Forum"... http://www.therushfo...-album-reviews/Reply Darren Lock2 hours ago Ooooh f**k... (too scared to look)Reply1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Reply1 Awkward fella10 minutes ago It's all in good fun...well, except one or two posts which are a tad rude!Reply That's not me is it? :o 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Reading these posts makes me think that I'm glad I didn't watch any of the vids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Reading these posts makes me think that I'm glad I didn't watch any of the vidsYou're not missing anything. I was just on one of those youtube treks and just stumbled on one and just ended up watching... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucey Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Reply1 Awkward fella10 minutes ago It's all in good fun...well, except one or two posts which are a tad rude!Reply That's not me is it? :o I'm not naming names! :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbine Freight Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Hope he comes on here & tells all the fanbois to f**k off !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Hope he comes on here & tells all the fanbois to f**k off !!Yeah but none of the real white knuckle fanboys have posted in this thread. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbine Freight Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Hope he comes on here & tells all the fanbois to f**k off !!Yeah but none of the real white knuckle fanboys have posted in this thread. Post #59 disproves this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Hope he comes on here & tells all the fanbois to f**k off !!Yeah but none of the real white knuckle fanboys have posted in this thread. Quite right, Treeduck. We're the objective crew. Wait until the TrueRushFans catch wind of these critiques of the #1 band's albums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I'll tell you what I'm wondering. I'm wondering why someone would feel the need to critique albums of a band they don't care for to begin with. You know you're not going to like the music anyway, so why bother? Am I missing something? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbine Freight Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I'll tell you what I'm wondering. I'm wondering why someone would feel the need to critique albums of a band they don't care for to begin with. You know you're not going to like the music anyway, so why bother? Am I missing something? Hey it's a free country. People on here shit all over stuff they already made their minds up about. I suppose some people have too much free time whether they like Rush or not. It may not make sense to you or I, but hey ho. That's the internet for you 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugen Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I'll tell you what I'm wondering. I'm wondering why someone would feel the need to critique albums of a band they don't care for to begin with. You know you're not going to like the music anyway, so why bother? Am I missing something? Darren is a special case (nutcase), the more he dislikes an album, the more in can go on a rampage to be funny and be completely subjective, listen to his review of Anderson/Stolt album. He can purchase an album just to have the vinyl the new edition. I suspect that he enjoy the art covers more than the music. As for his Rush's reviews, it's not totally negative, he can appreciate some songs, and he can enjoy some albums, but this not one of his favorite band, we all know. He is an entertainer critic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeduck Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Hope he comes on here & tells all the fanbois to f**k off !!Yeah but none of the real white knuckle fanboys have posted in this thread. Post #59 disproves this.That's just good humoured banter similar to Fridge calling him a TWOT or t**t or whatever it was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now