bathory Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 @savage: a lot of folks mean that it's 70s "in spirit." I believe ledrush was the first dude to say that months and months ago in another poll that was similar to this one, but he was just saying that because he hates most 80s music 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troutman Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It was purposefully released on Midnight January 1, 1980 so that it would be the first album released in the 80's. 70's. Yes, which means that it's "purposefully" a 1980's album. And release dates are usually intentional. Are you arguing against yourself in your own post? I personally don't give a sh**!!! I missed this tour so thats all that matters. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) @savage: a lot of folks mean that it's 70s "in spirit." I believe ledrush was the first dude to say that months and months ago in another poll that was similar to this one, but he was just saying that because he hates most 80s music I understand that but the question is : What decade does Permanent Waves REALLY belong in? It doesn't matter what it "feels" like. The objective answer is clear. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qXU72YvT0Ao/T22uSdSb_JI/AAAAAAAAAEM/jw--C9wXOv8/s1600/1980s.jpg Edited October 1, 2014 by savagegrace26 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narps Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It was purposefully released on Midnight January 1, 1980 so that it would be the first album released in the 80's. 70's. Yes, which means that it's "purposefully" a 1980's album. And release dates are usually intentional. Are you arguing against yourself in your own post? I personally don't give a sh**!!! I missed this tour so thats all that matters. :PI saw it.... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It was purposefully released on Midnight January 1, 1980 so that it would be the first album released in the 80's. 70's. Yes, which means that it's "purposefully" a 1980's album. And release dates are usually intentional. Are you arguing against yourself in your own post? I personally don't give a sh**!!! I missed this tour so thats all that matters. :PI saw it.... :) Did you see it in 1979 or 1980? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 Have we come to a decision here yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?/topic/89732-what-decade-does-permanent-waves-really-belong-in/#entry3299129 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushforum.com/index.php?/topic/89732-what-decade-does-permanent-waves-really-belong-in/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narps Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It was purposefully released on Midnight January 1, 1980 so that it would be the first album released in the 80's. 70's. Yes, which means that it's "purposefully" a 1980's album. And release dates are usually intentional. Are you arguing against yourself in your own post? I personally don't give a sh**!!! I missed this tour so thats all that matters. :PI saw it.... :) Did you see it in 1979 or 1980?Both... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. Eh, you have a good response there... :/ I don't know. Movies and music are different to me. It's dependent on when they are publicly released because they are being produced mainly for public consumption. Paintings are more personal... Eh. You have a good point :) The real question is when is the work conisdered "finished"? Usually it's not until actual release. I really like your response by the way :) :) :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. When in 1979 was it recorded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. When in 1979 was it recorded? It matters when it was mixed and mastered too which is part of the process. When the work was completely finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toymaker Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 The somewhat brighter production and shorter songs may make it seem like 80s Rush, but it doesn't have the cheeseball 80s synth sound. It feels 70sish to me, but I also think it's kind of a threshold thing - definitely looking back and looking forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Paintings are not usually mass produced right away so...it depends with that... There's just one painting and it's shown in galleries. Movies and music like this are usually released in large quantities to the general public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narps Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. When in 1979 was it recorded?I just know the Pre tour or whatever you call it that I saw was in August of 79. They only played TSOR and Freewill... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geddy's Soul Patch Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Definitely 70s, when it was created 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. When in 1979 was it recorded?I just know the Pre tour or whatever you call it that I saw was in August of 79. They only played TSOR and Freewill... And they weren't the final versions. Different solos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 The somewhat brighter production and shorter songs may make it seem like 80s Rush, but it doesn't have the cheeseball 80s synth sound. It feels 70sish to me, but I also think it's kind of a threshold thing - definitely looking back and looking forward. i think it is half and half. Some of the songs seem to not belong on that particular album. Jacob's Ladder should have been swapped with Closer To The Heart. It fits more on AFTK than CTTH does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 Savage, just admit Eagle is right and be done with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagegrace26 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 The somewhat brighter production and shorter songs may make it seem like 80s Rush, but it doesn't have the cheeseball 80s synth sound. It feels 70sish to me, but I also think it's kind of a threshold thing - definitely looking back and looking forward. i think it is half and half. Some of the songs seem to not belong on that particular album. Jacob's Ladder should have been swapped with Closer To The Heart. It fits more on AFTK than CTTH does. Eh. What a way to quickly knock Permanent Waves out of the #1 spot.....Closer to the Heart? No thanks... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. Eh, you have a good response there... :/ I don't know. Movies and music are different to me. It's dependent on when they are publicly released because they are being produced mainly for public consumption. Paintings are more personal... Eh. You have a good point :) The real question is when is the work conisdered "finished"? Usually it's not until actual release. I really like your response by the way :) :) :) Thanks. :-) I guess after being in the business for a lot of years I am aware of what belongs to the artist and what belongs to the public. Rushs music for example is their own property even though their distribution rights have been given to the record companies. So when they created it would have to be when it became a product. It was influenced by what came before, which would make it a product of the 70s. The 80s hadn't happened yet, so it can't be a product of that decade. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. When in 1979 was it recorded?I just know the Pre tour or whatever you call it that I saw was in August of 79. They only played TSOR and Freewill... So the entire album was probably recorded by then and finished? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narps Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'm not sure I understand the question. If it was created in the 70s, why wouldn't that make it a product of that decade? http://www.therushfo...n/#entry3299129 Yes and...? It doesn't really matter when the public heard it. What matters is when it was created. It's their music not ours. If an artist paints a painting in December of one year but doesn't put it up in a gallery until January of the next year that doesn't change the fact that it was created in the previous year. Eh, you have a good response there... :/ I don't know. Movies and music are different to me. It's dependent on when they are publicly released because they are being produced mainly for public consumption. Paintings are more personal... Eh. You have a good point :) The real question is when is the work conisdered "finished"? Usually it's not until actual release. I really like your response by the way :) :) :) Thanks. :-) I guess after being in the business for a lot of years I am aware of what belongs to the artist and what belongs to the public. Rushs music for example is their own property even though their distribution rights have been given to the record companies. So when they created it would have to be when it became a product. It was influenced by what came before, which would make it a product of the 70s. The 80s hadn't happened yet, so it can't be a product of that decade. :goodone: Deep.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toymaker Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 The somewhat brighter production and shorter songs may make it seem like 80s Rush, but it doesn't have the cheeseball 80s synth sound. It feels 70sish to me, but I also think it's kind of a threshold thing - definitely looking back and looking forward. i think it is half and half. Some of the songs seem to not belong on that particular album. Jacob's Ladder should have been swapped with Closer To The Heart. It fits more on AFTK than CTTH does. Interesting . . . as I recall, you're not a fan of Closer to the Heart. I think you're right that there's something about the atmosphere of Jacob's Ladder that allows it to snuggle in with Xanadu, maybe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now