Jump to content


Philadelphia Sports Parody Blog Calls Band "Ugly"


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 ThatLightInYourEyes

ThatLightInYourEyes

    Rushaholic

  • Members
  • 1596 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:"Underwater by the end of this century!" rave the climatologists.
  • Interests:Trying. Just trying.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 02:10 PM

I was just searching for band pics and found a picture with "Ugly Canadian Band Rush" underneath. Here's the unfunny article:

http://phalsephillys...ia-this-season/

Not as bad as having to scroll through a ton of airbrushed Big Time Rush pics in Google Images (Bastards. :rage:) but still pretty lame.

Sponsored Post

#2 Cyclonus X-1

Cyclonus X-1

    Yurts >>>>>>> Gers

  • Members *
  • 61409 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota
  • Interests:Music, literature, sports.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 02:17 PM

Unfunny is right.  What a lame site.

#3 KennyLee

KennyLee

    Always A Bridesmaid

  • Members
  • 2937 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Delaware
  • Interests:Rush, hockey, Rush and hockey.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 02:21 PM

Really lame.  :bitchslap:

#4 ThatLightInYourEyes

ThatLightInYourEyes

    Rushaholic

  • Members
  • 1596 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:"Underwater by the end of this century!" rave the climatologists.
  • Interests:Trying. Just trying.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 02:33 PM

Yeah, I'm not offended, personally. Sports bloggers are always writing trash about everybody. Just got bored enough to share this is all. :huh:

Edited by ThatLightInYourEyes, 15 October 2014 - 02:34 PM.


#5 EagleMoon

EagleMoon

    Beauty and the Bass

  • Members
  • 21763 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Interests:GUI and graphic design, writing, reading, hiking with my dog and photography.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 05:18 PM

Typical crap.

#6 ThatLightInYourEyes

ThatLightInYourEyes

    Rushaholic

  • Members
  • 1596 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:"Underwater by the end of this century!" rave the climatologists.
  • Interests:Trying. Just trying.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 07:52 PM

Since the usual "eyeroll" smiley isn't enough, I'll use these eyerolls:

Posted Image

#7 laughedatbytime

laughedatbytime

    Twin City Cub Fan

  • Members *
  • 69627 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:suburban Minneapolis
  • Interests:women's Uggs, trying to compensate for my small hands, buying gifts for the equipment staff, smashing certain cell phones, that dreamy Judge Berman

Posted 15 October 2014 - 08:53 PM

This stuff couldn't even make Andy Borowitz's blog.

#8 Mara

Mara

    Hindu Goddess of Death

  • Members *
  • 25526 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Marietta, Georgia, USA
  • Interests:Reading (historical fiction, Cold War political intrigue esp). Playing with my dogs, hiking, working out like a maniac. Thoroughbred racing.

Posted 15 October 2014 - 11:00 PM

I suppose the writers of that blog are unfamiliar with the Rolling Stones.  Lucky for them they had talent, because they are hands down the ugliest band ever to share a stage with musical instruments.  The members of Aerosmith run a close second.

#9 ThatLightInYourEyes

ThatLightInYourEyes

    Rushaholic

  • Members
  • 1596 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:"Underwater by the end of this century!" rave the climatologists.
  • Interests:Trying. Just trying.

Posted 16 October 2014 - 12:53 AM

View PostMara, on 15 October 2014 - 11:00 PM, said:

I suppose the writers of that blog are unfamiliar with the Rolling Stones.  Lucky for them they had talent, because they are hands down the ugliest band ever to share a stage with musical instruments.  The members of Aerosmith run a close second.

Yeah, those bands aren't known for looks. Why pick on Rush? Maybe it's a Jocks vs. Nerds thing. That would explain why the article looks like it was written by a teenager.

#10 laughedatbytime

laughedatbytime

    Twin City Cub Fan

  • Members *
  • 69627 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:suburban Minneapolis
  • Interests:women's Uggs, trying to compensate for my small hands, buying gifts for the equipment staff, smashing certain cell phones, that dreamy Judge Berman

Posted 16 October 2014 - 06:31 AM

View PostThatLightInYourEyes, on 16 October 2014 - 12:53 AM, said:

View PostMara, on 15 October 2014 - 11:00 PM, said:

I suppose the writers of that blog are unfamiliar with the Rolling Stones.  Lucky for them they had talent, because they are hands down the ugliest band ever to share a stage with musical instruments.  The members of Aerosmith run a close second.

Yeah, those bands aren't known for looks. Why pick on Rush? Maybe it's a Jocks vs. Nerds thing. That would explain why the article looks like it was written by a teenager.
The whole thing looks like it was written by a sixth grader.    Or maybe Spaghetti Lee.     The other articles are just as pathetic.

#11 treeduck

treeduck

    Tenacious T

  • Members *
  • 83472 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester, England

Posted 16 October 2014 - 01:11 PM

HAAHAHHAHAAHHAH!

:LMAO:

#12 Snyder80

Snyder80

    Prime Mover

  • Members
  • 500 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gardners, PA.
  • Interests:reading, writing, fishing, kayaing, learning to do basic construction, cooking, wine, music (obviously), being a good husband and father.

Posted 20 October 2014 - 02:36 AM

I've never understood the whole Rush is ugly thing.  I mean have some of these so called comedic critics ever taken a long gander at some other bands.  Cast a gaze upon Ratt during the video for "Round and Round" or take a look at a picture of Jeff Keith (lead singer of Tesla) circa 2008 or so and tell me that picture doesn't scream "Tales from the Crypt".  Rush certainly had their bouts with bad fashion but overrall they look like pretty average guys.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users