Freedom_Fighter Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 the other day i was at the theater to watch Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and a trailor for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire came on before it. man i can't freakin wait to see this movie! the trailor just looked EXCELLENT. it looked like it has a lot more action and stuff in it than the other ones, which makes sense i guess cuz the book had more action than the first 3 too. and is it just me or does Hermione get better-looking in every movie? i'm serious, she looks even hotter in Goblet of Fire than she was in Prisoner of Azkaban! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaine mac Roth Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 As a die-hard Harry Potter fan I'm really looking forward to Goblet of Fire as, with the exception of HBP, its my favourite of the books. As for Emma WAtson eho plays Hermione, it'll be legal next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-13 Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 OMG I can't wait either!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_w00t2.gif http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_laughbounce2.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaine mac Roth Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 QUOTE (D-13 @ Jul 31 2005, 09:58 PM) OMG I can't wait either!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_w00t2.gif http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_laughbounce2.gif Is that for the film or for Hermione to turn 16. Interestingly enough, did you realise that the actress who plays Moaning Myrtle is actually 40 now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-13 Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 QUOTE (Slaine mac Roth @ Jul 31 2005, 04:45 PM) QUOTE (D-13 @ Jul 31 2005, 09:58 PM) OMG I can't wait either!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_w00t2.gif http://wyldwytch.com/style_emoticons/default/mf_laughbounce2.gif Is that for the film or for Hermione to turn 16. Interestingly enough, did you realise that the actress who plays Moaning Myrtle is actually 40 now? LMAO....FOR THE FILM!!!! For Harry! and Ron! LMAO!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostGirl Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I am absolutely dying to see this...can't wait till November! And Dan's pretty cute, but Rupert is my favorite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (Slaine mac Roth @ Jul 31 2005, 04:50 PM) As a die-hard Harry Potter fan I'm really looking forward to Goblet of Fire as, with the exception of HBP, its my favourite of the books. As for Emma WAtson eho plays Hermione, it'll be legal next year Well said Slaine, well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 1, 2005 Author Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (Slaine mac Roth @ Jul 31 2005, 04:50 PM) As a die-hard Harry Potter fan I'm really looking forward to Goblet of Fire as, with the exception of HBP, its my favourite of the books. As for Emma WAtson eho plays Hermione, it'll be legal next year hell yea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 i can't wait for this movie either - the book is fantastic and exciting, however, i don't have my hopes up TOO high. i say this after the bitter disappoinment my wife and i experienced with the third movie. i'm not saying the movie wasn't done well, in fact i thought the directing style was excellent and it was very enjoyable, BUT we made the stupid mistake of re-reading the book RIGHT before the movie came out - BIG mistake. i highly recommend no one to re-read the 4th book (if you've read it) before the movie, because when we did that we couldn't help but notice the gaping holes, the huge chunks of the book that were just ripped out. admittedly, the crucial things were there, but it really lost a good bit in the translation with some of the heart and soul being torn away in favor of getting through the plot in 140 minutes - it felt like a mad race to get it all in, and still so much had to be sacrificed. book 4 is a much bigger book, and i can only imagine what won't be in the movie... i guess i'm just complaining in general about books being translated into movies (though the LOTR did the best job i've ever seen) - the harry potter movies are all great, but they just aren't the books - because book 4 i think is significantly better than the already great first 3 books, i have the temptation to get really excited, and i am in part, but cuatiously so - hopefully by the time the movie comes out, i'll have forgotten all the parts from the book that get hacked out of the movie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 12:05 PM) i can't wait for this movie either - the book is fantastic and exciting, however, i don't have my hopes up TOO high. i say this after the bitter disappoinment my wife and i experienced with the third movie. i'm not saying the movie wasn't done well, in fact i thought the directing style was excellent and it was very enjoyable, BUT we made the stupid mistake of re-reading the book RIGHT before the movie came out - BIG mistake. i highly recommend no one to re-read the 4th book (if you've read it) before the movie, because when we did that we couldn't help but notice the gaping holes, the huge chunks of the book that were just ripped out. admittedly, the crucial things were there, but it really lost a good bit in the translation with some of the heart and soul being torn away in favor of getting through the plot in 140 minutes - it felt like a mad race to get it all in, and still so much had to be sacrificed. book 4 is a much bigger book, and i can only imagine what won't be in the movie... i guess i'm just complaining in general about books being translated into movies (though the LOTR did the best job i've ever seen) - the harry potter movies are all great, but they just aren't the books - because book 4 i think is significantly better than the already great first 3 books, i have the temptation to get really excited, and i am in part, but cuatiously so - hopefully by the time the movie comes out, i'll have forgotten all the parts from the book that get hacked out of the movie... I understand where you're coming from goob. The books are always better than the movies, and I think it's because of the simple fact that you can't cram a 800 page book like Harry Potter into 3 and a half hours of film. I am a huge fan of Harry Potter, both the books and the movies, and I've learned to accept the fact that there are going to be a lot of parts that are cut from the books that they just cannot afford to put into the movies. With that said, I try to enjoy the movies for what they're worth, and read the books for the complete story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (NeilPeartFan2112 @ Aug 1 2005, 12:40 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 12:05 PM) i can't wait for this movie either - the book is fantastic and exciting, however, i don't have my hopes up TOO high. i say this after the bitter disappoinment my wife and i experienced with the third movie. i'm not saying the movie wasn't done well, in fact i thought the directing style was excellent and it was very enjoyable, BUT we made the stupid mistake of re-reading the book RIGHT before the movie came out - BIG mistake. i highly recommend no one to re-read the 4th book (if you've read it) before the movie, because when we did that we couldn't help but notice the gaping holes, the huge chunks of the book that were just ripped out. admittedly, the crucial things were there, but it really lost a good bit in the translation with some of the heart and soul being torn away in favor of getting through the plot in 140 minutes - it felt like a mad race to get it all in, and still so much had to be sacrificed. book 4 is a much bigger book, and i can only imagine what won't be in the movie... i guess i'm just complaining in general about books being translated into movies (though the LOTR did the best job i've ever seen) - the harry potter movies are all great, but they just aren't the books - because book 4 i think is significantly better than the already great first 3 books, i have the temptation to get really excited, and i am in part, but cuatiously so - hopefully by the time the movie comes out, i'll have forgotten all the parts from the book that get hacked out of the movie... I understand where you're coming from goob. The books are always better than the movies, and I think it's because of the simple fact that you can't cram a 800 page book like Harry Potter into 3 and a half hours of film. I am a huge fan of Harry Potter, both the books and the movies, and I've learned to accept the fact that there are going to be a lot of parts that are cut from the books that they just cannot afford to put into the movies. With that said, I try to enjoy the movies for what they're worth, and read the books for the complete story. agreed, and i do also accept the movies for what they are. i've seen them many, many times. my main point i guess is to try and not read the book right before you see a movie for the first time, for when it's really fresh in your head, the omissions become glaring and especially disappointing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 12:58 PM) QUOTE (NeilPeartFan2112 @ Aug 1 2005, 12:40 PM) QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 12:05 PM) i can't wait for this movie either - the book is fantastic and exciting, however, i don't have my hopes up TOO high. i say this after the bitter disappoinment my wife and i experienced with the third movie. i'm not saying the movie wasn't done well, in fact i thought the directing style was excellent and it was very enjoyable, BUT we made the stupid mistake of re-reading the book RIGHT before the movie came out - BIG mistake. i highly recommend no one to re-read the 4th book (if you've read it) before the movie, because when we did that we couldn't help but notice the gaping holes, the huge chunks of the book that were just ripped out. admittedly, the crucial things were there, but it really lost a good bit in the translation with some of the heart and soul being torn away in favor of getting through the plot in 140 minutes - it felt like a mad race to get it all in, and still so much had to be sacrificed. book 4 is a much bigger book, and i can only imagine what won't be in the movie... i guess i'm just complaining in general about books being translated into movies (though the LOTR did the best job i've ever seen) - the harry potter movies are all great, but they just aren't the books - because book 4 i think is significantly better than the already great first 3 books, i have the temptation to get really excited, and i am in part, but cuatiously so - hopefully by the time the movie comes out, i'll have forgotten all the parts from the book that get hacked out of the movie... I understand where you're coming from goob. The books are always better than the movies, and I think it's because of the simple fact that you can't cram a 800 page book like Harry Potter into 3 and a half hours of film. I am a huge fan of Harry Potter, both the books and the movies, and I've learned to accept the fact that there are going to be a lot of parts that are cut from the books that they just cannot afford to put into the movies. With that said, I try to enjoy the movies for what they're worth, and read the books for the complete story. agreed, and i do also accept the movies for what they are. i've seen them many, many times. my main point i guess is to try and not read the book right before you see a movie for the first time, for when it's really fresh in your head, the omissions become glaring and especially disappointing... That's why I never do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro2112 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Good thing I never learned how to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (pedro2112 @ Aug 1 2005, 01:30 PM) Good thing I never learned how to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 1, 2005 Author Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 12:05 PM) i can't wait for this movie either - the book is fantastic and exciting, however, i don't have my hopes up TOO high. i say this after the bitter disappoinment my wife and i experienced with the third movie. i'm not saying the movie wasn't done well, in fact i thought the directing style was excellent and it was very enjoyable, BUT we made the stupid mistake of re-reading the book RIGHT before the movie came out - BIG mistake. i highly recommend no one to re-read the 4th book (if you've read it) before the movie, because when we did that we couldn't help but notice the gaping holes, the huge chunks of the book that were just ripped out. admittedly, the crucial things were there, but it really lost a good bit in the translation with some of the heart and soul being torn away in favor of getting through the plot in 140 minutes - it felt like a mad race to get it all in, and still so much had to be sacrificed. book 4 is a much bigger book, and i can only imagine what won't be in the movie... i guess i'm just complaining in general about books being translated into movies (though the LOTR did the best job i've ever seen) - the harry potter movies are all great, but they just aren't the books - because book 4 i think is significantly better than the already great first 3 books, i have the temptation to get really excited, and i am in part, but cuatiously so - hopefully by the time the movie comes out, i'll have forgotten all the parts from the book that get hacked out of the movie... i agree man. well, maybe not entirely, in that i really wasn't BITTERLY disappointed by the third movie. i still love all the movies. but i definitely agree that the books are better than the movies, and yes the 3rd one was missing the most and seemed quite rushed. i mean really most of the stuff that was left out i don't really lament not being there, except that i cannot BELIEVE that they cut out the quidditch cup! that was the very first book that they won the quidditch cup in, it was supposed to be a big deal and all they did was just show the one game. i mean the third one was the shortest movie, i'm sure they could have added an extra twenty minutes to the movie to make a scene for the final quidditch game where they win the cup, and add some dialogue into the movie about the cup. but anyway, yea the third movie was better than the second movie IMO but a little disappointing compared to the book. i have a good feeling about the fourth one though. i mean yea they'll probably have to leave a lot out but once again most of it is probably stuff i don't mind them cutting out, just as long as they have all the main things like the three challenges and the yule ball and the world cup and all that good stuff it'll be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 and of course the big scene at the graveyard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bastille Night Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 QUOTE (Slaine mac Roth @ Jul 31 2005, 05:50 PM) As a die-hard Harry Potter fan I'm really looking forward to Goblet of Fire as, with the exception of HBP, its my favourite of the books. As for Emma WAtson eho plays Hermione, it'll be legal next year I was watching POA last night, wondering if I was the only dirty old man who was thinking this. Apparently not it seems! Loved all the books, and the movies. The first three books were rather short compared to books 4, 5, and 6, so it will be interesting to see how well they compress the longer books into a movie timeframe. Hopefully it'll work out alright! Rushgoober's comments have given me an idea for another thread! High time I started one since I've been slacking lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 QUOTE (rushgoober @ Aug 1 2005, 06:59 PM) and of course the big scene at the graveyard! well yea that's a given lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaine mac Roth Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 QUOTE (Bastille Night @ Aug 2 2005, 12:21 AM) I was watching POA last night, wondering if I was the only dirty old man who was thinking this. Apparently not it seems! If you look at this picture, you should feel guilty http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a222/jazzbass2112/Harry%20Potter/ewhrca12.jpg however, looking at this one maybe not http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a222/jazzbass2112/Harry%20Potter/snapshot20050508220453.jpg and if you need one reason to go and see GOF, try http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a222/jazzbass2112/Harry%20Potter/Posey.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom_Fighter Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 Fleur and Hermione Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilPeartFan2112 Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 Congrats on post #5,000 D! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-13 Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 (((((GRIN))))) 102 more days!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-13 Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 post #5000 goes to Harry Potter http://www.inthecore.com/NonCGI/graemlins/witch.gif http://www.inthecore.com/NonCGI/graemlins/witch.gif http://www.inthecore.com/NonCGI/graemlins/witch.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-13 Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 QUOTE (NeilPeartFan2112 @ Aug 9 2005, 03:34 PM) Congrats on post #5,000 D! thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodoff Baldrick Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 QUOTE (Slaine mac Roth @ Jul 31 2005, 04:50 PM) As for Emma WAtson eho plays Hermione, it'll be legal next year But the Weasley twins already are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now