1-0-0-1-0-0-1

In a perfect world we'd get to see the Rangers -- should they win this thing -- do it on their home field in front of their fans who have been waiting since 1961to see them win their first Series, but they gotta take care of business tonight. Besides, having a perfect postseason road record, especially with the wild card round added in, would be a nice accomplishment.

The singing in Ceiling Unlimited never struck me as annoying or odd. I really like that song and have it ranked waaaaaay the hell higher. The others in this grouping, yes, prime examples of Geddy trying too hard to put emotion into Neil's lyrics. That's a whole other topic right there, actually -- I think Neil lost his way as far as writing song lyrics on the later albums, especially S&A and CA where he found himself writing wordy anti-religion rants that Geddy had to somehow edit into something he can sing, and by the time he was done with them they didn't sound like Neil lyrics anymore. As for Cygnus X-1, I always put aside Geddy's singing on those earlier albums. Anything pre-PW is going to find Geddy not yet in total control of his voice, and I can deal with it because the music is so damn good.

You did something I did on my list -- you grouped what I like to call the "up-tempo low-intensity happy-rocking album closers" together. I have six in my grouping, and they're at 121-126. A little higher than on yours -- I figure they're not horrible songs, but while they have some energy, they're basically empty-calorie filler tracks that never would have been included in the days of the 40-minute vinyl albums.

I have Color of Right at #152. I like the line "You're so full of what is right, you can't see what is true," but the rest of the lyrics aren't hitting me in any way, and musically it's pretty mundane. It's a song that gets skipped 99 times out of 100.

Cool, another list. No argument from me on these bottom three. Good examples of Rush being very non-Rush-like.

Hey Dweez! Good to see you.

https://www.classicrockhistory.com/why-jimmy-hendrix-called-chicagos-terry-kath-the-best-guitarist-in-the-universe/ https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/man-jimi-hendrix-called-best-guitarist/

https://www.mlb.com/news/astros-dusty-baker-retirement-announcement

AI would be smart enough to include Peter Frampton and Terry Kath in a list of the top-250 best guitarists of all time, even if asked to model a list that RS might compile. No, we're seeing human error here.

Another criminal omission. Terry Kath -- the player Jimi Hendrix thought was the best in the world at the time, and who fronted one of the most unique and popular bands of the '60s and '70s -- didn't make the list. You'd think Kath and Frampton would be on RS' radar? I do give them credit for including Tosin Abasi at 99.

I'm not surprised that RS didn't include certain players that only guitar players have heard of. I'm betting none of those editors and writers have ever heard of Guthrie Govan or Allan Holdsworth. But they did include Joan Jett. Yes, Joan f**king Jett, all the way up at #76, is ranked higher than Wes Montgomery and Larry Carlton. That tells us the real deal -- this is not a list of the most talented guitar players ever. That is not what RS does. Their interest in covering music is more about how culturally significant they think a band or player is. That said, do I still think this list is shit? Absolutely, and Rick Beato very efficiently outlined why. If RS' aim is to list the top 250 culturally significant guitarists of all time, the fact that they didn't include Peter Frampton -- who has both talent and cultural significance -- makes the list null and void all by itself.

The Rangers need to score their runs early, can't count on scoring a lot against the Dbacks bullpen, though they've done pretty well against some good bullpens so far in these playoffs.

Garcia pulled a page out of the Astros' playbook and embraced the role of the villain. And he didn't have to cheat to become the villain.

I just Liked a post containing a Creed song. Look well upon it, because you'll never see it again. Unless the Rangers win the World Series and you post it again.

It feels weird as an Islanders fan to say "Let's go Rangers," but this is baseball so LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

Is it me, or are these Fox announcers' praise for the Rangers a little begrudging? Seems like they're pulling for Houston. There are times where they sound like they don't know the Astros are down by 8 f**king runs.

It's amazing how much power he can generate with no stride or leg kick. Total old school swing. He just pivots and hits the ball on the screws.

As soon as I saw Altuve walking up to the plate in the top of the 9th, Astros down two runs with two guys on, I turned the TV off. That little shit hitting a 3-run homer was a foregone conclusion and I had no need to watch it happen.

Hopefully they go away again tonight. That team is annoying to watch.

On behalf of the administrators of The Rush Forum, I hereby present the 392nd Solar Federalist badge to NoahLutz... NoahLutz, you have assumed control.... ...of The Rush Forum's Solar Federalist badge no. 392...Congratulations! Also, your badge has been added to the Hallowed Hall, and below is a mini-badge that you can add to your sig, if you wish. Congrats!

Found, bitch.

https://www.mlb.com/news/2023-playoff-predictions-from-mlb-experts Playoff predictions from back on Oct 7th.

Some busted-ass brackets out there. How many people picked Philly and Arizona for the NLCS?

The Braves were like that back in the '90s and early '00s. Fourteen straight (!!!) division titles, five NL pennants, but only one Series win. I know the Yankees got in their way a lot back then, but that Atlanta team had one of the best pitching staffs in recent memory and they should have won more titles.

Yeah, their only recent Series win was in the pandemic-shortened 2020 season, but they did have the best record in the league that year. They were the only team to finish with a winning percentage over .700 (43–17, .717).