Czarcasm

SOOOOO glad to see Rush is cleaning up here. If we lost to Journey I would have to reconsider some things in my life.

This record needs vapor trails treatment IMO. If they have access to the master tapes they should at least try to thicken it up a little. The original is so tinny and quiet that I have to crank up my volume by half just to properly hear the damn thing!

The remixed version is soooooo much better if you ask me. I would have never enjoyed songs like Secret Touch, Nocturne, Sweet Miracle and Freeze without it. Very glad it was released cause Clockwork Angels let me down.

Fishstick Rhythms Capture my cods A very thin Filet We are the freaks The attendants of your sinks

You mean like how AFtK and Hemispheres are my trash but they're half of this forums treasure?

so then i guess it takes one to know one huh "TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE HUHUEHUEHUEHUE" My, what a mature sounding post. Are you even trying or do you want to sound like an 11 year old boy at recess? Your opinion on this matter has been [ ] Validated [X] discarded But no that was bad. Seriously, improve your arguing skills or go back to r/atheism. I know you are but what am I? At least I dont shape my world view on a 2000 year old myth I'm not religious. In fact I've been an atheist my entire life. However I don't hold what I believe over others like you. You come off sounding like an arrogant prick who has nothing better to do than bash religion on a band's message board. If you care about the opinions and beliefs of virtual strangers so much maybe you should take a good long look in the mirror, bub because what you're doing is pathetic. If I were a mod you'd be banned for shit posting and religious intolerance. And I'm on your side of the religion vs atheism debate. Imagine what those who aren't think about you and your existence.

so then i guess it takes one to know one huh "TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE HUHUEHUEHUEHUE" My, what a mature sounding post. Are you even trying or do you want to sound like an 11 year old boy at recess? Your opinion on this matter has been [ ] Validated [X] discarded But no that was bad. Seriously, improve your arguing skills or go back to r/atheism.

That...that was very thorough. Thanks for the explanation, I think I understand better now. It's like another poster here said. It's more than just appearance but a combination of other traits as well.

I never said anything similar to that. Tom Sawyer and other hits are played so often I was wondering if they needed to be played when the majority of people at Rush concerts are usually die hard fans. you didn't say it? I've got the proof right here I'm honestly confused. I never said the words Dog Years or La VIlla in this thread. I said that a couple of GOOD songs from test for echo could stand to be revived along with unplayed tracks from the rest of their career. I didn't mention La Villa when I brought up over played songs, that was you, champ. no I saw it Then find it and deliver it to me I literally have all day. Unless you're a liar who's just trying to start shit. I've got the evidence right here Find me a direct quote where I say that Dog Years should be played over La Villa in concert. I'm genuinely curious what your angle is here, bub.

I never said anything similar to that. Tom Sawyer and other hits are played so often I was wondering if they needed to be played when the majority of people at Rush concerts are usually die hard fans. you didn't say it? I've got the proof right here I'm honestly confused. I never said the words Dog Years or La VIlla in this thread. I said that a couple of GOOD songs from test for echo could stand to be revived along with unplayed tracks from the rest of their career. I didn't mention La Villa when I brought up over played songs, that was you, champ. no I saw it Then find it and deliver it to me I literally have all day. Unless you're a liar who's just trying to start shit. I've got the evidence right here According to what you quoted above the person who compared Dog Years to La Villa first is you, with me just reiterating what you said. I can't tell if you're a troll or just retarded, but judging by the number of posts you've made I'm gonna wager you're the latter. But seriously, what are you doing?

I never said anything similar to that. Tom Sawyer and other hits are played so often I was wondering if they needed to be played when the majority of people at Rush concerts are usually die hard fans. you didn't say it? I've got the proof right here I'm honestly confused. I never said the words Dog Years or La VIlla in this thread. I said that a couple of GOOD songs from test for echo could stand to be revived along with unplayed tracks from the rest of their career. I didn't mention La Villa when I brought up over played songs, that was you, champ. no I saw it Then find it and deliver it to me I literally have all day. Unless you're a liar who's just trying to start shit.

I like it also man. it makes me think of hiking through the Canadian Shield near Georgian bay. Drinking a few beers, having a few tokes along the way... :smoke: It's a very Canadian sounding album much like Moving Pictures, but whereas Moving Pictures is an album for downtown Toronto commutes, TfE is for losing yourself in nature. Limbo kicks so much ass it's unreal.

None of them. Geddy Lee is a superb musician and my favourite bassist of all time, but he's the ugliest man I've ever laid eyes on. Why all of you want to jump his bones is beyond me.

I never said anything similar to that. Tom Sawyer and other hits are played so often I was wondering if they needed to be played when the majority of people at Rush concerts are usually die hard fans. Actually, I'm pretty sure that the majority at Rush concerts is made up of casual Rush fans who have greatest hits compilations, semi-serious Rush fans who have a few of the albums, friends of die-hard Rush fans who have been convinced to come along and give the band a chance, classic rock fans who like to see all the old acts that are still playing, people who enjoy rock shows and are out to have a good time, and other assorted folk who want to hear the songs they know, not deep cuts from albums most people don't even know about. Rush probably does have MORE die-hards in their audience than most bands from their era, and certainly enough of those to support them in continuing a career at some level, but it is definitely the seekers of Tom Sawyer and The Spirit Of Radio who make these big tours and fancy productions financially viable. I, for one, am grateful to them! Rush is a polarizing band. I've never met a single soul who liked a few songs but not the rest. It's either "Yeah Man I F*ckin love Rush!" Or it's "Aw man I F*ckin hate Rush!" As I've said previously in the thread, I don't know how anybody can justify going to see a 2+ hour show when they might know 4 songs tops, especially currently when a lot of newer material is played. For instance, I'm not a huge fan of the Stones, but firstly: I would get bored hearing Satisfaction, Start me up, Paint it Black and Miss you. I know them too well and wouldn't WANT to hear them live. Secondly If I'm not a stones fan but like a few of their songs, WHY would I even go to a stones show? Hell, even if I had the money and the time I still wouldn't go because I have little interest in watching a two hour concert of a band I'm not really a fan of. This applies to pretty much any rock band. You don't seem to understand anyone but yourself, which is why this thread was started. Maybe that will change as you grow older. DOHOHOHOHOHO YOU SURE SHOWED ME!!! AM I RIGHT, GUYS? [Circle jerking intensifies]

I never said anything similar to that. Tom Sawyer and other hits are played so often I was wondering if they needed to be played when the majority of people at Rush concerts are usually die hard fans. Actually, I'm pretty sure that the majority at Rush concerts is made up of casual Rush fans who have greatest hits compilations, semi-serious Rush fans who have a few of the albums, friends of die-hard Rush fans who have been convinced to come along and give the band a chance, classic rock fans who like to see all the old acts that are still playing, people who enjoy rock shows and are out to have a good time, and other assorted folk who want to hear the songs they know, not deep cuts from albums most people don't even know about. Rush probably does have MORE die-hards in their audience than most bands from their era, and certainly enough of those to support them in continuing a career at some level, but it is definitely the seekers of Tom Sawyer and The Spirit Of Radio who make these big tours and fancy productions financially viable. I, for one, am grateful to them! Rush is a polarizing band. I've never met a single soul who liked a few songs but not the rest. It's either "Yeah Man I F*ckin love Rush!" Or it's "Aw man I F*ckin hate Rush!" As I've said previously in the thread, I don't know how anybody can justify going to see a 2+ hour show when they might know 4 songs tops, especially currently when a lot of newer material is played. For instance, I'm not a huge fan of the Stones, but firstly: I would get bored hearing Satisfaction, Start me up, Paint it Black and Miss you. I know them too well and wouldn't WANT to hear them live. Secondly If I'm not a stones fan but like a few of their songs, WHY would I even go to a stones show? Hell, even if I had the money and the time I still wouldn't go because I have little interest in watching a two hour concert of a band I'm not really a fan of. This applies to pretty much any rock band.