D'Artagnan

Yes Craig David

QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Mar 25 2008, 09:16 PM) You've been posting those tame, intentionally anti-intense movie titles since this thread started. It was kinda funny the first few times, but then you just kept posting them, and it ceased being funny...but you knew that. And you knew it would start to annoy people...and it did, which I'm sure brought some joy to your life. That's pathetic, but I digress... That is incorrect. The thread was formulated in a somewhat vague manner, leaving the readers to interpret it as they wish. Intensity is not really measured by shock value, so you cannot dismiss movies like The Scorpion King, The Legend of 1900, John Rambo, On the Line.. among others, as being "anti-intense". In a way, all these movie had me left in a "what did i just watch?" state, each in different ways. And I'd appreciate it if you cut the assumptions, and personal insults, I don't recall insulting anyone in this thread. QUOTE You continually post things for the sake of being annoying (you've got that part working pretty well), while trying to come across as someone who is intellectually superior (that part isn't working out too well for you). In case you haven't noticed, exactly zero people here are impressed with you. Was that your goal when you joined here? What an incoherent conspiracy theory. "Being annoying" and "trying to come across as someone who is intellectually superior" do not go hand in hand. Supposing that I am "trying to come across as someone who is intellectually superior" (which is wrong, by the way), the de facto superiority would not be annoying in that case. QUOTE Posting just to see how much you can annoy people is childish. Here's the deal: Think you can act like a respectful adult here? So far you've shown very little indication of being able to do that. What's childish is getting loads of personal insults because of such great sins as calling a movie which is not everyone's cup of tea "interesting", and posting the names of several movies which someone thinks they're "anti-intense". Right ! QUOTE But hey, we're nothing if not patient. Show us you're capable of acting like a man instead of a child. Otherwise, instead of Jack deleting your posts, I'll just delete YOU. Lead by example, instead of regurgitating these "threats".

The Sound of Music.

QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Mar 25 2008, 09:16 PM) QUOTE (D'Artagnan @ Mar 25 2008, 09:59 PM)QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Mar 25 2008, 02:38 PM) QUOTE (Godeater2112 @ Mar 25 2008, 03:17 PM) QUOTE (D'Artagnan @ Mar 25 2008, 03:05 PM) Home Alone 2 Just because the only movie that gets your rocks off involves slaves being forced to eat human defecation or else they are murdered doesn't mean you need to be a sarcastic arsehole in other people's threads. Yeah, what he said. Knock it off or I'll start deleting your posts. That would be abusive. The admins wouldn't be too happy about mods abusing their position. What movies I consider intense and whether I like them or not is none of your business. You've been posting those tame, intentionally anti-intense movie titles since this thread started. It was kinda funny the first few times, but then you just kept posting them, and it ceased being funny...but you knew that. And you knew it would start to annoy people...and it did, which I'm sure brought some joy to your life. That's pathetic, but I digress... You continually post things for the sake of being annoying (you've got that part working pretty well), while trying to come across as someone who is intellectually superior (that part isn't working out too well for you). In case you haven't noticed, exactly zero people here are impressed with you. Was that your goal when you joined here? Posting just to see how much you can annoy people is childish. Here's the deal: Think you can act like a respectful adult here? So far you've shown very little indication of being able to do that. But hey, we're nothing if not patient. Show us you're capable of acting like a man instead of a child. Otherwise, instead of Jack deleting your posts, I'll just delete YOU. How's that sound? That sounded as intense as The Sound Of Music.

QUOTE (Snowman @ Mar 13 2008, 02:16 AM) Anyone seen this movie? Is it any good? It depends on your expectations out of it. If you take it for what it is, a high-budget popcorn movie, it's pretty "good". Nothing more, though.

John Rambo

QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Mar 25 2008, 02:38 PM) QUOTE (Godeater2112 @ Mar 25 2008, 03:17 PM) QUOTE (D'Artagnan @ Mar 25 2008, 03:05 PM) Home Alone 2 Just because the only movie that gets your rocks off involves slaves being forced to eat human defecation or else they are murdered doesn't mean you need to be a sarcastic arsehole in other people's threads. Yeah, what he said. Knock it off or I'll start deleting your posts. That would be abusive. The admins wouldn't be too happy about mods abusing their position. What movies I consider intense and whether I like them or not is none of your business.

Home Alone 2

Thr3e

The Frames Craig David

Having your head repeatably smashed against a brick wall Craig David

Step Up 2 the Streets

Behind Enemy Lines was pretty good too, for a bad movie.

Queen of the Damned

Amon Amarth Necrophagist

Crossroads

Dead or Alive

On the Line

Necrophagist Craig David

Amon Amarth Necrophagist

2 Fast 2 Furious

Hello, good people of the Rush forum. This video is absolutely a must watch, enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPBvFXf9Q2U

Agent Orange Craig David

Get Carter

QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Mar 24 2008, 02:51 PM) QUOTE (D'Artagnan @ Mar 24 2008, 03:43 PM) QUOTE (Ancient Ways @ Mar 20 2008, 10:36 PM) QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Mar 19 2008, 02:20 PM) I have read states that the movie depicts children being tortured and raped. Yes, the children were played by people of adult age, but I don't think that makes it all right and apparently you are the only one who does. I shudder to think why anyone would enjoy a movie like this, it sounds pretty depraved to me. The mouseketeer's argument is absolutely asinine. Is he really saying that a movie about the sexual abuse of teens is not actually about teens since the actors are adults? Ludicrous. No, moron; the whole aspect of kids/teens has been scrapped from the movie. The "legal" actors were representing their "legal" character counterparts. I already clarified this before, but why read when you can jump on the gun acting like the very imbecile that you are ? Stop. Now. Why are you being selective ? I was respectful to everyone in this thread, until they started with the "insults", and they did reap what they sowed. I invite you to read the thread again, and see who was being offended and who initiated "this".