Wrath of Khan Question

[Khan]

QUOTE (Rushman14 @ May 11 2010, 11:29 AM)

I cant say I even understand the question.

You don't want to.

[Rush Cocky]

QUOTE (ouchithurts @ Oct 12 2008, 09:10 PM)

HBO is running Wrath of Khan this month and after watching it for the gazillionth time I am troubled by something. After Khan sets the Genesis device to explode why couldn't they lock onto to it and beam it into deep space in wide dispersal? This surely would have made it null and void and Spock would not have had to been killed. And for those who wish to think this can't be done I ask that you refer to "Wolf in the Fold" of the original series and see what was done to Redjac.

Nuclear radiation screwed up the transporter so that this was not possible.

[workingcinderellaman]

QUOTE (Rush Cocky @ May 13 2010, 09:13 AM)

QUOTE (ouchithurts @ Oct 12 2008, 09:10 PM) HBO is running Wrath of Khan this month and after watching it for  the gazillionth time I am troubled by something. After Khan sets the Genesis device to explode why couldn't they lock onto to it and beam it into deep space in wide dispersal? This surely would have made it null and void and Spock would not have had to been killed. And for those who wish to think this can't be done I ask that you refer to "Wolf in the Fold" of the original series and see what was done to Redjac. Nuclear radiation screwed up the transporter so that this was not possible. That's it. It was in the trekkie newsletter.   Anyway, it would have been a stupid ending to simply beam that thing away.

[Slaine mac Roth]

QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Oct 13 2008, 10:26 AM)

'Star Trek' sucks, 'Star Wars' (the OT, anyway) is better!

Can I just say that, although I like Star Trek and Star Wars about equally, neither of them can hold a candle to Firefly/Serenity