QUOTE (Presto-digitation @ Jan 18 2010, 08:59 AM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Jan 18 2010, 01:28 AM) "Avatar" may have the year's best visual effects, the most technologically-advanced production, and be the biggest money-maker, but did it really deserve the Globe for best MOVIE? Did it really have better acting and a better script than "Up In The Air?"
Shouldn't the best movie be more than visual effects and ticket sales?
I think Inglorious Basterds was the better film, myself. But then again I think Quentin deserves it almost every time out too.
I think Inglorious Basterds deserves it as well. Quinten Tarentino has yet to disappoint me.