savagegrace26

How appropriate ;)

What's all this fukking shit about?

More like a Shit Muffuletta 16. Interesting...according to a post I saw within the past few days, savagegrace seemed to know that Spaghetti was coming back. I hate deceptive people. I despise liars. You are the only one who can straighten this out. Nothing left to straighten out. Perineal Peart was indeed Spaghetti. I say "was" because the Perineal account is now suspended also. Neil's not going to be happy. I'm pretty sure you're the only one who will miss him. I preferred him over some others... Over me right? Why don't you just come out and say it? I have no respect for those who skirt around sh*t and don't say what they really want to say and just vaguely "imply" things. This is the passive-aggressive sh*t I was referring to in that SOCN thread. a guy who self-censors the word shit is berating someone else for not coming right out and saying something? :D I thought it was against the "rules" to say "shit". But I'm censoring it for Len. A 13-year old doesn't need to read that sh*t.

And IQ scores are most reliable when they are administered in adulthood.

For reference, Albert Einstein's was just north of 160. I'd guess you took one of the many on-line but not accurate versions. Or maybe you really are in the minuscule % or people with ultra high IQs. Maybe you and Marilyn vos Savant should hook up. Yeah, maybe. :D No, friend, that number is real. It was a few years back, but it's from an actual evaluation. By "a few years back" he means when he was evaluated in the second-grade. He posted that somewhere in this thread. His IQ has obviously dropped a few notches over the years...

For reference, Albert Einstein's was just north of 160. I'd guess you took one of the many on-line but not accurate versions. Or maybe you really are in the minuscule % or people with ultra high IQs. Maybe you and Marilyn vos Savant should hook up. Yeah, maybe. :D No, friend, that number is real. It was a few years back, but it's from an actual evaluation. By "a few years back" he means when he was evaluated in the second-grade. He posted that somewhere in this thread. His IQ has obviously dropped a few notches over the years...

It's just about...life...man :smoke: Lamneth is an anagram for "anthem L" where L stands for Life. It's a life anthem . . . ? Heh. Never thought about it like that. The song still sucks, though. Do you mean to say you don't like it? Or is it an objective fact that it "sucks"? Haha I just don't like it. It's just about...life...man :smoke: Lamneth is an anagram for "anthem L" where L stands for Life. It's a life anthem . . . ? Heh. Never thought about it like that. The song still sucks, though. Do you mean to say you don't like it? Or is it an objective fact that it "sucks"? Haha I just don't like it. Well, you've passed the "Not LedRush" test... I think you've confused me for Savage Grace. You dont get it.... I don't, either… :| That's why IQ needs to be retested after a number of years have passed ;)

Because Rush stopped making sidelong tracks ;) Or, stopped doing whatever they did on Hemispheres then got famous.

Not at all. I was just making fun of myself because I'm a real attention whore.

It's just about...life...man :smoke: Lamneth is an anagram for "anthem L" where L stands for Life. It's a life anthem . . . ? Heh. Never thought about it like that. The song still sucks, though. Do you mean to say you don't like it? Or is it an objective fact that it "sucks"? Haha I just don't like it. It's just about...life...man :smoke: Lamneth is an anagram for "anthem L" where L stands for Life. It's a life anthem . . . ? Heh. Never thought about it like that. The song still sucks, though. Do you mean to say you don't like it? Or is it an objective fact that it "sucks"? Haha I just don't like it. Well, you've passed the "Not LedRush" test... I think you've confused me for Savage Grace. You dont get it....

Well, I suppose you hit the nail on the head, but I started this thread with pure intentions. I'm not boasting, but I feel like if I start a thread with a question, I should give it an answer. I meant no "cockiness" from the whole thing. :( Call me a baby, but I'm a tad offended that you would think so lowly of someone you don't even know. I'm the biggest c*ck on the board so don't worry about it.

It was the Cliffs Notes version of the Clockwork Angels album minus the Opium.

Anagram would be a good song to analyze. I know a lot of people think it's just a superficial wordplay song but I think there's some interesting subtext hidden in the lyrics.

This is always an interesting topic. Red Lenses would be a good song to analyze.

1-PEEP-PEEP-1-PEEP-PEEP-1

EaglePEEP

You seem smart. I bet you're a jerk.

How relevant: http://www.clsnyder.com/WordPress/2006/08/04/are-smart-people-jerks/ Are smart people jerks ? Are smart people jerks? Albert Einstein is generally remembered as a “warm and fuzzy”, congenial teddy bear of a man, who also happened to be an off the charts genius. The popular perception of the “absent minded Professor” also fits this stereotype. However, another stereotype is that of the autistic, aloof, introverted, socially inept but brilliant geek who generally dislikes people, and avoids contact with them. Some studies of “techies” have confirmed a high incidence of Asperger’s syndrome, suggesting that perhaps the latter stereotype is more apt to be correct. It has long been my experience that, at least in the world of surgery, a “nice” surgeon would have a relatively equal likelihood of being “good”: i.e., technically skilled, well read, efficient, and generally skillful. However, surgeons who most people would consider “jerks” i.e. unfriendly, short tempered, and generally lacking a good bedside manner, have a much higher chance of being “good surgeons”. The rationale proffered for this is that if an incompetent surgeon is a pleasant fellow; nice, easy to get along with, well liked, then his or her incompetence will be “put up with” or at least tolerated by associates, underlings, et cetera. However, if a generally nasty person is also incompetent; coworkers, associates, underlings, will have a much lower threshold for tolerating the person, and would be likely to complain, censure, etc. this individual. Although obvious, this is not an argument in favor of surgeons or anyone else acting like a jerk. Recalling basic logic 101, if 99% of people who are 6’5″ tall are men, it does not follow that all men are 6’5″ tall. An alternative explanation was recently noted in an article about extremely high IQ individuals. The article pointed out that, if the average IQs is 100 “by definition”, and a mildly retarded person (IQ of 75 to 80) interact for long periods of time, the person of average intelligence is likely to become frustrated, and to not have much in common with the mildly retarded individual. This is not to say that the person of average intelligence would have some underlying prejudice against the other person, or would necessarily treat them badly. The idea is simply that a person of average intelligence, if forced to interact 8 to 12 hours a day with people who were mildly to moderately retarded, would likely find it in a difficult and frustrating experience. Therefore, if a person with an IQ of 150 – 160 is exposed on a daily basis to “normal” people (IQ of 100 – 120) they also would likely find it a difficult and frustrating experience, since the difference between their level of intelligence and normal people, and the difference between the normals and retarded individuals (at least in terms of IQ points – a debatable and hotly contested topic) is similar. This argument is used to explain the putative antisocial personality characteristics of the introverted intelligentsia.

Yet you haven't got the intelligence to notice you are making a giant cock of yourself. Only an idiot would be interested in his IQ. I love when people are blunt. High IQ doesn't mean High "common-sense" or "self-awareness". Actually "intelligent" people are more likely to act like giant cocks...

Guess I'll see you tomorrow moderator...

Are you out of your PEEPIN' mind?

You're really going to bring this up? Sure. Just like anyone else brings up whatever else they feel like here. No. Milton was a regular and well-liked poster back in "the day" here at TRF. This is him saying hey! after a long hiatus from the board. I only know what exists within the limits of my own experience, just like anyone else! Yes, because nothing else matters unless it happens in your world, right? I never said that. Oh look. A "moderator" who shows up every other day to moderate or something...

NOOOO....NOOOO.... Do you not read? The sales figures are only from 1991 on...when Soundscan started tracking sales....I knew this would happen... The top selling Rush albums overall are Moving Pictures and 2112. But the RTB has squillions Because it's material is simple, catchy, and easy to digest and is targeted for average simpletons. The same reason why Avatar, Titanic, Star Wars, and Harry Potter are so successful. Roll the Bones is the Titanic of Rush albums. Harry Potter is NOT simple. :/ It isn't. And I cannot be bothered to argue. But HP is something I have learned a lot from. I'll accept that...I have read 4 of the books. The movies are hit and miss. What have you learned? The movies suck! A lot about folklore, languages and growing up I matured alongside the cast, and they helped me cope and understand the ropes of life. They are marvellous. I hadn't read them for six years, or seen the films. So I reread them over the summer and loved them more than I did back in the day! Ok. I was referring specifically to the movies. The books do have quite a bit more depth to them.

I'm holding a PA meeting tonight. My name is Slappy...and I'm a PEEPaholic...

NOOOO....NOOOO.... Do you not read? The sales figures are only from 1991 on...when Soundscan started tracking sales....I knew this would happen... The top selling Rush albums overall are Moving Pictures and 2112. But the RTB has squillions Because it's material is simple, catchy, and easy to digest and is targeted for average simpletons. The same reason why Avatar, Titanic, Star Wars, and Harry Potter are so successful. Roll the Bones is the Titanic of Rush albums. Harry Potter is NOT simple. :/ It isn't. And I cannot be bothered to argue. But HP is something I have learned a lot from. I'll accept that...I have read 4 of the books. The movies are hit and miss. What have you learned?