Jump to content

rushfanNlv

Members
  • Posts

    2073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rushfanNlv

  1. QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Oct 16 2006, 01:59 PM)
    QUOTE (rushfanNlv @ Oct 16 2006, 02:55 PM)
    I've found my next purchase.  It's The GigRig system.  What it allows me to do is use all of my vintage, analog effects with an intelligent interface.

    Here is the concept:  My guitar plugs in to this pedalboard which has 10 effects loops (one stereo for my precious CE-1).  Each loop will house one of my pedals.  From there, there are two outputs which I will send to my pair of 4140's.  I then have a series of user defined presets where I turn the desired effects on and off.  So with one stomp, I can turn on my chorus, delay and overdrive, and turn off my distortion and compressor for example.  There are also switches that allow me to send a signal to my amps to turn on the boost or turn off the reverb: whatever the amps footswitch does, this thing will too. There is also a buffer built in to keep the vintage and newer effects at the same level.  There is level control for each preset as well which allows me to boost the level of a solo preset or decrease the level of a clean preset.  It's just an amazing piece of equipment.  Deciding to use individual stomp boxes means learning to tap dance while you are playing.  With this, it's one stomp shopping so to speak. biggrin.gif  It's similar to the Alex's custom built switching systems he used in the 80's with the difference being the presets.

    I have a rack setup, but no MIDI switching. I have seperate footswitches for all my rack effects, so switching effects on and off is much the same as having stompboxes. I still need to read that link, but this looks interesting.

    The MIDI-8 will be perfect for you then. Check it out. I was planning on getting the PRO-14 but I may go with the MIDI-8 instead.

  2. I've found my next purchase. It's The GigRig system. What it allows me to do is use all of my vintage, analog effects with an intelligent interface.

     

    Here is the concept: My guitar plugs in to this pedalboard which has 10 effects loops (one stereo for my precious CE-1). Each loop will house one of my pedals. From there, there are two outputs which I will send to my pair of 4140's. I then have a series of user defined presets where I turn the desired effects on and off. So with one stomp, I can turn on my chorus, delay and overdrive, and turn off my distortion and compressor for example. There are also switches that allow me to send a signal to my amps to turn on the boost or turn off the reverb: whatever the amps footswitch does, this thing will too. There is also a buffer built in to keep the vintage and newer effects at the same level. There is level control for each preset as well which allows me to boost the level of a solo preset or decrease the level of a clean preset. It's just an amazing piece of equipment. Deciding to use individual stomp boxes means learning to tap dance while you are playing. With this, it's one stomp shopping so to speak. biggrin.gif It's similar to the Alex's custom built switching systems he used in the 80's with the difference being the presets.

  3. I use compression, delay, chorus in that order. Your guitar settings are also important. Don't dime the volume knob and use the second position on your strat if that's what you are using. Mine is set to one coil of the bridge humbucker and the middle single coil in this crappy recording. In this recording I pushed the front end of my recording device way too hard and got some tape distortion but you can hear that the tone is close to the original.

     

     

  4. What pedal did you go with? Do you want to do swells or a lead volume boost?

     

    I have found that the old chrome morleys are freakin awesome! They can be found on Ebay for 80 to 100. Otherwise, the EB's great from what I hear.

     

    Check out www.harmonycentral.com in the user reviews section for some good info.

  5. QUOTE (launchpad67a @ Sep 30 2006, 08:44 PM)
    QUOTE (rushfanNlv @ Sep 30 2006, 05:11 PM)
    QUOTE (launchpad67a @ Sep 30 2006, 07:05 PM)
    QUOTE (_pete_ @ Sep 30 2006, 04:35 PM)
    In that price range try a Peavey Classic 30. It's a good sounding and versatile amp.

    Please don't buy any Peavey amps. They are amateur. Do you see any Peavey amps onstage at any concerts you attend? No, because that are made for amateur players, with little money for pro gear. Unless of course you are an amateur, then by all means, knock yourself out! laugh.gif

    Wow dude. That is a pretty bold, sweeping, generalized statement. I own a Peavey amp and couldn't disagree with you more. The classic series are great amps and produce a very good, basic tone. Have you ever played through a classic 30 or 50?

     

    In fact, I do see pro's using Peavey gear: Alex Lifeson. He used a 5150 on the Test for Echo CD I believe (or was it Counterparts?)

     

    Another user of Peavey gear is Joe Satriani. Is he an amateur?

     

    I can post some clips if you want. I think you'll be surprised.

    Mabey that was a bit harsh but still, Peavey is Not (generally) a "pro series" of music gear. You have to agree on that. If you like the EVH sound, then use a 5150. If you like the Joe Satch sound then buy $200,000 worth of outboard rack gear.

    Both those guys sound is "their sound", why would anyone want to sound like them.

    I refuse to be in bands with guys that have that kind of tone. Don't get me wrong, I'm not above anyone in thinking that way. I just can't stand that sound. It never translates well in a live situation, unless you have the FOH equipment to back it up.

     

    I should also say that I'm a real picky bastard about guitar tone.

    If you like that super saturated sound then fine. I don't, it doesn't sound like a guitar.

    Just my opinion, that's all.

    Fair enough. I totally get where you are coming from.

  6. QUOTE (launchpad67a @ Sep 30 2006, 07:05 PM)
    QUOTE (_pete_ @ Sep 30 2006, 04:35 PM)
    In that price range try a Peavey Classic 30. It's a good sounding and versatile amp.

    Please don't buy any Peavey amps. They are amateur. Do you see any Peavey amps onstage at any concerts you attend? No, because that are made for amateur players, with little money for pro gear. Unless of course you are an amateur, then by all means, knock yourself out! laugh.gif

    Wow dude. That is a pretty bold, sweeping, generalized statement. I own a Peavey amp and couldn't disagree with you more. The classic series are great amps and produce a very good, basic tone. Have you ever played through a classic 30 or 50?

     

    In fact, I do see pro's using Peavey gear: Alex Lifeson. He used a 5150 on the Test for Echo CD I believe (or was it Counterparts?)

     

    Another user of Peavey gear is Joe Satriani. Is he an amateur?

     

    I can post some clips if you want. I think you'll be surprised.

  7. QUOTE (_pete_ @ Sep 30 2006, 06:35 PM)
    In that price range try a Peavey Classic 30. It's a good sounding and versatile amp.

    I couldn't agree more. And stay away from the Marshall AVT series amps. I owned one and it was really, really bad. It's not an all tube amp. It's pre amp is tube but the power amp is solid state.

     

    And yeah, the marshall combo or head is a one trick pony but it does that one trick like no other amp can.

     

    I like the older marshall combo. The 4104's are like a 78 JMP in a combo. Keep your spider and A/B it it for some clean tones if you need to.

  8. QUOTE (KirkDS @ Sep 30 2006, 12:46 PM)
    QUOTE (rushfanNlv @ Sep 29 2006, 12:40 PM)
    Ok.  I have finally finished Red Barchetta.  I'm not 100% happy with the overtones but the whammy bar part and the solo turned out cool! biggrin.gif

    KirkDS on Drums and Me on Guitar Playing Red Barchetta

    Wow dude....I like what you've done with it. Really nice feel on the heavy rythm parts. Sounds great.....(except for the horrendous drumming!)

    You have got to be high! cool.gif That is some of the best drumming I have heard man. It's an honor to play with you even though were not even in the same state.

     

    Thanks for the comment. smile.gif

  9. Yeah for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif 2.gif 2.gif smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif trink39.gif trink39.gif trink39.gif trink39.gif new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif cosmo.gif

     

    Did the other thread have any hints? I got Limbo after your first hint but due to operator error (again) I didn't follow the rules and thought it to be wrong at first.

  10. Looks fishy to me. The paint especially looks too new and orange like (the little bumps like the skin of an orange) to be a vintage MXR. And the LED is a dead giveaway as there were only added in the early 80's. However the knobs look nice and aged....the price does not seem right as compared to the other vintage, block logo MXR's on the bay. I would ask the seller to give you the pot code. All he (or she) has to do is open the pedal, gently lift up the circuit board and read the numbers printed on the level potentiometer. There should be seven numbers starting with 137 that indicate where and in which month and year the pedal was made.

     

    Here is one you should look at.

     

    Script Logo D+. Notice that the seller knew to give the pot code - 1377709 which indicates that the pedal was made in the 9the month of 1977. The 137 is present on all pot codes.

     

    Or...Here is one that is a block logo from 1980. the seller indicates that he has checked the pot codes. BIN for $99.00....that sounds like a deal to me.

  11. QUOTE (Xabiche @ Sep 25 2006, 03:22 PM)
    What's the dif between the "block logo" versions and the older ones?

    The earlier "script logo" pedals (as they have become know as) were made by MXR Innovations and used electronic components made in factories where tolerances were not checked or measured as frequently as they would soon be by the late 70's when the "block logo" pedals were made. What you ended up with was one Micro Amp, for example, that sounded different from the next (not much but noticable to the musicians ear) which was both a good and bad thing IMO. In other words, EVH's Phase 90 might be the only one in the world that sounded exactly like it.

     

    By 1978, MXR had been bought (not sure if it was Dunlop) and the pedals went through a "value engineering" stage where cheaper components were sought out and used and tolerances were closely measured to ensure a consistent product. Still a good product but not the exact same as the script logos. The MXR pedals I own are all of this era and I believe that Alex would have used the same era of pedals since he started using MXR pedals at around this time. Although I have seen a picture of Alex using an MXR distortion + as early as "a farewell to kings" but it was in a back stage warm up situation. By the early 1980's dunlop owned the company and started making it's own version of the same pedals with even cheaper components and the addition of an LED. These pedals would never match the originals or the block logos.

×
×
  • Create New...