Jump to content

mattroland76

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mattroland76

  1. I think its also important to define what we mean by "Synth Era," as Rush began using synthesizers as far back as 2112. Consider Hemispheres, Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures-3 albums that rank very highly for most Rush fans, including ones that loath the albums after MP. Every single track on each of those albums incorporates synth-and yet you never hear any complaints about this!!! Signals and Grace Under Pressure do indeed increase the presence of the synthesizer to next level, but both still have a very strong guitar based foundation to most of the songs. These were transitional albums INTO the "synth period." The apex of this new period is represented by Power Windows and Hold Your Fire, albums where for the first time the guitar provides more of a complimentary/textural role (and of course solos) to the rest of the instrumentation. Presto and Role the Bones are transitional albums OUT of the synth period-they represent a return to more of the balance you had on Signals and Grace Under Pressure. Its with Counterparts that a new era begins, where synthesizers are massively reduced (and on Vapor Trails entirely eliminated!) to providing a mostly minimal textural role for the songs, arguably on a level that is even more limited than the albums that preceded Signals. Anyway, I obviously have a bit to say about this lol. My theory is that many (not all) of the fans who bemoan the "synth period" are actually not objecting to the presence of the synths, but the TYPE of synthesizers that are being used (the digital synths of the mid to late 80s, which have a sound that is very different from the older analog synths of the 70s/early 80s).
    • Like 2
  2. It ended too soon.

     

    It did indeed. I'm totally onboard with Rush continually updating their sound, but synthesizers should always have a place-not too overpowering, but not too minimal either (Grace Under Pressure had a good balance between the guitars and synths).

  3. 1) Moving Pictures (I don't listen to it much, but there's no way I can justify putting it any lower)

    2) Signals

    3) Grace Under Pressure

    4) Power Windows

    5) Permanent Waves

    6) Hemispheres

    7) Hold Your Fire

    8) Presto (the most underrated of their entire catalogue! :codger:)

    9) A Farewell to Kings

    10) Counterparts

    11) Roll The Bones

    12) Clockwork Angels

    13) Fly By Night (IMHO, this is their de facto debut)

    14) 2112 (yeah, sorry but....its very overrated :finbar: )

    15) Test for Echo

    16) Snakes and Arrows

    17) Vapor Trails (a handful of good songs ruined by audio compression and lame production decisions, such as no keyboards and no guitar solos (!))

    18) Caress of Steel

    19) Rush

  4. Xanadu

    The Trees

    Spirit of Radio

    Natural Science

    Limelight

    YYZ

    Subdivisions

    Afterimage

    Between the Wheels

    Marathon

    Manhattan Project

    Emotion Detector

    Force Ten

    Time Stand Still

    Mission

    Turn the Page

    The Pass

    The Analog Kid

    The Weapon

    The Enemy Within

  5. I'm not sure what qualifies as "synth-based," but 2112 was the first album to feature a synthesizer (the intro to the title track is played on an ARP Odyssey). Also, starting with A Farewell to Kings (and lasting for most of the remainder of their career) the Moog Taurus bass pedals were used extensively, both in studio and live. This pedal-based synthesizer was used not only for its native sounds but most significantly as an interface to play the key-based synths (like the Minimoog and Oberheim).
  6. It ended with Counterparts, where the synths were severely minimized compared to previous releases. Power Windows and Hold Your Fire were the apex of the synth period, while Presto and Roll The Bones were transitional albums.
    • Like 1
  7. Quite simply, its because of the rap section. I admit, it is cringeworthy. It's unfortunate too, because otherwise its a very solid track, one of the best on the album. I think the song would have been much stronger without the rap section; instead, replace it with some funky instrumental interaction among Geddy, Alex and Neil.
  8. It was also my first Rush album and to this day I still love it, easily in my top 10 fav Rush releases. I could never understand the hate for this one. The musicianship is top notch, the lyrics are some of Peart's all time best, and there is an excellent balance between the guitars and synths (something that was a bit lacking with the previous two releases). And as far as the production is concerned, I'll take the "thin" sound of Presto over the unbearable audio compression of Vapor Trails any day. :madra:
    • Like 1
  9. Its nowhere even close to bad, and Rush DOES have a couple of really bad albums. The lyrics are among Neil's all time best, and the musicianship is just outrageous. I can somewhat sympathize with those who don't like the production values of this period, and "Tai Shan" does admittedly have its cringeworthy moments. Other than that, it is an extremely good album, easily in my top 10 favorite Rush releases.
    • Like 3
  10. Imo most 70's n 2000's Rush is rubbish to me (Minus some of Hemispheres, some of 2112, all of AFTK, n some of CA)

     

    Hard Rock is not really my thing anymore n it just sounds bleh in my ears no offense.

     

    I more or less agree. The first 4 albums and the last 4 albums just don't do it for me. On the other hand, everything they released from 1980-89 is superb.

    As a recording unit, they only existed from 1976 to 1993.

    For me.

     

    Sounds about right. I do also enjoy listening to AFTK and Hemispheres. On the other hand, RTB is a bit too hit and miss. Counterparts is only a little better in the writing, but the production is unquestionably fantastic.

×
×
  • Create New...