MeanMeanPride Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I for one would be thrilled to pieces if they announced a 2nd leg. I highly, highly doubt this will happen though. Maybe some more studio work? Who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 We should all get together to hug and bop our botties to the beat of Tai Shan. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 (edited) Some good ideas here. 1) Do you think Rush will tour again? 2) When do you think Rush's next album will be out? 3) Just for fun, let's do a setlist for the next tour. 4) What do you think the best R40 show was? Repeat one through four over and over. For variation, improvise. You are welcome. Edited August 1, 2015 by Lorraine 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Analog Grownup Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I'll live :) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pound of Obscure Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 (edited) Do what we've always done. There is life here even when they're not touring, believe it or not. Perhaps binge watching Trek or FireflyMaybe go to another web forum and speculate aboot that Battlestar Galactica movie "coming soon"?It's coming any day now!!!! That place has already been given an enema. I think it needs a Hog Report. Edited August 1, 2015 by Pound of Obscure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pound of Obscure Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I'll live :) Nonsense. You will wither on the vine like the rest of us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnRogers Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I'm currently searching for Queensrÿche forums to hang out at but those people have issues as well. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I'm currently searching for Queensrÿche forums to hang out at but those people have issues as well. I think you ought to go to Counterparts. They smoke cigars and drink Scotch over there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 Wait............and goof around here. Answer mounds of when will Rush be back threads. cause ya know they're coming. lol. MickWe could make a poll!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 We can start predictng the set list for the next limited tour. That would be fun Only if it includes lots of never-played "vault" tracks. :eyeroll: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 S. O. C. N. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Entre_Perpetuo Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 "What we always do. Keep playin' till the cops get here." 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here. More dead horses to be beaten. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.It's settled. There's a high degree of correlation between those who believe it's an 80s album with the belief that the moon landing was faked and that Tom Brady is telling the truth. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I have sort of an answer to that Permanent Waves' argument straight from the horse's mouth. This is what Ray said about the reason why albums are released when they are: Hypothetically, I would put a record out in January because a chart position was important, and the tour wasn’t starting until April. They (the U.S. label) would insist that they wanted it in the 4th quarter (of the past year) because that’s the biggest quarter (of music sales). I would say. “That’s great. The record will be over in four weeks.” And they thought, “It makes our year, our quarter, and it is probably going to sell as much in that quarter as it is going to sell anyway” blah blah blah. I’m like “no.” To this day, I still try to build this band. If I wanted to go out January or February, and do a release to coincide with the tour so that the record would be in the stores for 6 months rather than 6 weeks, I didn’t care ultimately if it sold the same amount. I ultimately cared that it built the band. Keep in mind, at every American label we were at, we ended up with people who hadn’t signed us. Who didn’t care about us. Who didn't love us. Yet, in Canada we have had the consistency of doing things on our own, and with a label (Anthem Records, distributed by Universal Music Canada) which was right for the band, and not what was right for the label. Now more than ever I consider it a seventies' album released when it was simply for strategy. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Barchetta Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 Do what we've always done. There is life here even when they're not touring, believe it or not. Perhaps binge watching Trek or FireflyMaybe go to another web forum and speculate aboot that Battlestar Galactica movie "coming soon"?It's coming any day now!!!! That place has already been given an enema. I think it needs a Hog Report.For crying out loud, man! At least you've won a SuperBowl...Sorry, as a Falcons' fan that GIF was bugging me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.It's settled. There's a high degree of correlation between those who believe it's an 80s album with the belief that the moon landing was faked and that Tom Brady is telling the truth.So you're saying it's probably an 80's album? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I have sort of an answer to that Permanent Waves' argument straight from the horse's mouth. This is what Ray said about the reason why albums are released when they are: Hypothetically, I would put a record out in January because a chart position was important, and the tour wasn’t starting until April. They (the U.S. label) would insist that they wanted it in the 4th quarter (of the past year) because that’s the biggest quarter (of music sales). I would say. “That’s great. The record will be over in four weeks.” And they thought, “It makes our year, our quarter, and it is probably going to sell as much in that quarter as it is going to sell anyway” blah blah blah. I’m like “no.” To this day, I still try to build this band. If I wanted to go out January or February, and do a release to coincide with the tour so that the record would be in the stores for 6 months rather than 6 weeks, I didn’t care ultimately if it sold the same amount. I ultimately cared that it built the band. Keep in mind, at every American label we were at, we ended up with people who hadn’t signed us. Who didn’t care about us. Who didn't love us. Yet, in Canada we have had the consistency of doing things on our own, and with a label (Anthem Records, distributed by Universal Music Canada) which was right for the band, and not what was right for the label. Now more than ever I consider it a seventies' album released when it was simply for strategy.Settled science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Barchetta Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 IMO...Permanent Waves was the best, whatever decade you consider it! And no, I have no idea why this is italicized. I've had a drink or five. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.As long as the PeWaves 70's or 80's album question remains unsettled, we have plenty of work to do here.It's settled. There's a high degree of correlation between those who believe it's an 80s album with the belief that the moon landing was faked and that Tom Brady is telling the truth.So you're saying it's probably an 80's album?It's a 80s album in the same way the moon landing was faked, yes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I have sort of an answer to that Permanent Waves' argument straight from the horse's mouth. This is what Ray said about the reason why albums are released when they are: Hypothetically, I would put a record out in January because a chart position was important, and the tour wasn’t starting until April. They (the U.S. label) would insist that they wanted it in the 4th quarter (of the past year) because that’s the biggest quarter (of music sales). I would say. “That’s great. The record will be over in four weeks.” And they thought, “It makes our year, our quarter, and it is probably going to sell as much in that quarter as it is going to sell anyway” blah blah blah. I’m like “no.” To this day, I still try to build this band. If I wanted to go out January or February, and do a release to coincide with the tour so that the record would be in the stores for 6 months rather than 6 weeks, I didn’t care ultimately if it sold the same amount. I ultimately cared that it built the band. Keep in mind, at every American label we were at, we ended up with people who hadn’t signed us. Who didn’t care about us. Who didn't love us. Yet, in Canada we have had the consistency of doing things on our own, and with a label (Anthem Records, distributed by Universal Music Canada) which was right for the band, and not what was right for the label. Now more than ever I consider it a seventies' album released when it was simply for strategy. Everything revolves around bringing in the bucks. It's a business after all. Marketing is everything. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Barchetta Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 It was released in 1980...hence an '80's album. Jeez.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorraine Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 I have sort of an answer to that Permanent Waves' argument straight from the horse's mouth. This is what Ray said about the reason why albums are released when they are: Hypothetically, I would put a record out in January because a chart position was important, and the tour wasn’t starting until April. They (the U.S. label) would insist that they wanted it in the 4th quarter (of the past year) because that’s the biggest quarter (of music sales). I would say. “That’s great. The record will be over in four weeks.” And they thought, “It makes our year, our quarter, and it is probably going to sell as much in that quarter as it is going to sell anyway” blah blah blah. I’m like “no.” To this day, I still try to build this band. If I wanted to go out January or February, and do a release to coincide with the tour so that the record would be in the stores for 6 months rather than 6 weeks, I didn’t care ultimately if it sold the same amount. I ultimately cared that it built the band. Keep in mind, at every American label we were at, we ended up with people who hadn’t signed us. Who didn’t care about us. Who didn't love us. Yet, in Canada we have had the consistency of doing things on our own, and with a label (Anthem Records, distributed by Universal Music Canada) which was right for the band, and not what was right for the label. Now more than ever I consider it a seventies' album released when it was simply for strategy. Everything revolves around bringing in the bucks. It's a business after all. Marketing is everything. Isn't it true? Money is the bottom line for many. I liked it better before I knew how much of a racket the music industry really is. It's just a big business and the band is the corporation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfrushfan0122 Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 Let's ask the magic conch? Oh Magic Conch, now that Rush has finished their R40 Tour, will they ever tour again?http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k523/safeinatree/tumblr_inline_ml4uzl8dlB1qz4rgp_zps16518246.gif Is this date the end of RUsh as we know it?http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ujk49rwd1qkwym7.gif What shall we do while we wait?http://memecrunch.com/meme/CUGT/nothing/image.png The conch has spoken!http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/2084694/magic-conch-o.gif http://i.imgur.com/XawsZ1o.png?1 Is there anyway to like this post more than once???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now