Powderfinger Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Rolling Stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RushFansInCentralTexas Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 TMZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReflectedLight Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 two rags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaldad Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Can we Please end this shit already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skullchrist Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (metaldad @ Mar 8 2012, 03:46 PM) Can we Please end this shit already No. Â Sorry, couldn't resist. Edited March 8, 2012 by skullchrist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaldad Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 QUOTE (skullchrist @ Mar 8 2012, 03:54 PM) QUOTE (metaldad @ Mar 8 2012, 03:46 PM) Can we Please end this shit already No. Â Sorry, couldn't resist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sullysue Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 QUOTE (metaldad @ Mar 8 2012, 02:46 PM) Can we Please end this shit already I guess I don't really need to click on those links then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchance to Dream Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 QUOTE (metaldad @ Mar 8 2012, 01:46 PM) Can we Please end this shit already If you mean shit = Rolling Stone, I wholeheartedly concur. That rag jumped the shark years ago. They've done nothing but bag on Rush for decades. f**k them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Rolling Stone has nothing of value to say. Why read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocketom Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 This is so Sad, a band together for almost 40 years and this is how they get in the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto-a RUSH fan! Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 If this is true, I think we should make a rush limbaugh video, using clips of his show, take use them however we please, even dub words into his fat mouth. I don't understand how you can't tell a show not to use YOUR music as a bumper. That makes no sense. I'm sure legally it can be argued, but it just doesn't pass the common sense test for me. If I make music, and you start using it on your program, I should be able to tell you to stop. I don't get that at all. And I concur...RS is trash, the same trash that the RRHOF is made up of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReflectedLight Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 QUOTE (circumstantial tree @ Mar 8 2012, 05:34 PM) Rolling Stone has nothing of value to say. Why read it? instead of reading it, wipe with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony R Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 (edited) The Rolling Stone article does not rip on Rush in any way. It's a pretty neutral piece. Edited March 9, 2012 by Tony R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RushFanForever Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 (edited) Tom Morello is stepping up about this now according to here. Edited March 9, 2012 by RushFanForever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (RushFanForever @ Mar 9 2012, 12:47 PM) Tom Morello is stepping up about this now according to here. I don't name call, for the most part, but Tom Morello is an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 Rush Limbaugh is requesting that Rush, the band, change its name to something so that people will not connect him in anyway to the band that asked him to remove their music from his show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tangy Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (RushFanForever @ Mar 9 2012, 12:47 PM) Tom Morello is stepping up about this now according to here. amazing. i can see RL playing rush, gabriel and the fabulous thunder birds but RATM? whats next, Public Enemy?  heres a RATM song suggestion for RL that his audience will surely love- Edited March 9, 2012 by tangy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merely Space Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (ReflectedLight @ Mar 8 2012, 06:58 PM) QUOTE (circumstantial tree @ Mar 8 2012, 05:34 PM) Rolling Stone has nothing of value to say. Why read it? instead of reading it, wipe with it. Tried it. Glossy pages make this a serious mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lerxt1990 Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (circumstantial tree @ Mar 9 2012, 02:22 PM) Rush Limbaugh is requesting that Rush, the band, change its name to something so that people will not connect him in anyway to the band that asked him to remove their music from his show. Rush has a Limbo. The other Rush has a Limbaugh.  http://etixonline.com/wp-content/uploads/BigTimeRush.jpg When will we bring THIS Rush into the fold!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lerxt1990 Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (Tony R @ Mar 9 2012, 12:37 PM) The Rolling Stone article does not rip on Rush in any way. It's a pretty neutral piece. I agree. It also answered a question Ive been asking - which is what the financial arrangement radio stations have with the publishers/copyrighters for themusic, and it describes it here. They get a royalty for the pubic play, so the radio stations can play it. The article makes it sound like the artist can object, but doesnt have a leg to stand on.    Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rushgoober Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (Merely Space @ Mar 9 2012, 02:48 PM) QUOTE (ReflectedLight @ Mar 8 2012, 06:58 PM) QUOTE (circumstantial tree @ Mar 8 2012, 05:34 PM) Rolling Stone has nothing of value to say. Why read it? instead of reading it, wipe with it. Tried it. Glossy pages make this a serious mistake. Chafing = Bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchance to Dream Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Mar 9 2012, 03:02 PM) QUOTE (Tony R @ Mar 9 2012, 12:37 PM) The Rolling Stone article does not rip on Rush in any way. It's a pretty neutral piece. I agree. It also answered a question Ive been asking - which is what the financial arrangement radio stations have with the publishers/copyrighters for themusic, and it describes it here. They get a royalty for the pubic play, so the radio stations can play it. The article makes it sound like the artist can object, but doesnt have a leg to stand on. As far as the artist not having a leg to stand on: Chrissie Hynde from the Pretenders tried to do the same thing. Apparently Rush told her to pound sand because he uses "Ohio" as his intro music to this day. I haven't listened to Rush Limbaugh in several days, so I don't know if he quit using Spirit of Radio as bumper music or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
An Enemy Without Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Mar 9 2012, 04:02 PM) They get a royalty for the pubic play, so the radio stations can play it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lerxt1990 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 QUOTE (An Enemy Without @ Mar 9 2012, 08:25 PM) QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Mar 9 2012, 04:02 PM) They get a royalty for the pubic play, so the radio stations can play it. What, its what the article says. Can they opt out of that arrangement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
An Enemy Without Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Mar 9 2012, 07:28 PM) QUOTE (An Enemy Without @ Mar 9 2012, 08:25 PM) QUOTE (lerxt1990 @ Mar 9 2012, 04:02 PM) They get a royalty for the pubic play, so the radio stations can play it. What, its what the article says. Can they opt out of that arrangement? Read what you said again... Veeeery carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now