Tom Sawyer Posted November 16, 2009 Share Posted November 16, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owl Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 Not the biggest Roland Emmerich fan, but I will probably check this out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushman14 Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 looks like good destructo porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
workingcinderellaman Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
workingcinderellaman Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 QUOTE (Rushman14 @ Nov 17 2009, 02:57 PM) looks like good destructo porn. Exacty what I thought. But entertaining nonethess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 QUOTE (workingcinderellaman @ Nov 17 2009, 04:29 PM) QUOTE (Rushman14 @ Nov 17 2009, 02:57 PM) looks like good destructo porn. Exacty what I thought. But entertaining nonethess. Roger Ebert's attitude was, this movie doesn't aspire to be anything more than an end-of-the-world disaster flick where lots of famous landmarks get destroyed, and that it used good special effects to achieve that goal, and based on that gave it a favorable review. Seems like a fair way of looking at it. Emmerich is still a hack, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soni Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 Should I expect the Chtullu to show up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarkus406 Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 Oh boy I can't wait for 2012...the mass hysteria, the widespread panic...its like Y2K all over again! Except a lot more ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlaze Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Nov 18 2009, 06:36 AM) QUOTE (workingcinderellaman @ Nov 17 2009, 04:29 PM) QUOTE (Rushman14 @ Nov 17 2009, 02:57 PM) looks like good destructo porn. Exacty what I thought. But entertaining nonethess. Roger Ebert's attitude was, this movie doesn't aspire to be anything more than an end-of-the-world disaster flick where lots of famous landmarks get destroyed, and that it used good special effects to achieve that goal, and based on that gave it a favorable review. Seems like a fair way of looking at it. Emmerich is still a hack, though. screw ebert. sounds like a stupid way to judge a movie. if someone's got the budget & a great technical staff then it's going to get a favorable review?! what garbage! hack is the right word for emmerich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-0-0-1-0-0-1 Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 QUOTE (JohnnyBlaze @ Nov 19 2009, 02:13 AM) QUOTE (1-0-0-1-0-0-1 @ Nov 18 2009, 06:36 AM) QUOTE (workingcinderellaman @ Nov 17 2009, 04:29 PM) QUOTE (Rushman14 @ Nov 17 2009, 02:57 PM) looks like good destructo porn. Exacty what I thought. But entertaining nonethess. Roger Ebert's attitude was, this movie doesn't aspire to be anything more than an end-of-the-world disaster flick where lots of famous landmarks get destroyed, and that it used good special effects to achieve that goal, and based on that gave it a favorable review. Seems like a fair way of looking at it. Emmerich is still a hack, though. screw ebert. sounds like a stupid way to judge a movie. if someone's got the budget & a great technical staff then it's going to get a favorable review?! what garbage! hack is the right word for emmerich. He meant it more like it was eye candy done right. As opposed to, say, the last "Transformers" movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lerxster Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owl Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 05:34 AM) http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sark Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 03:34 AM) http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg Classic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Thanks, I'm going to use that as desktop wallpaper. However, if someone has a larger image that would be even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mara Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 QUOTE (Sark @ Nov 19 2009, 12:52 PM) QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 03:34 AM) http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg Classic! Oh that is AWESOME! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tHobbs Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Its a mediocre movie, but a great disaster movie...if that makes any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Cocky Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 06:34 AM) http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg YES!!!! Edited November 20, 2009 by Rush Cocky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeOhBe Bob Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 07:34 AM)http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg I just opened the dictionary and looked up the word Awesome, and saw this picture there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owl Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Saw the flick today..... Meh......It wasn't "bad", but other than the visuals, it really was not "good" either. A bit too long as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sawyer Posted November 23, 2009 Author Share Posted November 23, 2009 QUOTE (The Owl @ Nov 22 2009, 11:54 PM) Saw the flick today..... Meh......It wasn't "bad", but other than the visuals, it really was not "good" either. A bit too long as well. I didn't say it was great, just good. I like CGI films like this though, wish they made more!! Take familiar things you are used to seeing, twist them, crash them, destroy them and flood them!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owl Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 QUOTE (Tom Sawyer @ Nov 23 2009, 02:05 PM) QUOTE (The Owl @ Nov 22 2009, 11:54 PM) Saw the flick today..... Meh......It wasn't "bad", but other than the visuals, it really was not "good" either. A bit too long as well. I didn't say it was great, just good. I like CGI films like this though, wish they made more!! Take familiar things you are used to seeing, twist them, crash them, destroy them and flood them!! I did not dislike it..... And face it, it is orders of magnitude better than anything Michael Bay has put out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL2112 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 QUOTE (Lerxster @ Nov 19 2009, 03:34 AM) http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii282/Lerxster/2112.jpg I nominate this as "Most Awesome Post of the Year"!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnaWanna Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Just rented this, gonna watch it after the hockey game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sawyer Posted March 5, 2010 Author Share Posted March 5, 2010 QUOTE (DonnaWanna @ Mar 2 2010, 10:25 PM) Just rented this, gonna watch it after the hockey game got the Bluray on Tues. my son and I watched it twice already this week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Show Don't Tell Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 QUOTE (The Owl @ Nov 23 2009, 01:54 AM)Saw the flick today..... Meh......It wasn't "bad", but other than the visuals, it really was not "good" either. A bit too long as well. I agree. I just rented the DVD last night and watched it, and that's pretty much how I felt about it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now