Jump to content

Presto: Rush's most awkward era


fraroc
 Share

Recommended Posts

When you see how Rush evolved musically and visually througout the 70s into the 80s and then the 90s, I think that the most awkward era out of all of them would be the Presto era. The reason being was that Rush was in a transitory state, the 80s had come to a close and the 90s had come, the sound on Presto the album is reminiscent of Hold Your Fire and a bit of Power Windows, but with the bass guitar being brought back into the forefront and the keyboards becoming more background in nature, with Ged opting to use backing tracks for keyboard parts on Presto as opposed to playing them (Of course, with the exception of Show Don't Tell). Their live show and image was also in an awkward in-between state. Alex still had his 80s hairstyle, Geddy still had a ponytail,but didn't perm the top of his hair anymore and wore glasses after years of contacts, Ged reduced his keyboards from four to two live, and Neil still played double bass. So while Rush was slowly transforming their live show into something more modern and scaled back, some vintage elements still remained.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was clear that they were heading in another direction... I remember what Rupert Hine said about them being a "power trio" but being awash in keyboards... and yet the records he made with them aren't terribly "powerful"... nuanced, classy, but not powerful!

 

 

Definitely a transitional phase.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Transitory yes.

 

Awkward maybe.

 

Great yes.

 

Show Don't Tell, Chain Lightning, Available Light. Great stuff. More scaled back than PoW and HYF, but just as tight and catchy.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Presto! Just a couple of ho-hum songs, but I do love the sound of it, thin as it is...Rupert Hine’s production is just a product of that particular era.

 

I ❤️ the piccolo snare, which is also a hallmark of that era- just Presto and Roll the Bones, and then gone for good.

 

Great material, and if you can’t separate it from the band they were ten years prior, that’s on you. No band stays the same over that period of time.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is only one Rush album I feel is slightly awkward...and that is Counterparts. Presto is a really good album.

 

Counterparts is awkward....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.

 

and.......unpopular opinion. but Neil's best drumming. and the last time he'd do anything that different and interesting.

 

Mick

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.

 

and.......unpopular opinion. but Neil's best drumming. and the last time he'd do anything that different and interesting.

 

Mick

 

Yes, before that ballet slipper man Freddie got hold of him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.

 

and.......unpopular opinion. but Neil's best drumming. and the last time he'd do anything that different and interesting.

 

Mick

 

Hmm, I’ll call that an interesting opinion- his drumming on the more concise songs (verse/chorus/bridge/verse/chorus) is generally thought of as simpler, but especially on the stretch from Power Windows through Roll the Bones, he was doing some very intricate and technically (and deceptively) difficult things.

 

As far as Presto being the last time he would do anything as inventive or interesting, I don’t think I agree with that. But right on, Mick.

 

Josh

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presto has some really good songs on it.

 

No Rush album is a complete failure.

 

"Presto" is a masterpiece. Every song is great. Neil's drumming is off the charts. A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.

 

and.......unpopular opinion. but Neil's best drumming. and the last time he'd do anything that different and interesting.

 

Mick

 

Yes, before that ballet slipper man Freddie got hold of him.

 

Yup i think ol Fred dumbed his drumming down.

 

but i'm not a musician, lol

 

Mick

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awkward?

 

depends are how you yourself define that

 

Great? Fukk yea. one of my all time fav rush albums.

 

Mick

Tight arrangements, great vocals, mostly solid lyrics, and more Alex up front. I love it.

 

and.......unpopular opinion. but Neil's best drumming. and the last time he'd do anything that different and interesting.

 

Mick

 

Yes, before that ballet slipper man Freddie got hold of him.

 

Yup i think ol Fred dumbed his drumming down.

 

but i'm not a musician, lol

 

Mick

I always thought Neil drummed better before Freddie got a hold of him but I'm not a musician either.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t say it’s a matter of better or worse, but Freddie definitely refined his drumming, introduced some different technique, and sent it in a direction that it had not gone before.

 

And I am a musician. But I don’t think that necessarily qualifies my opinion any more than a non-musician.

Edited by Blue J
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t say it’s a matter of better or worse, but Freddie definitely refined his drumming, introduced some different technique, and sent it in a direction that it had not gone before.

 

And I am a musician. But I don’t think that necessarily qualifies my opinion any more than a non-musician.

 

i'm just going by what sounds good, lol

 

Mick

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Freddie Gruber was brought up here, I thought I'd add my thoughts. I also think Freddie softened Neil's drumming. I'm certainly no musician, so I can only go by what I hear and what I feel. And what the heck, what I think.

 

Neil seemed more powerful behind the drums prior to Freddie. I also wonder if the change in technique could possibly have hurt Neil physically. Nope, I certainly don't have any proof to offer. All I have is wonder. Neil would have had a certain physical way of drumming since the first day he picked up a drumstick and struck it down. His arms, hands, shoulders, muscles (etc.) would have "acclimated" (if that's the right word) to that way of drumming for decades.

 

Is it possible that when Freddie re-taught him how to drum, that Neil's muscles and arms and all that, would have been like, "What the Hell is this sudden change, Neil?" Could that change have really affected him? Is it possible that if Neil hadn't changed his techniques that he may not have suffered such physical pain and had to retire at such a relatively young age? (I still can't imagine what it would be like to have had such incredible talent and love for drumming and then having to just give it all up due to the physical challenge.)

 

Perhaps some drummers on here would have some personal input on that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Freddie Gruber was brought up here, I thought I'd add my thoughts. I also think Freddie softened Neil's drumming. I'm certainly no musician, so I can only go by what I hear and what I feel. And what the heck, what I think.

 

Neil seemed more powerful behind the drums prior to Freddie. I also wonder if the change in technique could possibly have hurt Neil physically. Nope, I certainly don't have any proof to offer. All I have is wonder. Neil would have had a certain physical way of drumming since the first day he picked up a drumstick and struck it down. His arms, hands, shoulders, muscles (etc.) would have "acclimated" (if that's the right word) to that way of drumming for decades.

 

Is it possible that when Freddie re-taught him how to drum, that Neil's muscles and arms and all that, would have been like, "What the Hell is this sudden change, Neil?" Could that change have really affected him? Is it possible that if Neil hadn't changed his techniques that he may not have suffered such physical pain and had to retire at such a relatively young age? (I still can't imagine what it would be like to have had such incredible talent and love for drumming and then having to just give it all up due to the physical challenge.)

 

Perhaps some drummers on here would have some personal input on that.

I'd go the other way and say that adopting Freddie's ideas probably prolonged Neil's career. Neil's original hyper-powerful approach of hitting through the drum takes a heavy toll compared to the more finesse-based Gruber approach. I'd guess the physical damage was done early on via Neil's natural pounding style, not later during the jazzy years.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Freddie Gruber was brought up here, I thought I'd add my thoughts. I also think Freddie softened Neil's drumming. I'm certainly no musician, so I can only go by what I hear and what I feel. And what the heck, what I think.

 

Neil seemed more powerful behind the drums prior to Freddie. I also wonder if the change in technique could possibly have hurt Neil physically. Nope, I certainly don't have any proof to offer. All I have is wonder. Neil would have had a certain physical way of drumming since the first day he picked up a drumstick and struck it down. His arms, hands, shoulders, muscles (etc.) would have "acclimated" (if that's the right word) to that way of drumming for decades.

 

Is it possible that when Freddie re-taught him how to drum, that Neil's muscles and arms and all that, would have been like, "What the Hell is this sudden change, Neil?" Could that change have really affected him? Is it possible that if Neil hadn't changed his techniques that he may not have suffered such physical pain and had to retire at such a relatively young age? (I still can't imagine what it would be like to have had such incredible talent and love for drumming and then having to just give it all up due to the physical challenge.)

 

Perhaps some drummers on here would have some personal input on that.

I'd go the other way and say that adopting Freddie's ideas probably prolonged Neil's career. Neil's original hyper-powerful approach of hitting through the drum takes a heavy toll compared to the more finesse-based Gruber approach. I'd guess the physical damage was done early on via Neil's natural pounding style, not later during the jazzy years.

 

Yes - this is what I was trying to type. You said it perfectly.

 

I think he went a little too crazy with the Freddie influence on T4E - but then again he seemed inspired- and that’s important in making vital rock music. By VT I think he was playing very very well.

 

I love old Peart - but live, in the 70s and early 80s, he could be pretty erratic at odd moments - listen to the tempos circa 83/84 from their live shows. Wow!

 

NP is on fire on Presto - and his drums have that super-tight Copeland sound to them. His drumming on Scars is inspired (Rick Allen maybe?) and groundbreaking.

 

Aside from their last tour, in which I thought Peart was either WAY done with Rush, or in physical pain, I found Peart to be pretty electrifying. Clockwork Angels especially.

 

My all time favorite Neil was during the Roll The Bones era. His playing was just perfect on that tour.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think NP was searching for that Buddy Rich special sauce - to harness serious power without that debilitating physical effort. I think he got there part of the way.

 

I think one guy that has the jazz/Buddy Rich approach is Carl Palmer. He’s 69. Plays all the time.

Edited by chemistry1973
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was recorded without a bass guitar. Bet y'all didn't know that

 

Actually, they forgot to plug Geddy in, so yeah there is bass, technically...but whatever...

 

Available Light and Presto are two of the best songs Rush ever recorded...goose bumps type of stuff... :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...