Snyder80

I liked that they moved on from their older sound; progression is good. Synth era songs to me are definitely the most meaningful and heartfelt.

 

I totally agree.

They would've ended up like Tool. Extraordinary musicianship, great song writing, legions of fans and every single song sounding exactly the same. BORING!

Hahahaha! I love you "fukking" guys!

 

I am insane! But in a good way.

tor

Hey I truly am crazy! Not only do I have some serious Andrew Rush autos on my wall too but I also have the very rare Neil Peart photo of him driving his BMW car! Not motorcycle!

 

I have 3/25! Andrew autographed it in pencil!

 

So yes. I am a RUSHHEAD FOREVER!!!!!!

 

I know have signed on my living room wall:

 

GEDDY

ALEX

NEIL

ANDREW

HUGH

Clockwork Angels author. Not going to lie. Don't really care about that one. It looks nice in green ink though!!!

 

So yes!

 

I am finally alone and single and free!

 

"NO WOMAN NO CRY!"

 

I AM HAPPY!

 

HAPPY THE MAN?

 

No!!!

 

I'm Bob Marley baby!

 

Time for some "EXODUS" bitches.

 

RUSH ON FOREVER!

 

I may never return!

 

I am having too much fun by myself!

 

ROCK AND ROLL!

 

 

METAL!

 

PROG!

 

JAZZ!

 

FUSION!

 

FUNK!

 

PUNK!

 

BLUES!!

 

"Who Needs A Woman" is my new hit single. Look for it on iTunes or at your favorite dinosaur record store.

 

Wow...dude I hope you're doing okay for real. Maybe I'm reading your post a little too literally.

Not to sound so predictable but there really is no other band like Rush. They have covered so many different styles and sounds throughout their career it's impossible to believe that another band has accomplished that kind of sonic range. Even other prog bands I love like Tool or PT, unfortunately most of their offerings sound a lot alike. They find a good formula and they stick with it. Rush, for whatever reason, never did that. For better or worse, based on your own ears, they have never made the same album twice. Hell they often can't even make the same sounding verse twice. Truly a unique and one of a kind act. I'm happy to say I love their music.

That's f***ing awesome!

 

Lucy reminds me of the girl from Permanent Waves! Lol...

How about the "ding"? At 2:29.

 

 

That's a cool moment.

 

It's f***ing scary how amazing of a musician that guy is. He never ceases to blow my mind.

Yes.

 

I go through phases with other bands and some last longer than others. I was in a Porcupine Tree phase for a pretty good while, same thing with Pink Floyd at one point. I tried Dream Theater, Yes, Tool, Genesis and other progressive rock acts. They all have their shining moments for me but only Rush can make me continuously happy over such a long period of time. Just the other day I had my phone on shuffle and it went from Hemispheres to Signals to Vapor Trails right in a row. All different time periods, styles, explorations, sounds, etc. And it was somehow all still magical to me. Love 'em!

I still have to admit to being a tad underwhelmed by this show. I don't think they did their career justice, I guess. Any way hearing Animate played at full speed was a highlight for me, as was hearing RTB for the first time since VT tour ( I missed the R30 tour). One Little Victory was a bonus. Highlight of the evening had to be Xanadu in it's entirety with the double necks. I never expected to be so impressed by that as I was, it was like going back in time.

Guess what? It's about 45 million now.

 

I was just gonna say this!

 

Five million albums in ten years is a fairly decent amount, if you ask me. Three decent selling records and tonnes of critical acclaim for a decades old band?

 

Not to be scoffed at!

 

Especially when considering how much music retail has tanked, over those ten years- over the past twenty, really. People just don't buy new music like they used to- not even close, in terms of volume. The interwebs have changed all of that.

 

Half a million albums per year? Yes, that's very good, I think.

 

Your comment about music retail tanking made me a bit sad. I came from the era of record stores and everything on vinyl. Hell, I still remember when cassette tapes were a 10 square foot corner of the record store.

It could never be Rush without Ged or Al, but I do believe they could still be Rush with another drummer. They did it once already, they could do it again. How many people have gone in and out of the Stones, and the Who? Page and Plant have worked together without Bonham. Geddy and Al should move on with someone else if they still want to play IMHO.

 

Geddy and Alex invented a band called Rush...Neil Peart's drumming and lyrics created the nearly half century phenomenon known today as Rush.

 

Without Neil Peart, it's merely a Rush cover band.

Let's see ... 30 years ago ( counting on fingers . . . . )

 

Post 1985

 

No Neil Peart

 

No Presto ... No Roll The Bones ... No Hold Your Fire

 

I think you get what I mean

 

That would mean no "The Pass", no "Bravado" and no "Mission.

 

That would mean things all of sudden suck ass.

I was never very big on this song and it doesn't get any better with age.

Please stay home, Neil. I've been wanting to see a different drummer take your spot in the tours for years.

 

That's not an option. It's a choice of Neil or nothing. Perhaps you'd like to choose nothing, but I see nothing so bad in his performances that makes me even approach this feeling. Only Geddy's voice moves the needle for me, and even that isn't a close call for me.

 

He's an extremely skilled drummer, but I find his performance lacking.

JARG, what do you mean by you find his performance lacking?

 

IMO, there's more to being a performing musician than just the ability to play your instrument well. You also need to get on with the fascination. You need to put on a performance for your audience that let's them know they're hard-earned patronage is appreciated.

 

Neil fails miserably at this, IMO.

 

You post fails miserably IMO. Neil still plays with more energy than the majority of younger drummers out there. I guess he doesn't smile enough for your tastes or something.

 

You got a little brown on your nose there.

 

I know what I see with my own eyes. Neil was a drumming machine on the CA tour in Indy. Quit comparing 62 year old Neil to 32 year old Neil. He still does a fine job.

Seriously, I've seen every tour from R30 on and Neil beyond impressed me with his performances. Is he the best rock drummer of all-time? I have no idea. I do know he's one of the best rock drummers of all-time. The man is a master.

 

The answer to your question is unquestionably YES. He is the best rock drummer of all-time and most days that isn't even close. There are jazz guys and virtuoso guys who are leagues above. In the theater of rock he is at the head of the pack. People need to remember to look at his entire body of work before saying he isn't. I think lots of other drummers are fabulous, Danny Carey comes to mind, as does Gavin Harrison, Carter Beauford and a number of others. But without Neil's innovations of the 70s, a lot of those guys never would have been inspired to drum the way they do. The same can be said if Neil had never heard Keith Moon or Jon Bonham.

I have yet to read one of his article's where he doesn't mention pouring a measure of Macallan. As in Macallan scotch. Who knows for sure though. I drink a good bit of wine and my nose is just fine.

I used to play guitar and my father played bass in a band for fifteen years. The guy who played lead guitar for that band still plays and has played for 40+ years. Even he will tell you that, yes, a lot of Alex's guitar parts are very technical and very difficult to play CORRECTLY. I capitalize that entire word because so many amateur guitar players like to say everything is easy. One of my former instructor's asked me who some of my favorite guitar players were during one of my first lessons and mentioned a few names, Lifeson being one. His comment was "Some of those we can work on now, others we'll get to in about 5 years."

 

My point there is simply to illustrate that I believe Alex Lifeson to be, hands down, the most underrated guitarist I've ever heard. His ability to create searing leads, crunchy rhythyms, and glimmering layers during a time when he supposedly took a "backseat" to keyboards is astounding. Listen to the solo on Grand Designs and the way he chases Geddy's vocal line into the last chorus and tell me that man isn't a f***ing genius.

 

Geddy and Neil may be the Surf & Turf but Alex is that glass of luscious, velvety red wine that ties the entire meal together.

My ears aren't as good as some. I have never been able to pick out big differences on remasters.

I hear Neil in an interview around the time Rush in Rio came out where he stated at one point in time he thought he was done touring in 1989. I think he's been torn about it for some time now.

 

Honestly, if I were him and had a young daughter, I sure as hell wouldn't be during anymore.

It doesn't matter what Rush thinks about the song. Who buys their stuff? We do.

 

It's time for Jacob's Ladder.

 

It's time for the full length Xanadu.

 

It's time for The Weapon.

 

And I highly doubt that the fans in the audience will sit there like a bunch of zombies.

 

If those three songs you listed were played as the encore I would cry tears of joy

They are only Rush as a dynamic, cohesive and multi-talented GROUP. That being said, Geddy Lee continues to do things that simply amaze me and quite frankly, confuse me. He is so unbelievably talented that it's sometimes difficult to figure out how he does what he does.

Another one could be Witch Hunt...

 

I think Witch Hunt, lyrically, is eons beyond anything Sabbath ever conceived.

Good question. One that I don't find easy to answer. Black Sabbath played a lot of heavy, dark material but most of it was pretty plodding by comparison. I'm stupified by this one...

 

Maybe Working Man???

Test for Echo. Driven is the only track that gets any play.

I don't mean to be a dick but is this a serious question? PeW is in the Top 100 of a list I once saw entitled: 1000 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die. Does that pretty much sum up it's value to the overrall music fan populace? Let alone Rush fans? I mean it's only f***ing Permanent Waves which might be 35 minutes and 35 seconds of the best sounding time in the existence of mankind.

Well, you are being a dick.

And I'm sick and tired of all the complaints about threads that I start. I've noticed too that they all come from members who never start threads.

 

From now on, all of you that complain - start your own.

 

Okay. I think you're misinterpreting my exasperation. It has nothing to do with your thread. It was a very tongue in cheek way of me expressing humorous disbelief in the idea that someone couldn't like that album. I, for one, love your threads. Hence the reason I post on them so often. Sorry.

I don't mean to be a dick but is this a serious question? PeW is in the Top 100 of a list I once saw entitled: 1000 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die. Does that pretty much sum up it's value to the overrall music fan populace? Let alone Rush fans? I mean it's only f***ing Permanent Waves which might be 35 minutes and 35 seconds of the best sounding time in the existence of mankind.

_{A new singer is as likely as them opening with Welcome to the Jungle.}