Jump to content

Harperspace

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Harperspace

  1. It's ok....but not great either. The single is still my favourite track, so I suspect it will be largely consigned to 'the shelf'.
  2. QUOTE (Mr. IsNot @ Jun 19 2012, 02:29 PM) QUOTE (Django @ Jun 19 2012, 12:14 PM) QUOTE (ColdFireYYZ @ Jun 19 2012, 03:03 PM) I'd go see them live if they were playing near me. I'd like to see Procol Harum as well if they are still going to tour this summer. Gary Brooker apparently fell and fractured his skull. They said he's recovering and will be able to tour but I'm wondering if he'll need more time off. And I still don't get why they fired Oliver Wakeman and replaced him with Geoff Downes. Downes was pretty bad live last year. The Oliver Wakeman gimmick didn't work, so Squire tried the "Get Trevor Horn to produce, and Geoff Downes on keyboards so we can finally record all 26 minutes of Fly From Here" gimmick. true ...and some of us liked it. Wakeman Jnr was just a pale copy of his old man...he had to go!
  3. I'm staggered anyone would pick Magnification over Talk & FFH. To me that album summarises all that went badly wrong with Yes post-Talk. Although musically it has some great moments (In the Presence Of...for instance), most of Anderson's lyrics are utter stinkers.
  4. Very sad news - he instructed the best. RIP Freddie.
  5. QUOTE (tick @ Sep 14 2011, 07:14 AM) Dream Theater...its all been done before, Earl. Fixed that for you.
  6. QUOTE (ak2112 @ Aug 24 2011, 10:28 PM) QUOTE (reani14 @ Aug 24 2011, 05:24 PM) who cares. Wow, what a helpful post....not! I dont know about different masterings at GuP forward for the most part, but you can almost never go wrong with the Japanese pressings (either 25.8P or 32.8P catelog numbers) or the original Anthem Canadian CD's. They both usually sound better than their US counterparts, though this is not always true. Many thanks - I'll bear that in mind.
  7. QUOTE (reani14 @ Aug 24 2011, 05:24 PM) who cares. Well obviously I care, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered to ask! Anyway, thanks for your incisive reply.
  8. Thanks for the reply. Of course reverting to vinyl is always an option, but the question was really around the varying CD releases.
  9. Hello! After rediscovering Rush & attending the Time Machine tour, I have found that I am falling in love with the band's music again. I rebought several CDs to plug the gaps in my collection, which was mainly made up of the '97 remasters, along with the odd Mobile Fidelity edition. One of my favourite albums from my youth was/is Grace Under Pressure, so I have listened to it a lot recently. Now the '97 remaster is all well & good. Punchy & loud, but to my untrained ears something just doesn't feel right about it. It's years since I listened to my old vinyl copy, and I don't currently own a turntable. Having read several threads on this very forum concerning differing CD versions, I was wondering if the forumites had reached a consensus on the preferred CD version of Grace to own. A few days ago I picked up one of the original West German CD pressings off Ebay, and that's currently sounding very nice indeed. The 97' remaster may be LOUDER, but as we know loudness shouldn't necessarily be confused with quality. Thoughts?
  10. Several weeks on & this album is still getting contstant rotation from me. I may even pick up a ticket to see them live in November. Even with some of the mixed reports about early gigs with Downes, I'm sure they will be on good form from them. It seems they also rehearsing other tracks from Fly From Here to play at upcoming gigs...
  11. QUOTE (ColdFireYYZ @ Dec 31 2010, 11:53 PM) The Who - New Album TBA (haven't heard any of the post Moon/Entwistle stuff so I'm not sure if I'll get this) Is that still happening then?
  12. As promised, here is my signed copy of Moving Pictures received back from the Manchester UK gig: My signed copy of Moving Pictures
  13. OK, as promised... My Audio Fidelity remaster of 90125 by Yes turned up, so I've had a chance to compare with the other versions I have (original Atco European CD & Rhino remaster). Let me say first of the bat that I'm not a musician or audio expert. I just know what I like! I tend to play most of my CDs on my fairly ancient Cambridge Audio separates system. My 'Go to' version of 90125 has until now been the original Atco CD, and I think that the Rhino remaster just doesn't sound anywhere near as good to me. On the occasions where I've bought newer CD equipment, I have always taken a copy of 90125 with me to use as a test CD. Mainly because it still sounds so fresh, 25 or so years on. The Audio Fidelity edition doesn't sound a million miles away from the Atco CD. However, I do think it is a definite improvement. It's difficult to put my finger on it exactly, but the detail and instruments just sound that bit sharper. Even the voice samples (e.g those on 'It Can Happen') are clearer than I remember them. Nice bottom end too...a very warm sound overall. Of course Horn's exquisite production means that it's really difficult to make this album sound bad, but Steve Hoffman's remaster takes me back to when I first listened to this album on vinyl shortly after it was released. It also makes me realise just how crap the Rhino edition is. Were it not for the inclusion of the bonus tracks & remixes I would throw it away right now! In short, the Audio fidelity wins over the original CD & Rhino for me. A quick word about the packaging. The gold CD comes in a standard jewel cae with the original LP artwork nicely replicated in the booklet, housed in a numbered slip case. All in all, a very nice package. I notice that Audio Fidelity have also released editions of other favourite albums of mine, namely Bad Company's Straight Shooter & Asia's self-titled debut. Based on the strength of this release I will also be picking those up along with the remaster of Roll The Bones. I'm not sure whether this will help anyone make up their mind about purchasing Audio Fidelity's Roll The Bones remaster, or simply muddy the waters even further.
  14. I don't have the jap version but I do have the MFSL edition & the '97 remaster. MFSL beats the '97 remaster hands down, and until I hear the Jap it will remain my go to version. Oh, and with regard to the 'Missing' vocal line on The Weapon (MFSL), it's worth mentioning that the master delivered to MFSL was provided by the band/Anthem. There are other differences too (I'm pretty sure one or two tracks are slightly longer but I'll check). I'm tempted to think that the MFSL edition was wilfully different. Otherwise it would have been withdrawn from sale, right?
  15. Clockwork Angels tour followed by the inevitable R40 tour as a last huzzah. That's my prediction, for what it's worth!
  16. QUOTE (Enemy Within 77 @ Jul 7 2011, 01:39 AM) Hate to rain on the parade here, but no Jon= no Yes. As I asked on another thread - what's he done recently that's been any good? I'll answer that for you - nothing. Yes no longer need him or Wakeman.
  17. QUOTE (D3strukt @ Jul 6 2011, 07:40 AM) Rhino is f***ing horrible. If you are gonna compare, do it to the original master, not the shitty Rhino "gonna brickwall all my shit" remaster. They RUINED Black Box, AND Rules of Hell. Yes, of course I'll compare with the original CD.
  18. Speaking as a longtime Yes fan (28 years+) who has been disappointed with their output post 1994, I am delighted with Fly From Here. To me this is a great, great Yes album. Certainly their strongest since Big Generator, and that's coming from someone who really likes Talk. True this is Trevor Horn's vision of a modern Yes, but it really works for me. Strong harmonies, great playing and a crystal clear make this a pleasure to listen to. Those who miss Anderson's input will simply never get it, which is fair enough. However, to those people I would simply ask 'What's Anderson done recently that's been any good?' His output since Talk & his own Deseo album has been largely dire. He lost his lyrical edge years ago, merely rehashing the same old ideas again & again. For those that crave the 'Old' Yes then there is the Anderson/Wakeman project. Me? I'll be watching the current line-up.
  19. Drama is one of their strongest albums to me. I never understood why it got knocked so much.
  20. Although Roll The Bones is far from being anything like a favourite of mine, I would admit to being a sucker for some of these Audiophile releases. I notice the same company have already released versions of some of my favourite albums, so I took a punt on their version of 90125 by Yes to see what it's like. Quite frankly if they can't do a decent job on that one then I won't be bothering with Roll The Bones or any of their other editions. I'll report back when that CD arrives & I've had a chance to do a comparison with the Rhino 90125 remaster.
  21. A strange choice for sure. I'm sure most of us would have opted for Hemispheres, Farewell or even Grace. I wonder if they have opted for this title now because some of the other albums are due for the so-called 'Deluxe Edition' remaster series that started with Moving Pictures. If those are staggered, then it could be a while before they get around to Roll the Bones?
  22. Whoops! Double post. Sorry everyone.
  23. Another vote here for "The Body Electric". I appreciate that GUP isn't for everyone, coming as it did in the thick of the synth era. However, for me it contains many fine moments. "Afterimage" would always make my top ten list. No, really! Perhaps now that MP has been played in its entirety, the setlist will be mixed up again to freshen things up. At this stage it their careers and with the following they still have, I feel Rush could afford to dig a bit deeper into their repetoire when compiling setlists.
  24. Isn't there a question mark over the High Voltage festival taking place at all next year? Something to with the small matter of the Olympics up the road happening around the same time, I understand. Still if is possible that they might be appearing at other festivals, then that's fantastic news.
  25. QUOTE (Angua @ May 24 2011, 02:44 PM) With the rumour of festival dates in the UK next year... Is that right? Interesting... I wondered whether they might skip Europe for the Clockwork Angels tour, and then return for a possible 'R40' celebration tour. However, I'll be very happy indeed if we see over here again next year.
×
×
  • Create New...