Jump to content

Finally! The Totally Awesome Official Thunderous Thread Of The 2015 Golden State Warriors! 16-0? NBA RECORD! STUDS! CURRY A GOD!


RUSHHEAD666
 Share

Recommended Posts

After narrowly escaping defeat in Phily they go onto to crush the spirit of the Knicks tonight. 10 games in feb only 2 of those at home. Going to be interesting.

 

Well my friend!

 

They are the ROAD WARRIORS!!!!!

 

Signed,

 

Mel Gibson

Edited by RUSHHEAD666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked the schedule. At least they get nine days off in between the All Star Game.

Then again Klay, Curry and Green are in the BIG SHOW BABY!!!!

 

5 Raiders in the Pro Bowl. 3 Warriors in the All Star Game. Life is great in Oakland. Minus my shitty Oakland A's. The Triple A's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Close home game for the Warriors tonight, but they beat OKC and get it done. Warriors, baby!

 

Up by 21 and then a frigging train wreck yet a win. Durant and Westbrook are studs. FAIL.

 

Even when the the Warriors tank they still win. They are beyond beyond.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 W and only 4 L at the all-star break. Warriors, baby!

 

I tried to watch the Raptors game last night. Boring. Warriors are my team all the way.

Like listening to Presto after Hemispheres.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is useless.

 

Warriors keep rolling.

 

No one gives a fukk.

 

I love it.

 

I do. Never seen anything likr it in my life!!!

This season, Steph Curry is shooting 60.4% on shots from 28+ feet. The NBA average from 3 feet or closer is 59.5%.

 

 

:notworthy:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is useless.

 

Warriors keep rolling.

 

No one gives a fukk.

 

I love it.

 

I do. Never seen anything likr it in my life!!!

This season, Steph Curry is shooting 60.4% on shots from 28+ feet. The NBA average from 3 feet or closer is 59.5%.

 

https://twitter.com/...420136644169729

 

:notworthy:

So what you're saying is that rarely contested shots go in at a higher rates than those which are usually highly contested? Why was 28 feet chosen for this comparison? Is there a line there that would make it more significant to hit from there?

 

This is not to say that Curry is not a great shooter; in fact, cherry picked stats like this aren't necessary. There's not even any context in terms of numbers of shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you guys watch the Kevin Hart D. Green three point shootout? Classic!!! Hart looked really good!

I actually did see that. Isn't Hart like 5'3"? If so, just getting it to the rim is an accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you guys watch the Kevin Hart D. Green three point shootout? Classic!!! Hart looked really good!

I actually did see that. Isn't Hart like 5'3"? If so, just getting it to the rim is an accomplishment.

 

Yes!! Hart is very short! He was nailing those threes!!! Very impressive.

 

Curry was HOT again tonight. A close half court shot with 2.6 seconds left. Amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is useless.

 

Warriors keep rolling.

 

No one gives a fukk.

 

I love it.

 

I do. Never seen anything likr it in my life!!!

This season, Steph Curry is shooting 60.4% on shots from 28+ feet. The NBA average from 3 feet or closer is 59.5%.

 

https://twitter.com/...420136644169729

 

:notworthy:

So what you're saying is that rarely contested shots go in at a higher rates than those which are usually highly contested? Why was 28 feet chosen for this comparison?

Because it's far, numbnuts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is useless.

 

Warriors keep rolling.

 

No one gives a fukk.

 

I love it.

 

I do. Never seen anything likr it in my life!!!

This season, Steph Curry is shooting 60.4% on shots from 28+ feet. The NBA average from 3 feet or closer is 59.5%.

 

https://twitter.com/...420136644169729

 

:notworthy:

So what you're saying is that rarely contested shots go in at a higher rates than those which are usually highly contested? Why was 28 feet chosen for this comparison?

Because it's far, numbnuts.

As is 26, 30, or 35. Yet they weren't chosen. Wonder why.

 

Sounds like the kind of stuff you'd see from an advocate of increasing the minimum wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...