Principled Man Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 (edited) http://deadline.com/...mer-1201333753/ Lin's filmography: Shopping For Fangs (1997)Interactions (2000)Crossover (2000)Better Luck Tomorrow (2002)Spotlighting (2005)Annapolis (2006)The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006)Finishing The Game (2007)La Revolución de Iguodala! (2007)Fast & Furious (2009)Community (2010) (TV)Fast Five (2011)Fast & Furious 6 (2013)The Bourne Betrayal (2015)Star Trek 3 (2016) Edited December 23, 2014 by Principled Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 Why him? Nothing on that list moves me beyond a forced bowel movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 The Fast & Furious franchise is popular and profitable. Hopefully, that success will translate to the Star Trek franchise. Lord knows they need it after the dreadful and misguided Star Trek Into Darkness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segue Myles Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 I LOVE INTO DARKNESS! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 I LOVE INTO DARKNESS!I know a lot of people who like it and that's fine. Personally, I find it a incoherent and unfocused mess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 I LOVE INTO DARKNESS!I know a lot of people who like it and that's fine. Personally, I find it a incoherent and unfocused mess. The only interesting part was the first five minutes. After that it was a bit of a snooze fest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 Star Trek Into Darkness was a million steps back after Star Trek. Hopefully, the new director will capture the spirit of Star Trek and update it for current audiences. My fingers are crossed... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babycat Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 I only recognise the Fast & Furious movies, but I have never heard of the director. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleMoon Posted December 23, 2014 Share Posted December 23, 2014 Star Trek Into Darkness was a million steps back after Star Trek. Hopefully, the new director will capture the spirit of Star Trek and update it for current audiences. My fingers are crossed... I agree completely. Here's hoping. They need to work more on the script rather than just action scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I liked the 2 JJ Trek movies, I also get why long time Trek fans may have a problem with them (especially the last one) ... but Trek movie history has been spotty and best and this has put some life into the franchise, which is much better on TV than the big screen. I really know nothing about this guy, I guess we will see. Hopefully he keeps up at least the good box office and someone picks up a new TV series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del_Duio Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I LOVE INTO DARKNESS! Same here. It would have been better if they left him as "John Harrison" or whatever and not made him Khan though.I have hopes that ST3 takes the skirmish bewtween the Federation and Klingons on.... "CHRONOS" (Yes, that's how they spell it nowadays I guess) and runs with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del_Duio Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Star Trek Into Darkness was a million steps back after Star Trek. Hopefully, the new director will capture the spirit of Star Trek and update it for current audiences. My fingers are crossed... Enjoyable but not as good as ST11, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I LOVE INTO DARKNESS! Same here. It would have been better if they left him as "John Harrison" or whatever and not made him Khan though.I have hopes that ST3 takes the skirmish bewtween the Federation and Klingons on.... "CHRONOS" (Yes, that's how they spell it nowadays I guess) and runs with it.There was no reason for Kahn to be in the movie. The fact he was Kahn added nothing to the plot. Also, the character resembled nothing of the Kahn established by Ricardo Montalban, absolutely nothing. It's a shame because the new cast captures the spirit of the original cast so magnificently. And paralleling The Wrath of Khan by flipping the fate Kirk and Spock was so obvious and lazy. And if Khan's blood can rejuvenate no one will ever die. Where was that established or even hinted at in the original timeline? Again, lazy writing and an easy way out. Star Trek Into Darkness is the crappiest of the crap that is bad Star Trek. Awful and disappointing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto-digitation Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 No thanks. Guess my Trek interest was born and died with Abrams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USB Connector Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Sadly it looks like that hack Roberto Orci is still writing it. Let's see what script his mad libs book will produce for the next Star Trek film. Since we have the director of Fast Five hopefully it will just be so over the top bad it will be funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del_Duio Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 I saw some awards show for 2 seconds last night while flipping channels and Patrick Stewart got up and read some nominees.Man, is he getting old now. Liver spots on the head now no less :( Like Jean Luc said in "Generations", "Now there's be no more Picards.." It's going to suck when he passes. He might be the most recognizable Star Trek icon this side of Spock and TNG deserved so much better. I wonder if anybody (else, aside from Spock prime) from the 24th century makes it into another new ST movie down the road? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReRushed Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I think this is really promising news. For the first time in a long time my interest is piqued! Simon Pegg is co-writing Star Trek 3! http://deadline.com/2015/01/star-trek-3-simon-pegg-1201355170/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USB Connector Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 I think this is really promising news. For the first time in a long time my interest is piqued! Simon Pegg is co-writing Star Trek 3! http://deadline.com/...egg-1201355170/ Pegg knows his Trek. Hopefully he'll swap out his version of the script when Orci takes a coffee break and burn Orci's script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now