laughedatbytime Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Well, maybe it's Hanley Ramirez and Pablo Sandoval instead... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 25, 2014 Author Share Posted November 25, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 26, 2014 Author Share Posted November 26, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 27, 2014 Author Share Posted November 27, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 27, 2014 Author Share Posted November 27, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUSHHEAD666 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Fuckk the fat Panda. The fatty wants to be a DH. I hear Cespedes might be moved to the Seattle Mariners. I will never understand the Red Cox. I wish they took Billy Beane when they had the chance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 28, 2014 Author Share Posted November 28, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)No, where would I ever get that impression... http://www.patriot-place.com/assets/Store_Heros/cbsscenelandingpage470x350.jpg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)No, where would I ever get that impression... http://www.patriot-place.com/assets/Store_Heros/cbsscenelandingpage470x350.jpg We just had lunch there last Saturday. We didn't see Mr Kraft though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 29, 2014 Author Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)No, where would I ever get that impression... http://www.patriot-place.com/assets/Store_Heros/cbsscenelandingpage470x350.jpg We just had lunch there last Saturday. We didn't see Mr Kraft though.He was probably going over what could and couldn't be said with his good friends Jim and Phil on the broadcast of the game. Edited November 29, 2014 by laughedatbytime 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)No, where would I ever get that impression... http://www.patriot-place.com/assets/Store_Heros/cbsscenelandingpage470x350.jpg We just had lunch there last Saturday. We didn't see Mr Kraft though.He was probably going over what could and couldn't be said with his good friends Jim and Phil on the broadcast of the game. You don't think two pros like that sort of know already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)No, where would I ever get that impression... http://www.patriot-place.com/assets/Store_Heros/cbsscenelandingpage470x350.jpg We just had lunch there last Saturday. We didn't see Mr Kraft though.He was probably going over what could and couldn't be said with his good friends Jim and Phil on the broadcast of the game. You don't think two pros like that sort of know already?You mean Jim Nantz is Lois Lerner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughedatbytime Posted September 19, 2015 Author Share Posted September 19, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted September 19, 2015 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! You did it again. We've found something you do well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Analog Cub Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 (edited) RNB your new avatar really brings out the part of you we've all been waiting to see, you closeted Cubs fan. I'm so proud. Edited September 20, 2015 by BowlCity 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! You did it again. We've found something you do well. That's ok, don't be jealous. I know you've mastered dishonesty and bias, but you'll find something worthwhile to do well some day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! You did it again. We've found something you do well. That's ok, don't be jealous. I know you've mastered dishonesty and bias, but you'll find something worthwhile to do well some day. You've proved it already. You don't have to keep doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LedRush Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! You did it again. We've found something you do well. That's ok, don't be jealous. I know you've mastered dishonesty and bias, but you'll find something worthwhile to do well some day. You've proved it already. You don't have to keep doing it. There, there, little guy. Chin up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. Backer Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Let me go on record saying I'm not excited about either of these moves. They may end up being great, and maybe there are more moves being made even now (I think Cespedes is gone) but right now I think Sandoval was a horrible signing, and Ramirez apparently is not a good citizen.But at least you'll be getting Ramirez's type of production from a left fielder. Will Cubs fans stand for a rebuilding year?Just been through three. But it's about to pay off. Probably not this year. But 2016 looks good. That's what they were saying in 1914 too. Not that 1916 looked good. 2016.We need an annual avatar (or sig) bet for the next ten years. More wins, Cubs or Bosox. Deal. Get used to having Tom as your avatar. And Nantz. And Belichick.I was thinking the Cub or Bosox logo, but if you want to go this way I'd be OK with it. Except we have no national announcers in the tank for the Fins or Cubbies. I'm OK with team logos then. You're not seriously suggesting that the Sox or the Patriots are favored by the national announcers are you? ;)The time, 8:42 CDT on 9/18/15. 86 + 77 = 163. I eagerly await seeing the Cub logo as your avatar. I have football and hockey games this morning. It will happen today. Unlike certain Patriot antagonists, I have integrity. Best joke evar! You did it again. We've found something you do well. That's ok, don't be jealous. I know you've mastered dishonesty and bias, but you'll find something worthwhile to do well some day. You've proved it already. You don't have to keep doing it. There, there, little guy. Chin up. Look, I know when someone in your shoes finally finds something they do even moderately well, there's a tendency to keep doing it to try and get approval from others. But it can get tiresome, and then you'll be right back where you started. So use the irony skill sparingly. Just a little friendly advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now