Jump to content

2014-15 NHL Season thread


Recommended Posts

that was two goals tonight that should have never been. Amazing

Just one. Maroon's. ;)

Seabrook's goal and Toew's last one were even with the pole. It's freakish they even scored.

 

If it hadn't been for that shitty deflection in the first period, this would be over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slow start. :sigh: Ducks 1 Hawks 0

Very slow. :eyeroll: Ducks 2 Hawks 0

Get Darling in there. :rage: Ducks 3 Hawks 0

T :dweez: E :dweez: R :dweez: A :dweez: V :dweez: A :dweez: I :dweez: N :dweez: E :dweez: N :martini: Ducks 3 Hawks 1

S :cosmo: E :cosmo: A :cosmo: B :cosmo: R :cosmo: O :cosmo: O :cosmo: K :madra: Ducks 3 Hawks 2

Not to be. :banghead: Ducks 4 Hawks 2

T :drool: O :drool: E :drool: W :drool: S :chickendance: Ducks 4 Hawks 3

T :notworthy: O :notworthy: E :notworthy: W :notworthy: S :popcorn: Hawks 4 Ducks 4

Hawks lose in OT.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emilio Estevez- Dude has not made a film in 20 years...talking smack........hack

 

http://i1303.photobucket.com/albums/ag153/Freedom80065/emilio_zpsok9requw.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not as exciting and impactful as an Emilio Estevez tweet, but here's some analysis on whether the Hawks and Rangers have more of a chance than might be surmised from their current situation.

 

Fear not, Blackhawks fans. Your team might have lost to the Anaheim Ducks on Monday night, going down three games to two in the insane Western Conference finals. But the Blackhawks have battled back before. Since 2010, when faced with elimination from the playoffs, they have an excellent 9-3 record.

 

And there’s hope for you, too, Rangers fans. Your team also needs a win — on Tuesday night against the Tampa Bay Lightning in the Eastern Conference finals — to stay alive. But the Rangers have been through this before — a lot. Since 2010, they have been faced with playoff elimination 18 times. They are 14-4 in those games.

 

There’s just one problem. Having a good record in elimination games doesn’t seem to predict much about how a team will fare the next time it must win or go home.

 

In the table below, I’ve listed all instances in the NHL expansion era1 in which an NHL team faced elimination in the playoffs but came in with a “hot” record in previous such games. A team qualified as “hot” if it was at least five games over .500 in playoff elimination games2 in the current season plus the past five seasons.3

 

silver-feature-nhlclutch-1.png?w=610&h=1749

 

How did these “hot” teams fare? They played 56 games … and won 28, or exactly half. So they’re basically doing as well as you would by flipping a coin. Previous clutch performance in playoff games doesn’t seem to count for much.

 

There’s just a teensy tiny bit of good news for Blackhawks and Rangers fans. While a 50 percent winning percentage isn’t great, it’s slightly better than the overall winning percentage for teams facing elimination, which is 45 percent. (Teams facing elimination are usually underdogs because of selection bias: If they were playing as well as their opponents, they probably wouldn’t be facing elimination to begin with.) The difference is too small to be statistically significant, however.4

 

The Rangers may have some other advantages late in playoff series. They have Henrik Lundqvist. And they’re an excellent five-on-five team, whereas their special teams are just average. Games 6 and 7 of playoff series historically feature relatively few penalties, which could play to the Rangers’ strengths.

 

The problem is that Tampa Bay has been a very good five-on-five team, too. And should the series go to Game 7, the Lightning have also been pretty good in the clutch, with a 6-2 record in elimination games since 2010. But, hey: Having to win two coin flips isn’t so bad; the Rangers have come back from much worse odds before.

Edited by laughedatbytime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S :chickendance: A :chickendance: A :chickendance: D :cosmo: Hawks 1 Ducks 0

H :kisshug: O :kisshug: S :kisshug: S :kisshug: A :mwah: Hawks 2 Ducks 0

K :dweez: A :dweez: N :dweez: E :D-13: Hawks 3 Ducks 0

That was way too fast. :facepalm: Hawks 3 Ducks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S :chickendance: A :chickendance: A :chickendance: D :cosmo: Hawks 1 Ducks 0

H :kisshug: O :kisshug: S :kisshug: S :kisshug: A :mwah: Hawks 2 Ducks 0

K :dweez: A :dweez: N :dweez: E :D-13: Hawks 3 Ducks 0

That was way too fast. :facepalm: Hawks 3 Ducks 1

Don't tell me. :rage: Hawks 3 Ducks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S :chickendance: A :chickendance: A :chickendance: D :cosmo: Hawks 1 Ducks 0

H :kisshug: O :kisshug: S :kisshug: S :kisshug: A :mwah: Hawks 2 Ducks 0

K :dweez: A :dweez: N :dweez: E :D-13: Hawks 3 Ducks 0

That was way too fast. :facepalm: Hawks 3 Ducks 1

Don't tell me. :rage: Hawks 3 Ducks 2

S :drool: H :drool: A :drool: W :cosmo: :cosmo: Hawks 4 Ducks 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...