Prince Sphinc-Tor Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Jan 31 2009, 07:14 PM) QUOTE (Tarkus406 @ Jan 31 2009, 08:08 PM) Here's them digital shots from Union Cemetery in Easton, CT http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/church.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/sideofroad.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/entrance.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Wow, thats way more on each picture then I had. I did have the one picture with the old mans face. That one was trully freaky. Of coarse Necro would say a picture of some old guy in a nursing home got intertwined with my roll of film. Some people are such skeptics, its not even worth argueing. Necro, if we shoot a roll of film in some dark location,(does not have to be a cemetary) and these things appear, I will concede it may be nothing. But if nothing shows up on th film, you better be ready to concede your wrong. I say go for it. But you would have to use the myth busters technique in that everything as far as the camera, time of day, exposure, etc...would have to be the same except for the location. As much as I would like to believe, to me it's just dust on the lense, or in the air or something, nothing conclusive....but I would love to proven wrong....I can handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necromancer Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Jan 31 2009, 08:14 PM) QUOTE (Tarkus406 @ Jan 31 2009, 08:08 PM) Here's them digital shots from Union Cemetery in Easton, CT http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/church.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/sideofroad.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/entrance.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Wow, thats way more on each picture then I had. I did have the one picture with the old mans face. That one was trully freaky. Of coarse Necro would say a picture of some old guy in a nursing home got intertwined with my roll of film. Some people are such skeptics, its not even worth argueing. Necro, if we shoot a roll of film in some dark location,(does not have to be a cemetary) and these things appear, I will concede it may be nothing. But if nothing shows up on th film, you better be ready to concede your wrong. Tick, i'm not conceding anything. You're the one that doesn't want to accept the truth. These things have been PROVEN to be either camera anamolies or lit up dust and moisture particles in the air at night. It's the flash. I thought that it didn't come up on digital, but i'm wrong on that. As for the face you saw, i'm willing to think that might have been odd, but it's more than likely a coincidence. boogabooga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted February 1, 2009 Author Share Posted February 1, 2009 Dust on the lense. Unga Bunga Binga ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarkus406 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) If only we had gotten shots from inside the cemetery Probably could have ended up with a little more action (other than police action ) Edited February 1, 2009 by Tarkus406 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softfilter Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 (edited) This was also a episode on the Discovery Channel series "A Haunting" I have the complete dvd collection. Good show, not wise to watch right b4 you go to sleep.. I tend to agree with Steve from Ghosthunters about orbs, they can be explained in many ways. ( dirt on lense, flying bugs, light reflection from camera, weather conditions) I had some pattern of light orbs like this taken at Gettysburg Confederate high water mark monument, I would like to believe there spirits of the old veterans doing one last reunion. But more then likely my cheap one shot just reflected flash off the monument. Dosen't mean I don't believe in supernatural, because I certainly do, seen and heard to much weird sh*t on shows like ghost hunters & paranormal state. Also personal experiences on civil war battlefield hikes, been to many east and west. Uneasy feelings, odd cold spots during sweltering summer heat, strange pockets of complete silence were fighting was at it's most brutal, although busy roadway just yards away jammed with tourist buses no sound heard not even a bird chirp.( Second Manassas battlefield ,unfinished railroad cut) Edited February 3, 2009 by softfilter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted February 3, 2009 Author Share Posted February 3, 2009 QUOTE (Prince Sphinc-Tor @ Jan 31 2009, 08:43 AM) QUOTE (tick @ Jan 30 2009, 02:22 PM) I can't wait to see this movie ! Living in Connecticut, makes it just a little cooler. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRJA3lN0xCQ That's a way overly Hollywoodized version of the story. the actual case is called The Lindley Street Haunting, or The Devil in CT Case. http://www.warrens.net/lindley_street.html There was a book written many years ago called The Demonologist. This is possibly...no.... without a doubt, the scariest thing I've ever read.http://www.thedemonologist.net/. I'm pretty sure a very detailed and "accurate" account of the story is included in that book. I USED to believe in all of that paranormal stuff, Ed and Lorraine Warren, demons, Jesus, and good VS evil blah blah blah and was really into as a kid and read all kinds of crap about it. Iteresting and scary if you believe, but just crazy stories if you don't. I believe you have given misinformation Prince. It would appear this movie is not based on the Lindley street haunting in Bridgeport. It is based on a haunting in Southington Connecticut. Check out this link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunting_in_Connecticut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I would love to get with you folks and do some ghost hunting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumstantial tree Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 Some posted pics by tourists Ghost Hunting in Beaufort, NC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Sphinc-Tor Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Feb 3 2009, 12:23 PM) QUOTE (Prince Sphinc-Tor @ Jan 31 2009, 08:43 AM) QUOTE (tick @ Jan 30 2009, 02:22 PM) I can't wait to see this movie ! Living in Connecticut, makes it just a little cooler. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRJA3lN0xCQ That's a way overly Hollywoodized version of the story. the actual case is called The Lindley Street Haunting, or The Devil in CT Case. http://www.warrens.net/lindley_street.html There was a book written many years ago called The Demonologist. This is possibly...no.... without a doubt, the scariest thing I've ever read.http://www.thedemonologist.net/. I'm pretty sure a very detailed and "accurate" account of the story is included in that book. I USED to believe in all of that paranormal stuff, Ed and Lorraine Warren, demons, Jesus, and good VS evil blah blah blah and was really into as a kid and read all kinds of crap about it. Iteresting and scary if you believe, but just crazy stories if you don't. I believe you have given misinformation Prince. It would appear this movie is not based on the Lindley street haunting in Bridgeport. It is based on a haunting in Southington Connecticut. Check out this link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunting_in_Connecticut Yer right...it turns out the Lindley Street events have some kind of link to the movie Poltergeist. As I mentioned it has been a long time since I was into any of this occult biz...so I guess I must have made a mistake...hope no one was misled. As it turns out there is another case that takes place in Southington (Mount Southington is where I learned to ski....I loved that place)...some kind of funereal home check out these links...sounds like the movie, or from what I saw in the trailer. I guess this story happened in '86 which was the year I moved out of CT and when I lost interest in the spooky stuff. http://www.ilovemysteries.com/viewpost_492961.asp http://www.fairfieldweekly.com/article.cfm?aid=10263 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiriusRushFan Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted March 19, 2009 Author Share Posted March 19, 2009 This movie opens on the 27th ! I can't wait to see it. I hope its good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarkus406 Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 QUOTE (SiriusRushFan @ Feb 3 2009, 09:22 PM) That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. Oh let us have our fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 (edited) A decent but flawed horror movie. While I would give it a 6 out of 10, there are issues. A good horror flick relies on building suspence so where the scares come, you are kind of taken off guard. In this movie, they tried to throw them at you a little bit too much. It took away from the movie, because you starting feeling numb to it. All in all though a flick that is better then most of this genre. I should add, I'm extremely hard to please when it comes to horror movies. My final words is, if you were planning on going, you should. Edited March 28, 2009 by tick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya_Big_Tree Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 QUOTE (SiriusRushFan @ Feb 3 2009, 08:22 PM) That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Pollen wouldn't show up like that, in different colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gompers Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 QUOTE (Ya_Big_Tree @ Mar 28 2009, 03:05 PM) QUOTE (SiriusRushFan @ Feb 3 2009, 08:22 PM) That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Pollen wouldn't show up like that, in different colours. Depends how the light refracts through it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Mar 28 2009, 02:08 PM) A decent but flawed horror movie. While I would give it a 6 out of 10, there are issues. A good horror flick relies on building suspence so where the scares come, you are kind of taken off guard. In this movie, they tried to throw them at you a little bit too much. It took away from the movie, because you starting feeling numb to it. All in all though a flick that is better then most of this genre. I should add, I'm extremely hard to please when it comes to horror movies. My final words is, if you were planning on going, you should. Can we bring this thread back on topic for those interested in the movie. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Test4VitalSigns Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 Pretty cool and spooky motion poster for this flick http://filmonic.com/haunting-connecticut-motion-poster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCFIELDS Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (Gompers @ Mar 28 2009, 01:32 PM) QUOTE (Ya_Big_Tree @ Mar 28 2009, 03:05 PM) QUOTE (SiriusRushFan @ Feb 3 2009, 08:22 PM) That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Pollen wouldn't show up like that, in different colours. Depends how the light refracts through it. Exactly........that looks like pollen to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Aubrey Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (Ya_Big_Tree @ Mar 28 2009, 02:05 PM) QUOTE (SiriusRushFan @ Feb 3 2009, 08:22 PM) That last shot looks kind of like it might have been very thick pollen in the air that night. You don't really notice it much at night, until you either shine any kind of light(a flashlight especially) into it, then you can see how truly thick it is. Almost like it's raining the stuff outside. Next time there's thick heavy pollen in the air, go for a walk at night with a flashlight, the shit is blowing and falling everywhere. Very easy to see with a flashlight. http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Pollen wouldn't show up like that, in different colours. Are you a pollen expert? No, you're not. Anyway, given the choices of that stuff being either ghosts or pollen, logic dictates that it is pollen. QED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Aubrey Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (Prince Sphinc-Tor @ Jan 31 2009, 10:51 PM) QUOTE (tick @ Jan 31 2009, 07:14 PM) QUOTE (Tarkus406 @ Jan 31 2009, 08:08 PM) Here's them digital shots from Union Cemetery in Easton, CT http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/church.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/sideofroad.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/entrance.jpg http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk264/Tarkus406/Union%20Cemetery/fence.jpg Wow, thats way more on each picture then I had. I did have the one picture with the old mans face. That one was trully freaky. Of coarse Necro would say a picture of some old guy in a nursing home got intertwined with my roll of film. Some people are such skeptics, its not even worth argueing. Necro, if we shoot a roll of film in some dark location,(does not have to be a cemetary) and these things appear, I will concede it may be nothing. But if nothing shows up on th film, you better be ready to concede your wrong. I say go for it. But you would have to use the myth busters technique in that everything as far as the camera, time of day, exposure, etc...would have to be the same except for the location. As much as I would like to believe, to me it's just dust on the lense, or in the air or something, nothing conclusive....but I would love to proven wrong....I can handle it. QUOTE But you would have to use the myth busters technique in that everything as far as the camera, time of day, exposure, etc...would have to be the same except for the location. Exactly, the original conditions should be replicated as closely as possible. And when it comes to the so-called evidence, you should use the scientific method instead of leaping to the conclusion that it's ghosts. Do they even teach the scientific method in school anymore? I'm not being snide, I'm genuinely curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted March 30, 2009 Author Share Posted March 30, 2009 Thanks for ignoring my request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCFIELDS Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Mar 29 2009, 08:47 PM) Thanks for ignoring my request. Sorry man........I didn't see your request when I posted...........my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Aubrey Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Mar 29 2009, 09:47 PM) Thanks for ignoring my request. OK, this movie looks like it'll be good! Whoever goes to see it first please post a review. Better, sir? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Sphinc-Tor Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (tick @ Mar 29 2009, 10:47 PM) Thanks for ignoring my request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick Posted March 30, 2009 Author Share Posted March 30, 2009 QUOTE (Jack Aubrey @ Mar 30 2009, 10:41 AM) QUOTE (tick @ Mar 29 2009, 09:47 PM) Thanks for ignoring my request. OK, this movie looks like it'll be good! Whoever goes to see it first please post a review. Better, sir? I ALREADY DID ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now