Jump to content

treeduck
 Share

Recommended Posts

481 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

15 members, 461 guests, 5 anonymous users

 

I'd say 70% of those guests are spambots. And only 3-7 of them will make accounts here each day.

Spambots on YouTube are worse, just to let you know. But I guess that's kinda irrelevant :/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

481 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

15 members, 461 guests, 5 anonymous users

 

I'd say 70% of those guests are spambots. And only 3-7 of them will make accounts here each day.

Spambots on YouTube are worse, just to let you know. But I guess that's kinda irrelevant :/

 

Correct. That is irrelevant. ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

481 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

15 members, 461 guests, 5 anonymous users

I was on a thread me and Cyclonus X-1 went back and forth on, and there was me (anonymous user) and 17 guests, Yeah it's probably bots...
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

481 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

15 members, 461 guests, 5 anonymous users

 

I'd say 70% of those guests are spambots. And only 3-7 of them will make accounts here each day.

 

So our traditional laws of hospitality towards house guests can be ignored? We can be rude and insulting all we want? :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

481 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

15 members, 461 guests, 5 anonymous users

 

I'd say 70% of those guests are spambots. And only 3-7 of them will make accounts here each day.

 

So our traditional laws of hospitality towards house guests can be ignored? We can be rude and insulting all we want? :D

 

Those spambot accounts never become activated, so we don't have the chance to be rude to them. :(

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

 

We rule!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

 

We rule!

:ebert: :ebert: :ebert:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

Where else would we be? :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

 

We rule!

 

Yep, we can’t be topped by those below. Don’t even try.

 

zNndwja.gif

Edited by invisible airwave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

I wonder that myself, because Bing is what the Amazon Fire tablets, like what I'm on, use as a default browser.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

 

We rule!

 

This is what was in my head:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

and that's how I found this forum :LOL:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when I am in a thread at it says "Bing(1)" or "Google(1) - is that a legit searcher or a bot or it depends? Ive seen more of those lately.

 

Those are bots, but they're legit bots. They're mining each of our threads, which is why you can do a search for a certain Rush topic on Google or Bing and if we posted about it, we'll be in the results list. And because we've been around for 16 years, we're usually at the top.

 

We rule!

 

This is what was in my head:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzHPpy6osK4

 

Deep faking his roles with Christopher Plummer rules even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...