Jump to content


split from "Rush retweeted me..."


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#1 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

Posted Image

Sponsored Post

#2 Laurabw

Laurabw

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1091 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:nj
  • Interests:golf, hockey, skiing, ballet, Grad School of Rock, Pilates, indoor climbing, community theater

Posted 30 May 2020 - 06:29 AM

Yeah yeah, I know....

#3 Principled Man

Principled Man

    Mathematical Porn Star

  • Members *
  • 13273 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Wisconsin
  • Interests:Rush
    Packers, Brewers & Badgers
    Monty Python
    Cincinnati Chili
    Refreshing Beverages
    Golf, Bowling, and Blu-ray
    TRAVEL
    Getting Slim & Trim
    The Universe!!

Posted 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

#4 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

#5 The Cat 3

The Cat 3

    Modern Day Alice Cooper

  • Members *
  • 22928 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:53rd & 3rd

Posted 30 May 2020 - 08:09 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

Posted Image

The only thing I see as problematic is your inappropriate comment.

A fellow Rush fan (and a super nice one at that) shares their excitement regarding a Rush connection and that’s the best thing you can say?

I believe a personal apology to the OP is in order.

It’s never too late to be a gentleman.

Edited by The Cat 3, 30 May 2020 - 08:15 AM.


#6 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 08:43 AM

View PostThe Cat 3, on 30 May 2020 - 08:09 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

Posted Image

The only thing I see as problematic is your inappropriate comment.

A fellow Rush fan (and a super nice one at that) shares their excitement regarding a Rush connection and that’s the best thing you can say?

I believe a personal apology to the OP is in order.

It’s never too late to be a gentleman.

A personal apology? Are you for real? :laughing guy: I'm sure she's a wonderful person and one hopes she has a good sense of humor. :D-13:

#7 Principled Man

Principled Man

    Mathematical Porn Star

  • Members *
  • 13273 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Wisconsin
  • Interests:Rush
    Packers, Brewers & Badgers
    Monty Python
    Cincinnati Chili
    Refreshing Beverages
    Golf, Bowling, and Blu-ray
    TRAVEL
    Getting Slim & Trim
    The Universe!!

Posted 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

#8 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

#9 1-0-0-1-0-0-1

1-0-0-1-0-0-1

    73

  • Admin
  • 35137 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

#10 HemiBeers

HemiBeers

    The God Of Balance

  • Members
  • 5406 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:kalamazoo, mi
  • Interests:playfully annoying on the verge of inappropriate.

Posted 30 May 2020 - 11:43 AM

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.
Posted Image

#11 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

#12 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2020 - 07:34 PM

View PostHemiBeers, on 30 May 2020 - 11:43 AM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.
Posted Image

While your nose is up there maybe you should check for polyps.

#13 1-0-0-1-0-0-1

1-0-0-1-0-0-1

    73

  • Admin
  • 35137 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 31 May 2020 - 02:09 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

Ugh, you're one of those guys. Haven't seen your type around here in years. You're not as smart and clever as you think you are. And you're still acting like a dick.

#14 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2020 - 04:41 AM

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 31 May 2020 - 02:09 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

Ugh, you're one of those guys. Haven't seen your type around here in years. You're not as smart and clever as you think you are. And you're still acting like a dick.

Tell me someone who is. You I suppose. Gosh, you are super smart and clever.

So I'm a type? What type might that be? Free thinker? I've been posting here for a year without issues (Rush boards in general since the late 90s) but I'm a type all of the sudden according to you. You don't actually know me but I'd love to hear what my type is. You've already assessed my level of intelligence, Einstein, so why not keep going? When you're done I'll tell you what type I think you are even though I know nothing about you. Seems fair, right? But in the meantime, look up the word "mediator." Being a good one of these is something every forum admin should strive to be. I seriously doubt blatant side-taking, recklessly miss-assessing a situation, or calling out board members as dicks and types is in the manual. If you don't like my responses to you then lay off the insults and marginalizations. Believe me, this type of interaction with you or anyone else here brings me no pleasure so if that's what you mean by "type" you are mistaken.

There appears to have been a misunderstanding about the joke I told. At least one person seems to think I made a random obscene gesture towards Laura and thusly thought I should apologize for it. Others might think this too. If this is the case, just know I would never do such a thing to her or any other poster on any board. When I said "the mask wearer" I meant that in a collective sense, not a specific one. If I'm guilty of anything it's that I didn't make what I said clear enough for it not to be misunderstood and that is regrettable. If on the other hand people are upset that I would dare sully Laura's news of her interaction with Rush.com with any sort of sex joke then I'm not sure I can help you with that. Perhaps I can wait longer next time. But I'm not a constant purveyor of sex jokes anyway so that shouldn't be a problem moving forward...if there is a forward.

#15 GeddysMullet

GeddysMullet

    Non-Binary

  • Members
  • 5411 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Northeast New Jersey
  • Interests:music, books, documentary films, parrots, long hair, big noses

Posted 31 May 2020 - 07:35 AM

Posted Image

#16 JohnnyBlaze

JohnnyBlaze

    The Ghost Rider

  • Members *
  • 34128 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2020 - 08:32 AM



#17 laughedatbytime

laughedatbytime

    Twin City Cub Fan

  • Members *
  • 85260 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:holidaying in Cambodia
  • Interests:marxism, hate, subjugating the individual to the state, the Great Purges, the Holodomor, the Cultural Revolution, the Great Leap Forward, the New York Times

Posted 31 May 2020 - 08:36 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 31 May 2020 - 04:41 AM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 31 May 2020 - 02:09 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

Ugh, you're one of those guys. Haven't seen your type around here in years. You're not as smart and clever as you think you are. And you're still acting like a dick.

Tell me someone who is. You I suppose. Gosh, you are super smart and clever.

So I'm a type? What type might that be? Free thinker? I've been posting here for a year without issues (Rush boards in general since the late 90s) but I'm a type all of the sudden according to you. You don't actually know me but I'd love to hear what my type is. You've already assessed my level of intelligence, Einstein, so why not keep going? When you're done I'll tell you what type I think you are even though I know nothing about you. Seems fair, right? But in the meantime, look up the word "mediator." Being a good one of these is something every forum admin should strive to be. I seriously doubt blatant side-taking, recklessly miss-assessing a situation, or calling out board members as dicks and types is in the manual. If you don't like my responses to you then lay off the insults and marginalizations. Believe me, this type of interaction with you or anyone else here brings me no pleasure so if that's what you mean by "type" you are mistaken.

There appears to have been a misunderstanding about the joke I told. At least one person seems to think I made a random obscene gesture towards Laura and thusly thought I should apologize for it. Others might think this too. If this is the case, just know I would never do such a thing to her or any other poster on any board. When I said "the mask wearer" I meant that in a collective sense, not a specific one. If I'm guilty of anything it's that I didn't make what I said clear enough for it not to be misunderstood and that is regrettable. If on the other hand people are upset that I would dare sully Laura's news of her interaction with Rush.com with any sort of sex joke then I'm not sure I can help you with that. Perhaps I can wait longer next time. But I'm not a constant purveyor of sex jokes anyway so that shouldn't be a problem moving forward...if there is a forward.
Pretty much everyone is as smart and clever as you.  It would be impossible not to be at least as clever.

#18 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2020 - 10:21 AM

View Postlaughedatbytime, on 31 May 2020 - 08:36 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 31 May 2020 - 04:41 AM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 31 May 2020 - 02:09 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

Ugh, you're one of those guys. Haven't seen your type around here in years. You're not as smart and clever as you think you are. And you're still acting like a dick.

Tell me someone who is. You I suppose. Gosh, you are super smart and clever.

So I'm a type? What type might that be? Free thinker? I've been posting here for a year without issues (Rush boards in general since the late 90s) but I'm a type all of the sudden according to you. You don't actually know me but I'd love to hear what my type is. You've already assessed my level of intelligence, Einstein, so why not keep going? When you're done I'll tell you what type I think you are even though I know nothing about you. Seems fair, right? But in the meantime, look up the word "mediator." Being a good one of these is something every forum admin should strive to be. I seriously doubt blatant side-taking, recklessly miss-assessing a situation, or calling out board members as dicks and types is in the manual. If you don't like my responses to you then lay off the insults and marginalizations. Believe me, this type of interaction with you or anyone else here brings me no pleasure so if that's what you mean by "type" you are mistaken.

There appears to have been a misunderstanding about the joke I told. At least one person seems to think I made a random obscene gesture towards Laura and thusly thought I should apologize for it. Others might think this too. If this is the case, just know I would never do such a thing to her or any other poster on any board. When I said "the mask wearer" I meant that in a collective sense, not a specific one. If I'm guilty of anything it's that I didn't make what I said clear enough for it not to be misunderstood and that is regrettable. If on the other hand people are upset that I would dare sully Laura's news of her interaction with Rush.com with any sort of sex joke then I'm not sure I can help you with that. Perhaps I can wait longer next time. But I'm not a constant purveyor of sex jokes anyway so that shouldn't be a problem moving forward...if there is a forward.
Pretty much everyone is as smart and clever as you.  It would be impossible not to be at least as clever.

Awww that's just sad but you tried. Here's a participation trophy for you. You'll get 'em next time, tiger!

Posted Image

#19 Three Eyes

Three Eyes

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2020 - 10:26 AM

^^^ You know that whole thing I said about anyone wearing the Starman mask is giving him a BJ? I take that back.

#20 laughedatbytime

laughedatbytime

    Twin City Cub Fan

  • Members *
  • 85260 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:holidaying in Cambodia
  • Interests:marxism, hate, subjugating the individual to the state, the Great Purges, the Holodomor, the Cultural Revolution, the Great Leap Forward, the New York Times

Posted 31 May 2020 - 10:28 AM

View PostThree Eyes, on 31 May 2020 - 10:21 AM, said:

View Postlaughedatbytime, on 31 May 2020 - 08:36 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 31 May 2020 - 04:41 AM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 31 May 2020 - 02:09 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:30 PM, said:

View Post1-0-0-1-0-0-1, on 30 May 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 10:56 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 10:35 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 07:08 AM, said:

View PostPrincipled Man, on 30 May 2020 - 06:33 AM, said:

View PostThree Eyes, on 30 May 2020 - 03:59 AM, said:

Uhhhh I really didn't want to say anything....but I couldn't help but notice that the juxtaposition between the Starman's, shall we say, little Starman, and the mask wearer's mouth is extremely problematic. I'm not sure who but someone needs to get canceled here.

There is nothing wrong with the picture.  If someone wants to interpret it in a sexual way, then that is THEIR decision and THEIR problem.

Good lord will you shut up. lol.

Good lord if you didn't want to say anything then you shouldn't have said anything  :scared: :lol: :lol:

Wow. Clever. Someone had his Ovaltine this morning.

If I hadn't said anything I wouldn't know who wears the halos around here. Btw, can you turn yours down a notch. It's blinding the f**k out of me.

Hi Three Eyes, as a board admin, I believe I can offer a different perspective concerning your posts in this thread: You're acting like a dick. Maybe you can turn THAT down a notch? Actually, all the way down to zero would work.

Hi there Mr. As-a-Board-Admin. Should I report directly to the principal's office now? Nice Fife-ian intimidation tactic, btw.

How am I the one being the dick here? I'm just responding to attacks from a couple of white knights (who are no doubt salivating at the prospect of my imminent banning) over a harmless innuendo that wasn't even directed at the OP. I was just pointing out the accidental silliness of the way the Starman design looks on a face mask - which is something that should be pointed out if for no other reason than the funniness of it. So the joke is about the mask, not Laura, who, if you'll bother to look above, made no initial fuss over it. But I guess some here get upset over jokes more risque than a Carol Burnett sketch circa 1968.

Ugh, you're one of those guys. Haven't seen your type around here in years. You're not as smart and clever as you think you are. And you're still acting like a dick.

Tell me someone who is. You I suppose. Gosh, you are super smart and clever.

So I'm a type? What type might that be? Free thinker? I've been posting here for a year without issues (Rush boards in general since the late 90s) but I'm a type all of the sudden according to you. You don't actually know me but I'd love to hear what my type is. You've already assessed my level of intelligence, Einstein, so why not keep going? When you're done I'll tell you what type I think you are even though I know nothing about you. Seems fair, right? But in the meantime, look up the word "mediator." Being a good one of these is something every forum admin should strive to be. I seriously doubt blatant side-taking, recklessly miss-assessing a situation, or calling out board members as dicks and types is in the manual. If you don't like my responses to you then lay off the insults and marginalizations. Believe me, this type of interaction with you or anyone else here brings me no pleasure so if that's what you mean by "type" you are mistaken.

There appears to have been a misunderstanding about the joke I told. At least one person seems to think I made a random obscene gesture towards Laura and thusly thought I should apologize for it. Others might think this too. If this is the case, just know I would never do such a thing to her or any other poster on any board. When I said "the mask wearer" I meant that in a collective sense, not a specific one. If I'm guilty of anything it's that I didn't make what I said clear enough for it not to be misunderstood and that is regrettable. If on the other hand people are upset that I would dare sully Laura's news of her interaction with Rush.com with any sort of sex joke then I'm not sure I can help you with that. Perhaps I can wait longer next time. But I'm not a constant purveyor of sex jokes anyway so that shouldn't be a problem moving forward...if there is a forward.
Pretty much everyone is as smart and clever as you.  It would be impossible not to be at least as clever.

Awww that's just sad but you tried. Here's a participation trophy for you. You'll get 'em next time, tiger!

Posted Image
There's nothing more sad, and yet funny at the same time, as a half wit appointing himself as judge of anything.  Yet here you are.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users