Jump to content


The big clash of rock Titans: Led Zeppelin or Rush?


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

Poll: Led Zeppelin or Rush? (41 member(s) have cast votes)

Led Zeppelin or Rush?

  1. Led Zeppelin (4 votes [9.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.76%

  2. Rush (37 votes [90.24%])

    Percentage of vote: 90.24%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 EagleMoon

EagleMoon

    Beauty and the Bass

  • Members
  • 21773 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Interests:GUI and graphic design, writing, reading, hiking with my dog and photography.

Posted 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

Sponsored Post

#22 Lorraine

Lorraine

    Dial-Up Diva

  • Members *
  • 42212 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.

#23 vaportrailer

vaportrailer

    The Professor

  • Members
  • 3720 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:music, reading, travel

Posted 19 November 2016 - 05:10 PM

View Postcustom55, on 18 November 2016 - 09:53 PM, said:

apples and oranges

Posted Image

#24 rocket ignites

rocket ignites

    The God Of Balance

  • Members
  • 5549 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duluth, MN
  • Interests:Poker. Minnesota Vikings/Twins/T-Wolves. Being a glass half-full advocate for post 1982 Rush.

Posted 19 November 2016 - 06:03 PM

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 01:46 PM, said:

View PostA rocket that ignites itself, on 19 November 2016 - 12:05 PM, said:

I've never been on www.theledzeppelinforum.com...so :rush:  is better!

I wonder how the same poll would do on the LZ forum?  Any thoughts?

:eyeroll:
Landslide the other way of course.  Different strokes but no Led Zep song has ever hit me as hard as so many Rush songs.  I can still appreciate LZ.

#25 rocket ignites

rocket ignites

    The God Of Balance

  • Members
  • 5549 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duluth, MN
  • Interests:Poker. Minnesota Vikings/Twins/T-Wolves. Being a glass half-full advocate for post 1982 Rush.

Posted 19 November 2016 - 06:07 PM

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.
Well.  LZ can offer an introduction to black magic.  ;)

#26 EagleMoon

EagleMoon

    Beauty and the Bass

  • Members
  • 21773 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Interests:GUI and graphic design, writing, reading, hiking with my dog and photography.

Posted 19 November 2016 - 08:24 PM

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.

Very good point.

#27 vaportrailer

vaportrailer

    The Professor

  • Members
  • 3720 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:music, reading, travel

Posted 19 November 2016 - 10:20 PM

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.

LedZed offers 100% more lemon squeezing than Rush.
:o !

#28 EagleMoon

EagleMoon

    Beauty and the Bass

  • Members
  • 21773 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Interests:GUI and graphic design, writing, reading, hiking with my dog and photography.

Posted 20 November 2016 - 02:46 AM

View Postvaportrailer, on 19 November 2016 - 10:20 PM, said:

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.

LedZed offers 100% more lemon squeezing than Rush.
:o !

But Rush has the lemony cake.

#29 Stormtron

Stormtron

    The God Of Balance

  • Members *
  • 7034 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:VA

Posted 20 November 2016 - 07:33 AM

I love Zeppelin, but they never moved me like Rush. I'd even take most of 80s Rush over Zep.

#30 vaportrailer

vaportrailer

    The Professor

  • Members
  • 3720 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:music, reading, travel

Posted 20 November 2016 - 09:31 AM

View PostEagleMoon, on 20 November 2016 - 02:46 AM, said:

View Postvaportrailer, on 19 November 2016 - 10:20 PM, said:

View PostLorraine, on 19 November 2016 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:

View PostEagleMoon, on 19 November 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

View PostTexas King, on 19 November 2016 - 05:44 AM, said:

I would make this comparison of albums:
Rush debut vs LZ debut - LZ by a landslide

1)2112 vs LZ 1 - LZ 1
2)AFTK vs LZ II - LZ II
3)Hemispheres vs LZ III - Hemispheres
4)PeW vs LZ IV - LZ IV
5)MP vs HoH - MP
6)Signals vs Physical Graffiti - PG by far.

That's it.

Wow.  Not much of a Rush fan, are you?  

;)

OK then. A question for you: Signals or Physical Graffiti?
I think if you would ask Alex Lifesson this, I'm pretty sure that his answer would be: "PG by a lightyear".   ;)

That's a bit different. No one thinks their music is better than their idols. I love Signals. Took me a lot of years, and if you'd asked me in the late 80s which I had preferred I might have slightly edged towards PG. But now, no contest.

That's because LZ has nothing more to offer than their music.  With Rush, it's a lot more than just their music.  At least, that's how I see it.

Rush is enduring.

LedZed offers 100% more lemon squeezing than Rush.
:o !

But Rush has the lemony cake.

:lol:
Made from freshly squeezed lemons!

#31 Blue J

Blue J

    Official SOCN Designated Driver

  • Members *
  • 17672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 November 2016 - 09:01 AM

For the past several years, I haven't listened to Zeppelin nearly as much as I used to. Great band, and I love 'em.

But they can't touch Rush.

#32 Fridge

Fridge

    The Freezable Fridgeâ„¢

  • Members *
  • 9844 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeenshire, Scotland
  • Interests:Being a covers band hack
    hillwalking
    Just about anything in the great outdoors

Posted 22 November 2016 - 09:28 AM

I hate to break it to you, but anywhere outside a Rush fan forum, this wouldn't even be a contest...there is no way in a million years that most people would view Rush as a rock "titan" in the same league as Zep.

Myself, I prefer Rush.....they were much more consistent imo in their earlier years than Zep were, and live much, much tighter....

#33 TheAccountant

TheAccountant

    Superconductor

  • Members
  • 1273 posts

Posted 23 November 2016 - 11:05 PM

Let me express my thoughts as follows:

Vocals:  Geddy vs. Plant - I prefer Geddy.  Not close. (I am not a big Robert Plant fan - he does not really rank all that high on my list of great singers)

Base:  Geddy Vs. John Paul Jones - I prefer Geddy.  Not close.

Drums: Neil Vs. John Bonham - I prefer Neil.  Plus I don't think JB was a big influence on Neil.  I think Keith Moon was more of an influence.  It s fairly close but Neil is my preference.

Guitar - Alex Vs. Page - Very, very close.  Page had more of an impact on Rock (IMO) but  slightly prefer Alex's style.  Basically a draw.

Song Lyrics - Zeppelin has some magnificent lyrics.  Rush has magnificent lyrics.  Then some more wonderful lyrics.  Then Neil grew and changed what he was writing about (around the time of MP / Signals).  I don't hear Zep making such a transition.  Based on volume of greatness and an ability to grow Rush is my preference.  Not their fault that Zep could not change - it was the sad loss of JB that may, or may not, have prevented that.  But even so, Rush, prior to MP / Signals was better than Zep at its best.  And much of Neil's best was yet to come.

Music - both are great.  But I prefer Rush.  

I think you can see where I am going.  Rush gets my vote.  Frankly, if you matched The Who up against Rush, now that would be an interesting & difficult match up.  Much harder to pick.

#34 Carvan Alex

Carvan Alex

    The Seeker

  • Members
  • 209 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:La Habra, CA
  • Interests:Music, LA Sports (Dodgers/Kings/Rams), Comics, Movies, Theme Parks, England.

Posted 03 December 2016 - 01:36 AM

View Postvaportrailer, on 19 November 2016 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postcustom55, on 18 November 2016 - 09:53 PM, said:

apples and oranges

Posted Image
^^^^^^  This picture says it.  I actually love BOTH Rush and Led Zeppelin, and people tend to forget that if it wasn't for them, we wouldn't have Rush (or Queen, Foo Fighters...you get the point).  I couldn't vote for one or the other in this forum.  Can we have The Beatles in this poll as well ;)  .  And I actually think Houses of the Holy is an underrated Led Zeppelin album.

#35 Mithrandir

Mithrandir

    Superconductor

  • Members *
  • 1189 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 December 2016 - 02:54 PM

My two favorite bands by a long, long, long, long shot.

Rush.

#36 JohnnyBlaze

JohnnyBlaze

    The Ghost Rider

  • Members *
  • 30145 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 December 2016 - 06:04 PM

This poll's closer than I expected

#37 toscanobarga

toscanobarga

    Prime Mover

  • Members *
  • 831 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 December 2016 - 01:11 PM

On a Rush forum, wonder what the result will be !  :rfl:

The Rush star has burned for 40 years, at some times dimmer than others.

LZ's star burned supernova bright for a short period of time.

Close, but LZ has always been and probably always will be my favorite band.

Rush is a close 2nd though.

#38 Segue Myles

Segue Myles

    Cupcake Warrior

  • Members
  • 32237 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Interests:Lacuna Coil
    Nightwish
    Within Temptation
    The Juliana Theory
    REM
    Thrice
    Idlewild
    Jimmy Eat World
    HIM
    Paradise Lost
    AFI
    U2
    Bruce Springsteen
    Sonata Arctica
    Pearl Jam
    Biffy Clyro
    Placebo

Posted 08 December 2016 - 06:44 PM

I'm going to have to vote Rush.

Right now I'm not into Rush. But if I judge the entire discography of Led Zeppelin, they fizzled out by like 1975 and wussed their way to the very end.

Rush took a bit of time getting to grips with being ABSOLUTELY AWESOME and once they did maintained it across three and more decades with a new sound it seems every record.

Rush. LZ have killer material but Rush are bae.

#39 bluefox4000

bluefox4000

    I never talk to strangers

  • Members
  • 15749 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, NY
  • Interests:Music, Reading, Talking

Posted 08 December 2016 - 06:52 PM

View PostSegue Myles, on 08 December 2016 - 06:44 PM, said:

I'm going to have to vote Rush.

Right now I'm not into Rush. But if I judge the entire discography of Led Zeppelin, they fizzled out by like 1975 and wussed their way to the very end.

Rush took a bit of time getting to grips with being ABSOLUTELY AWESOME and once they did maintained it across three and more decades with a new sound it seems every record.

Rush. LZ have killer material but Rush are bae.

my logic too.  Zep in reality for me has 2 albums i call essential rush has 7 or 8.

but then again Rush outlived Zep so......lol

Mick

#40 Pressure/Hopenosis

Pressure/Hopenosis

    The Seeker

  • Members *
  • 234 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southeastern Michigan
  • Interests:Family, music, sports, outdoors, photography and lots of other cool stuff I forgot to mention...

Posted 08 December 2016 - 07:20 PM

John Bonham played a mean set of paper drums!!!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users